Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Christian Gerardo Solis Rojas, A205 572 958 (BIA Mar. 19, 2014)

Christian Gerardo Solis Rojas, A205 572 958 (BIA Mar. 19, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the Immigration Judge did not adequately inform the pro se respondent of all available forms of relief, and because his finding that the respondent was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude did not provide a meaningful basis for appellate review. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger and joined by Member Elise Manuel and Member Sharon Hoffman.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the Immigration Judge did not adequately inform the pro se respondent of all available forms of relief, and because his finding that the respondent was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude did not provide a meaningful basis for appellate review. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger and joined by Member Elise Manuel and Member Sharon Hoffman.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 26, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
U.S. Departmen of Jusice
Executive Ofce r Immgraon Reiew
Board of Immigration Appeals Oce of the Clerk
 5107 Leesbg Pik, St 2000 Fal Churc. Vgn 20530
SOLIS ROJAS, CHRSTIAN GERADO A205-572-958 HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel -DEN 2445 East Caley Aveue HS/CE GEO 3130 N. OAKLAND SRE AURORA CO 80010 Cetenial, CO 80111-5663 Name: SOIS OJAS CHRSTAN GER  A 205-572-958 Date of this notice: 3/9/2014
Elosd s a copy o the Bod's deso and ore n th aboe-ened ase. ncosre
Pl Mb: , E H, h Gdg 
Snerel,
D
o
c
t
Donna Car Che rk
Lulseges

m:
k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Christian Gerardo Solis Rojas, A205 572 958 (BIA Mar. 19, 2014)
 
U.S Deparmen of Justie
Eecutive Oce r Iaon Reew Fa
Chµch,
Vrga
2053
Fl: A205 572 958 -Denve, CO n e CHTIN GAO O OJ N MOVL PROCDG P ON BF OF ESONDEN Po se
Decs of he Board f mmgao Appeal
Dat
MAR 1 9 20
 The espondet, a natve ad ctzen of exco, as appealed o the gaton Judge's Octobe 29 203, decson odeng s eoval o the Unted States h Depatnt of oeland ecuty ("H) has ot ld a be n opposton he ecod wll  anded to the aton udge  h poceedngs W evew dngs of ct, cludng cedblty detenatons, ude a cleay eoneos stadad 8 CF § 03(d)(3)() W evew questons o aw, ncludng whethe te paes have et the eevat ude of poo, ad ssues o dsceton unde a de novo standad 8 CF § 03(d)(3)() Upon d novo vew we conclude tat the gaton udge dd not adequately n te espondt -who appeaed be  po se of the s o elef aalab to h  at 2)
See
8 CF § 12401;
Matter ofC-B,
25 &N Dec 888 B 2012) h gato udg does not appea to hav consdeed te espondns elgblty  le o eoval o eannglly appsed the espondn of any potental s o lef suc as peand postconcluson voluntay dpatue uheo th gaton udges concuson that the spondets convcton as  a ce nvolvng oal tptude was not suppord by any lgal authoty o xplanaton beyond hs ndng that t s not sple assaut t goes byond that wth th use o a eal o suatd wapon (J at
).
n oal decson ust accuatey suze the lvant cts, ect the gaton Judges analyss o the applcal statutes, egulatons, and legal pecedents, and clealy st h th gaton udges lega concluson
atter of AP
22 &N Dec 68 (B 999) h gaton udgs decson, as pesently consttted, dos not povd us wth a eanngl bass  applate evew
See generally ater of SH
23 & Dc 462 (B 2002) n lght o he egong, he ecod wll be eanded  e poceedngs On ed th spondent shold  gven the oppounty to apply  ay r o ele  whch e s lgle. The new evdnce subtted  the espondets appeal ay e cosdeed by t aton Judg upon eand ccodngly the llowng ode sall be ented
Cite as: Christian Gerardo Solis Rojas, A205 572 958 (BIA Mar. 19, 2014)
 
5 5 958 OR he ecod  emaded o he mgo ou  he poceedng coe wh hi decion 2
Cite as: Christian Gerardo Solis Rojas, A205 572 958 (BIA Mar. 19, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->