Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document235-1 Filed10/21/09 Page1 of 3

EXHIBIT A
 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW
Case: 09-17241 10/20/2009
Document235-1
Page: 1 ofFiled10/21/09
2 DktEntry: 7100548
Page2 of 3
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., No. 09-17241

Plaintiffs - Appellees, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW

Northern District of California,
and San Francisco

OUR FAMILY COALITION; et al.,

ORDER
Plaintiffs-intervenors - Appellees,

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as Governor of California;
et al.,

Defendants,

and

PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL
PROPONENTS; et al.,

Defendants-intervenors - Appellants.

A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this

interlocutory appeal because this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review

discovery orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Truckstop.net, LLC v. Sprint Corp.,

cj/MOATT
 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW
Case: 09-17241 10/20/2009
Document235-1
Page: 2 ofFiled10/21/09
2 DktEntry: 7100548
Page3 of 3

547 F.3d 1065, 1067 (9th Cir. 2008); KL Group v. Case, Kay & Lynch, 829 F.2d

909, 918, n. 5 (9th Cir. 1987). Within 21 days after the date of this order,

appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause,

a response may be filed within 8 days after service of the memorandum.

If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this

appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1.

Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.

FOR THE COURT:

Molly Dwyer
Clerk of Court

By: Caroline A. Jacobs

Motions Attorney/Deputy Clerk
9th Cir. R. 27-7
General Orders/Appendix A

cj/MOATT 2 09-17241