Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Octavio Ugarte Delgado, A205 829 687 (BIA Mar. 13, 2014)

Octavio Ugarte Delgado, A205 829 687 (BIA Mar. 13, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 268|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for consideration of whether "synthetic identity deception" under Ind. Code 35-43-5-3.8(a)(3) is divisible in light of Descamps v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2276 (2013). The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for consideration of whether "synthetic identity deception" under Ind. Code 35-43-5-3.8(a)(3) is divisible in light of Descamps v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2276 (2013). The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 26, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/20/2014

pdf

text

original

 
*S-UGARTE DELGADO, OCTAVIO  231886/A205829687 PUTNAMVILLE CORR. FAC 946 WEST US HIGHWAY 40 GEENCASE, IN 46135
US   
Excutv Oc  Immgato Rvw
Board of Immigraton Appeals Oce o the Clerk
 507 Leburg Pike, Suite 2000 Fals Chrc Vrgina 20530
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel CH 525 West Van Bre Street Ccago, L 60607 Nam: SUGARTE DEGADO, OCAVIO A 205-829-687 Date o this otice: 3/13/201 4
nclosd s a copy o the Boad' dcso and o n th abov-nd cas. Encos
 Mb: Py, Rg
Scy,
D
O
 c
l
Donna Carr Chief Clerk
wll : k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Octavio Ugarte Delgado, A205 829 687 (BIA Mar. 13, 2014)
 
U.S
Department of ustice
Executive Oce r Immaon Revew Decson of he Board of Immgraon Appeals Fl Cur, Vn
20530
 Fle: A205 82  68 Plaineld 
In e: O  CTA VO UGARTE ELGADO 
IN REMOVAL PROCEINGS  PEAL ON BEHALF OF SPOEN Pro se at: ON BEAL OF DHKrstin nsley  ssistnt Chief Counsl
MAR 1 3 204
In an oral ecsion atd ovmber 25, 2013, an migation Judg un th rspondnt reovable; etened tat e di not deonsate elgbiit   elie om emoval; an orded im removed om the Unite Stats to Mxico he espondent appeald om tat decison. Te recod w be emane Te now 36year-o respondnt was un rmovabl on both charged namissibiity gounds, as convicted of a crim inolving oral turitue (CIMT") under section 212a)(2)(A)(i)() of t migration and Nationalt ct, 8 .SC § 8(a)()()()(I), an as present wtout being admitted o parole uner section 2(a)(6)(A)(i) of th Act As substatat by coniction documets, e has a Marc 6, 203, coniction upon a guilty plea r snthetic intity decption" undr Ind Coe § 35-4353.8(a)(3). Fo such crime, h was sntenc to imprsonment o 2 s, wt iositon of 8 months o tat sntnc sspendd subject to comltion of pobation.
S
Ex 2 He arrivd in t United tates in about 18
S
IJ.
at 3; Tr at 34 8 Te Imiraton udge d te respondent remoable der section 2(a)2)(A)(i)(I o te Act bse on hs 203 Indina conviction r snthetic identity dception" n additon, th Immiation udge note tat, in view of suc conviction, the respondent was ineligibe r cacellation of rmoval.
S
sctions 40A{b)()(B), 8 UC § 2bb)()(B)
 s so
section (3) o te Act, 8 UC § 0((3); J. at 2. Ths ord revews n mmigaton Jge's ndings of ct, incudin ndngs as to the credibility of testimony, uder te clearly erroneous" stndard
S
8 CR. § 1003()(3)(i);
Mr of R-S-H-
23 & c 6 (BA 003);
M o SH,
23 I& Dec. 46 (BIA 2002). We view questions o law, discretion n udent, nd all othr issus
 d ovo. S
8 CFR § 03)
 o --B,
 & ec   008 The statut unr wich e responent was conicted, n Code § 3543-5-38(a)(3), povids, A erson wo knowingly or intentionaly obtains, possesss, anss, or uss e synthetic inting imation  wt intent to roess to b aother peson . commits snthetic dentity dceton . " Fur, In Coe § 5--5- provdes, It is not a dense n a proscution dr subsecton (a) or ( tt no eson was am o eud."
Cite as: Octavio Ugarte Delgado, A205 829 687 (BIA Mar. 13, 2014)
 
·1
A05 829 687 t is we-estbishe tht oeses inoig u n the constiue Is.
See, e.g, Mater of Pinzon,
6 &N Dec 189 19-95 (B 01 (owgy n willy ming ay mterl lse ctiious or uulent stement o ot a nited Stes psspo
atter of Jurado,
24 &N Dec. 9  (BA 2006 (reti he;
ater of Alarcon,
20 &N ec. 557 559-60 (BA 1992) (pety he an mil u
ater of Adetiba,
20 &N Dec 506 507-08 (BA 1992) (mi u);
Matter of Correa-Garces,
20 I&N Dec 451 454 (BA 192) (au);
Mtter of Esfndiary,
16 IN ec. 659 660-61 (BIA 1979) (micious esss with inent to commit peti arceny;
Matter o houinard,
11 IN Dec. 89 840-41 (BIA 1996 (simle rceny  ileg use of  creit c We  that  ren s ecessy in his case Pursuant to
Descamps
v.
United Sttes,
_U.S. (201 the resonent cou be u remobe uer secion 212()(2(A)(i)( of he ct if  coniction uer the din sue pertng to syhetic ienity ecepton" either s categoicly  u or e oese or is iisie with u o he emonse by e coiction ocumetshe Noember 201 orl ecisio incues the iion Juge's saemet that eity eception my be  iisibe satute" bu such eciso oes not inicte which conicion ocumes my he een consue ad does no contin  etaie lysis regring the ctegoricl  modie caegorical proches. O rem the mmtion   Juge shou reconsider his ecisio in lgh of
Descams
v
Unted Stats, sura,
n oer icabe cae receent. Both the resondent n he Depme of Homen ecurity my submi y a l ailble reet eience s pproriate. Accoringy we enter the llowg orer ODER The record is remne to the Immiaion ou r fuher proceeigs a r the ssunce of  new eciso consstet wh his opnio.
1
 For example on s ce he stute woul appear o py o erso who presented documets eraning to anoer perso n oder to ga access to  gcub or are n  aipor resered r prerred rne cutomes wle wang epure.
Cite as: Octavio Ugarte Delgado, A205 829 687 (BIA Mar. 13, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->