Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Tuf-Tite v. Federal Package Networks

Tuf-Tite v. Federal Package Networks

Ratings: (0)|Views: 32|Likes:
Published by PriorSmart
Official Complaint for Declaratory Judgement in Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02060: Tuf-Tite, Inc. v. Federal Package Networks, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the Hon. John Z. Lee presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-la8U for more info.
Official Complaint for Declaratory Judgement in Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-02060: Tuf-Tite, Inc. v. Federal Package Networks, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the Hon. John Z. Lee presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-la8U for more info.

More info:

Published by: PriorSmart on Mar 25, 2014
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/25/2014

pdf

text

original

 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TUF-TITE, INC. Plaintiff, vs. FEDERAL PACKAGE NETWORKS, INC. Defendant. )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14cv2060
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
 ______________________________________________________________________________
COMPLAINT
 ______________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff Tuf-Tite, Inc. (“Tuf-Tite”) complains of defendant Federal Package Networks, Inc. (“Federal Package”) as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1.
 
On October 10, 2001, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued United States Patent No. 6,129,471 entitled “Stick Applicator with Incremental Dispensing Action.” A copy of the ‘471 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Federal Package is identified as the assignee on the face of the ‘471 patent. 2.
 
On March 19, 2014, an attorney representing Federal Package contacted Tuf-Tite, alleging that Tuf-Tite’s INPRES Applicator infringes the ‘471 patent. The letter demanded that Tuf-Tite cease to manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale, or import the applicator. 3.
 
Tuf-Tite now files this complaint requesting declaratory judgment that Tuf-Tite does not infringe the ‘471 patent and that the ‘471 patent is invalid.
 
-2-
PARTIES
4.
 
Plaintiff Tuf-Tite is a corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, and maintains a principal place of business at 1200 Flex Court, Lake Zurich, Illinois 60047. 5.
 
Defendant Federal Package is a corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and maintains a principal place of business at 4044 Peavey Rd, Chaska, MN 55318.
JURISDICTION
6.
 
This is an action for a declaratory judgment pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. This action arises, in part, under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §1, et seq. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). 7.
 
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Federal Package since, on information and belief, Federal Package regularly conducts business within the Northern District of Illinois and since Federal Package targeted its cease and desist letter to the Northern District of Illinois. 8.
 
In view of the nature of Federal Package’s March 19, 2014 “cease and desist” letter to Tuf-Tite, Tuf-Tite reasonably believes that it bears a substantial risk of harm stemming from Federal Package’s infringement allegations. 9.
 
There is, therefore, an actual controversy between the parties with respect to the validity of the ‘471 patent and its infringement by Tuf-Tite.
VENUE
10.
 
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c).
COUNT I – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT TUF-TITE’S INPRES APPLICATOR DOES NOT INFRINGE ANY CLAIM OF THE ‘471 PATENT
 
-3- 11.
 
Tuf-Tite realleges paragraphs 1-10 of this Complaint as if fully set forth here. 12.
 
Tuf-Tite has not infringed and does not infringe any valid claim of the ‘471  patent, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly or indirectly, willfully or otherwise.
COUNT II – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT THE CLAIMS OF THE ‘471 PATENT ARE INVALID
13.
 
Tuf-Tite realleges paragraphs 1-10 of this Complaint as if fully set forth here. 14.
 
Each claim of the ‘471 patent is invalid for failure to comply with one or more of the requirements set forth in 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, and/or 112.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Tuf-Tite, Inc prays for the following relief: A.
 
that judgment be entered in Tuf-Tite’s favor that Tuf-Tite has not infringed and does not infringe any valid claim of the ‘471 patent; B.
 
that judgment be entered in Tuf-Tite’s favor that one or more claims of the ‘471  patent are invalid. C.
 
that judgment be entered in Tuf-Tite’s favor that this case is exceptional and awarding Tuf-Tite its attorney fees and costs under 35 U.S.C. § 285; and D.
 
that Tuf-Tite be awarded any other relief as the court or a jury deems just and  proper.
JURY DEMAND
Tuf-Tite, Inc. demands trial by jury of all issues properly so triable.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->