High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
IPJ^^W^WJ^^M^W^^
r
5 ♦
I
if-*
;
£
n
V
IN THE
CIRCUIT COURT
OF
LAKE COUNTY
People ex relself and/or on behalf of on behalf of Petitioner
C4a&c
-vs-
J,
^plttiGA
\
RespondentCase No.
.v a
D
Independent ProceedingO Other Civil Proceeding
(Specify) IZ
Criminal Prpccedii
i'Z
Juvenile Pfojftedi!Now comes the Petitionerbehalf of CrttUSIT'f'ft J
PETITION FOR ORDER OF PROTECTION
[Fill in lines and check boxes as applicable.
dM
r own behalf or ona minor child, or on behalf of , an sdull prevented by disability or advanced age from seeking protection on
his/her own
behalf,
pursuant
to the
Illinois Domestic
Violence Act
of
1986 as
amended
(IDVA).
and
moves
this honorable Counto issue an Order of Protection in this cause and in sujppon thereof states as follows:ALLEGATIONSTHIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION OF THE SUBJECT MATTER AND OVER ALL NECESSARY PERSONS. WITHAPPROPRIATE VENUE, BECAUSE:A.
U?
Petitioner residesState of
42U/J0O
OR
« Petitioner resides at l7£fr.S VJ AflaT
HDQtLJ
9
^*
the County of ^^_, the person on whose behalf State of this Petition is brought, resides at
.S&&\
£in the County of
<-&&&
State of
JU-lbOt
SORu Petitioner's address is omitted pursuant to statute.sides at
B.
Respondent herein residesCounty of
LQKer
C. Respondent stands in relationship to the Petitioner as:G Spouse: G Former spouse:
O
Child; G Stepchild;G Sharing or
f<
°£Jjj£^]L^&fiOBB«i ^ Having or allegedlya common ^WfilSrTflMflJQ having a child in common:
*
Parent;~ Other person related byWood or marriage.
PETITION FOR ORDER OF PROTECTION: 1 of 5 Pages
Afetirt.^^.r. ■.- ..~^.i.;.,i^.'^i^.a^
-COPY-LAKE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK-COPY--COPY-18 N. COUNTY WAUKEGAN IL-COPY-
171 37A
REV 9/89
l±i*t»i-,a»i-4, ,^A
nMta^i.
-■s.^tiSttS
ML
iCASE
NO.D Q There is no other pending court aciion involving the partiesOBJfl There is aiiothcr nending court action involving the parties mCounty of Myly?-. __-____,_known as Case No.
(
ttCr II 14E.'J&The Court has jurisdiction over the children because:
.(iL^J^JX JjJ**Jt-
.Court,
.'. State <>f ;p.U AJy \ *
Gb.
a 2.a 3.
C a.
Gb.
r-»-:• 4.
This stateis the home state of child at the nine of the commencement of this proceeding, orhad been the child's home stase within 6 months before commencement uf the proceeding and the child is absentfrom this State because of his removal or retention by a person claiming his custody or for other reasons, anda parent or person acting as parent continues to live in this State: ORIt is in the best interest of
the
child that a court of this State assume jurisdiction because the child and his parents.or the child and at least one contestant, have a significant connection with this State, and there is available inthis State substantial evidence concerning the child's present or future care, protection, training, and personalrelationships; ORThe child is physically present in this State andthe child has been abandoned, orit is necessaiy in
an
emergency to protect the child because he has been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse
or
is otherwise negSected or dependent. OR
It
appears that
no
other state
would have jurisdiction
under
prerequisites substantially in accordance with paragraphs
1.,
2.,
or 3.,
or
another state
has declined
to
exercise jurisdiction
on the
grounds that this State
is
the
more
appropriateforum to determine
the
custody
of
the
child,
and it
is
in
the best interest of
the
child that this Court
assume jurisdiction.
