Sean Parker's Web 2.0 Summit Presentation

 
 
 
 
 

by TechCrunch

Value This
Doc 		Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 29 43
Words: 579 13640
Characters: 4037 81678
Lines: 158 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.97 5.99
Words per line: 3.66 21.89
Words per page: 19.97 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

15,982 Reads | 5 Comments

Description

No description. Ask the publisher to add a description

Powerpoint_16x16 29 Pages

Date Added

10/23/2009
Category
Tags

No tags.

Groups

Group_add

Awards

Award_star_gold_2 Featured Flame Rising

Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

david-eung-soo-kim-6316

I think I looking forward to see same situation. thank your presentation.

11 / 20 / 2009
Reply

helenwinslow

Another traffic report from the intersection of Art & Commerce. Required Reading! Don't be scared, subscribers, it's not too technical...and there's a cute slide of a chimp in there too.

11 / 10 / 2009
Reply
1aa62f6cba

JedDiamondPhD Replied: Helen, thanks for the encouragement to read. If the article is right, Scribd would do well to make it easier for us to network here. And for our followers to be more active in sharing their thoughts, comments, and evaluations. 11 / 10 / 2009

B258143281

helenwinslow Replied: one thing I have noticed, Jed, is this new function where your comments and replies connected to a particular doc show up in more than one place now, if you know what I mean, like all the relevant places--kind of all tied together. This is helpful but it also makes your every little thought more VISIBLE!! :) 11 / 10 / 2009

1aa62f6cba

JedDiamondPhD Replied: Helen, I wasn't aware comments now turned up in a number of places. Where else should I look. I'm fine with what I say turning up wherever people might want to read it. 11 / 10 / 2009

B258143281

helenwinslow Replied: well, here's a test drive for you. Although I am posting this as a reply to my OWN scribble that refers to Sean Parker's doc.....if you go look at the actual doc right now, you will see this whole thread replicated there. That didn't happen before; before, the only things that would have appeared as comments under his doc--would have been actual comments to the actual doc. Does this make sense? 11 / 10 / 2009

davidcushman

Sean, agree with all the sentiment. Couple of points though. I didn't see a slide on Reed's law (the 2n formula which explains the exponential value growth in large networks - particularly ones with humans involved). Also, you can make the case for google being a people-powered connector all of its own - getting connections beyond the silo is what really counts (when one extra node on the network doubles its value) so search is still very very important in that regard.

10 / 27 / 2009
Reply

brentjo

Interesting and very true. This is why I canceled myspace.com. The power of a network is the single biggest reason why some will make it and some will not.

10 / 26 / 2009
Reply

blue-interactive

and here it is attached

10 / 26 / 2009
Reply