Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
3:14-cv-00064 #72

3:14-cv-00064 #72

Ratings: (0)|Views: 14 |Likes:
Published by Equality Case Files
Doc 72 - Plaintiffs' proposed findings of fact in support of summary judgment
Doc 72 - Plaintiffs' proposed findings of fact in support of summary judgment

More info:

Published by: Equality Case Files on Mar 30, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/03/2014

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
VIRGINIA WOLF,
et al 
.,
Plaintiffs,vs.
SCOTT WALKER,
et al.
,
Defendants.Case No. 14-cv-64PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to this Court’s Procedure to Be Followed on Motions for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Virginia Wolf and Carol Schumacher, Kami Young and Karina Willes, Roy Badger and Garth Wangemann, Charvonne Kemp and Marie Carlson, Judith Trampf and Katharina Heyning, Salud Garcia and Pam Kleiss, William Hurtubise and Leslie (“Dean”) Palmer, and Johannes Wallmann and Keith Borden (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) submit the following proposed statement of record facts.
I.Jurisdiction and Venue
1.Plaintiffs bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to challenge the validity under the United States Constitution of Article XIII, § 13 of the Constitution of Wisconsin, and to redress deprivations of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States under color of State law. Answer of Defendant McDonell to Amended Complaint  ¶ 7 (Dkt # 61). 2.This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, which  provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” Answer of Defendant McDonell to
Case: 3:14-cv-00064-bbc Document #: 72 Filed: 03/24/14 Page 1 of 16
 
2Amended Complaint ¶ 7 (Dkt # 61); Answer of Defendant Czarnezki to Amended Complaint  ¶10 (Dkt # 63); Answer of Defendant Christensen to Amended Complaint ¶ 5 (Dkt # 69).3.This Court also has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3), which  provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person . . . [t]o redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States.” Answer of Defendant McDonell to Amended Complaint ¶ 7 (Dkt # 61); Answer of Defendant Czarnezki to Amended Complaint ¶10 (Dkt # 63); Answer of Defendant Christensen to Amended Complaint ¶ 5 (Dkt #69).4.Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because Defendants Walker, Van Hollen, Chandler, Anderson, McDonell, and King reside and have offices within the district and all Defendants reside in the State of Wisconsin, and because the events giving rise to Plaintiffs Wolf, Schumacher, Trampf, Heyning, Garcia, Kleiss, Wallmann and Borden’s claims occurred, and will occur, in this district.
 Declaration of Plaintiff Virginia Wolf in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Wolf Decl.
”),¶ 2;
 Declaration of  Plaintiff Carol Schumacher in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Schumacher Decl.
”), ¶ 2;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Judith Trampfin Support of Plaintiffs’  Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Trampf Decl.
”), ¶ 2;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Katharina  Heyning in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
 Heyning Decl.
”), ¶ 2;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Salud Garcia in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Garcia Decl.
”),¶ 2;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Pamela Kleiss in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Case: 3:14-cv-00064-bbc Document #: 72 Filed: 03/24/14 Page 2 of 16
 
3
Summary Judgment
(“
 Kleiss Decl.
),2;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Johannes Wallmann in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment 
(“
Wallmann Decl.
”), ¶ 2;
 Declaration of  Plaintiff Keith Borden in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
 Borden Decl.
”),  ¶ 2. Answer of Defendant McDonell to Amended Complaint 7 (Dkt # 61); Answer of Defendant Czarnezki to Amended Complaint ¶11 (Dkt # 63); Answer of Defendant Christensen to Amended Complaint ¶ 5 (Dkt # 69).
II. Plaintiffs
5.Plaintiffs Virginia Wolf and Carol Schumacher, Roy Badger and Garth Wangemann, Charvonne Kemp and Marie Carlson, Judith Trampf and Katharina Heyning, Salud Garcia and Pam Kleiss, William Hurtubise and Leslie Palmer, and Johannes Wallmann and Keith Borden are all loving, committed, same-sex couples.
Wolf Decl.
,4;
Schumacher Decl.
,  ¶4;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Kami Young in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Young Decl 
.”), ¶ 4;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Karina Willes in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Willes Decl 
.”), ¶ 4;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Roy Badger in Support of  Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
 Badger Decl.
”),¶ 5;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Garth Wangemann in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Wangemann Decl 
.”),¶ 5;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Charvonne Kemp in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary  Judgment
(“
 Kemp Decl.
”), ¶ 4;
 Declaration of Plaintiff Marie Carlson in Support of Plaintiffs’  Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
Carlson Decl.
”), ¶ 4;
Trampf Decl.
, ¶ 4;
 Heyning Decl.
, ¶ 4;
Garcia Decl.
,4;
 Kleiss Decl.
,4;
 Declaration of Plaintiff William Hurtubise in Support of  Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
 Hurtubise Decl.
”), ¶ 4;
 Declaration of Plaintiff  Leslie (“Dean”) Palmer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(“
 Palmer  Decl.
”), ¶ 4;
Wallmann Decl.
, ¶ 4;
 Borden Decl.
, ¶ 4.
Case: 3:14-cv-00064-bbc Document #: 72 Filed: 03/24/14 Page 3 of 16

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->