F.-fi
Venue in civil proceedings is appropriate Utecause:D Petitioner resides in the County of Lake. State of Illinois; ORD Respondent resides in the County of Lake, State of Illinois; OR□ The alleged abuse occurred in the County of Lake, State of Illinois; ORpaT The Petitioner is temporarily located in the County of Lake, State of Illinois, to avoid further abuse, and couldnot obtain safe and adequate temporary housing in the county of his/her residence.PETITIONER ALLEGES AS TO RESPONDENT THAT:O. J8 The following individuals are alleged to be persons who need to be protected from abuse by Respondent:
V4iQt?t*,\
MipfrftA;
Wlr&ty,
H. X Respondent has acted in the following manner towards the Petitioner:I. Details of incidents) of abuse (including time and place): _ , >
NfcS
smug
QrtQisjmtQ
W&?fra
Su-&n<£
octw*?^
A^>
o^m^
2 Effect of incidents) on Petitionerf incidemxs) pi
^^
j^M^pj>
r^ife,
000987000031
m
PETm0MF0R0RDERC
^^^'COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK-COPY-IcOPY-18 N. COUNTY WAUKEGAN IL-COPY-
t/t-37B REV. 9/89
*f-f
.
'
:
-jifo?A8fr*fc'ff
•
-
'
;
^'f'r'
:
.,';'
;;
'--'^
at"
•j
Kf"
a--
;
issv'
wr
f
:
"'
.Sir
ST''
IT
s*
:$
&-.>•■•
u
OR
Both parties have
a
right to occupancy. and. considering the risk
of
further abuse
by
Respondent interfering withthe Petitioner's safe and peaceful occupancy, the balance
of
hardships favors the Petitioner because of the following relevant-factors:O Availability, cost, safety, adequacy, location,
and
other characteristics
of
alternative housing
for
each partyand any minors
or
other dependents, and/orQ Effect
on
each party's employment, and/orO Other factors,
as
follows:^Respondent should
be
prohibited from entering
or
remaining present
at
Petitioner's school, place
of
employment
"*-*
>
toft* SkJfa-fr 4frM
6IA»0
flvr fei^o
■
or
i
")25
because:
^Respondent has
no
right
to
enter/remain present
at
such placets);
OR
'O The balance
of
hardships favors the Petitioner
in
prohibiting the Respondent from entering
or
remaining
at
such placets).K.
G
The
likelihood
of
future abuse would
be
minimized
by
appropriate counseling.L.
Q
There exists
a
danger that the minor child/ren will
be
removed from this jurisdiction
or
concealed within
the
Suite.M.
D
Unless Respondent
is
ordered to return or to not remove the minor child/ren. there exists a danger that the minor child/renwill
be:
□ Abused
or
neglected; and/orD Separated
in
an unwarranted manlier from the child's/children's primary caretaker; and/ori
D
Utiprotecte^aVwJhis/fcer/dwir well-being.
N.
$.
l*f\^J&\
-3»
H&l&t&fc
should
be
considered the primary caretaker
of
the minor child/renO.
Cj
Respondent has knowledge
of
toe^hereabowts
of
or access
to
the minor child/ren.** '•"'*
4
--
,3fi
T^r sho^d
be
srmtede^I^i^^t^$aisipa/)f the fojlowimnpersonal,:
"
icwwBsitTSKysvn^Tag^
TR-awer.
<dk^
.
iw.,
because:O Petitioner, but not Respondent, owns such property.
OR
C Sharing die property creates
a
further risk of abuse or is impractical, the balance of hardship favors temporarypossession
by
Petitioner,
and
D Petitioner and Respondent own the property jointly,
or
□ The property
is
alleged
to be
marital property
and a
proceeding
has
been Filed under
the
1MDMAQ.
Q
An Order
for
protection
of
the following personal property:should
be
granted because:Q Petitioner,
but not
Respondent, owns such property.
OR
C The balance
of
hardships favors Petitioner,
and
O Petitioner and Respondent own the property jointly,
or
O The.property
is
alleged
to be
marital property
and
a
proceeding
has
been filed under
the
IMDMA.D Petitioner does
not
have sufficient resources
to
support herself/himself, and/or
the
minor child/ren and Respondent
is
able
to
provide such support.G
As a
direct result
of
the above described abuse. Petitioner has suffered certain losses
and
incurred certain expenses.
-»
wmrn
s.
.u
-,..
p
Petitioner should be granted exclusive possession of the residence, the special venue rules ot *ec 2Wfh)
of
IDVA
(applicable
~>!
%•£ /
only
in
civil proceedings)
having been met. because:
*&i$:i
~~
Petitioner has
a
right
to
occupancy arid Respondent h;<s
no
right
to
occupancy.
I
■III llil
P&mpH f
OR ORDER
■
**
**"****•*»*
-*
*• *"
''W0^'-&^^-^
-COPY-LAKE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK-COPY-
^^^^^^^M-COPY-IB
N.
COUNTY WAUKEGAN IL-COPY-
t71-37C
r#l^#iiP
Add a Comment