REPORT FROM SPRINGSCIENTIFIC MEETINGFriday 6th May 2005“The McEwen Report– The Way Forward”
Dr. Ruhy Parris chaired the morningsession.
Dr. Nicola Stuckey
started thesession with a summary of the
16recommendations of the McEwenreport
. Due to lack of space, these can be found on the NBPA website.
Dr. Mick Serpell
, from Glasgow,followed Nicola with
“The 10 PointPlan”
, reporting an action plan for Scotland which had been formulated bya Working Party on Pain consisting of members from pain medicine,rheumatology, pharmacy, QualityImprovement Scotland (QIS), PainAssociation Scotland (PAS) and primarycare. The 10 action points are as follows:-1.There should be full commitment tothe declaration that pain relief is ahuman right. (WHO, Geneva, 11October 2004)2.The social and financial impact of chronic pain needs to be recognisedand the necessary resources for effective management should be ahigh priority on the health agenda for Scotland.3.Health Service providers andcommissioners should implementintegrated care pathways for chronic pain, which involve community, primary and secondary care.4.Education in the management of painshould form part of the corecurriculum for doctors, nurses, alliedand other health care professionals.5.Health service providers andcommissioners should make acommitment to provision of trainingin pain management for all healthcare professionals.6.To improve services for people withchronic pain the NHS should work with the voluntary sector.7.Management of chronic pain should be patient-centred in partnership withhealthcare professionals.8.People in all geographical areasshould have equality of access toappropriate services for themanagement of their pain.9.Evidence-based pain management and best clinical practice should be usedand audited by the healthcare providers.10.Research into pain managementshould be promoted and conducted tofill the current evidence gaps.These action points fit in well with therecommendations of the McEwen report.
Dr. Gavin Gordon, ConsultantAnaesthetist
from Glasgow gave the nexttalk of the day on
‘Managed ClinicalNetworks’
.Dr. Gordon is a keen Aberdeensupporter and he started by looking back on a glorious year for the Dons – 1983.Quite how he managed to link this in to atalk on Managed Clinical Networks Ican’t remember. He recounted theGlasgow experience. Glasgow has a population of 866,000 and has over 20medical chronic pain sessions with somenursing, physiotherapy and psychologyinput. The Victoria Infirmary areacatchment borders Lanarkshire.Lanarkshire has a population of 533, 000and only has 3 medical sessions for chronic pain. It is this type of geographical inequality that it is hopedManaged Clinical Networks will address.A Managed Clinical Network(MCN) isa way of working. The model should bedeveloped by a partnership of patients,clinicians and managers and thereforeshould be effective in delivering care ina local context. A MCN focuses on adisease or condition. The purpose of aMCN is to improve patient care byimproving access, quality and co-ordination. Work undertaken is evidence based, outcomes are measured and anannual report is produced. Networks aremultiprofessional with patientinvolvement.What would the advantages of a MCNfor pain management services? At present,there is little co-ordination of staff between primary, secondary and tertiarycare. There is a lack of clarity of roles.Referral patterns to secondary care painclinics are haphazard depending onindividual General Practitioners andclinic guidelines. There is a lack of evidence base for many of the treatmentsused in a pain clinic and concerns aboutthe use of resources.Several MCNs have already beendeveloped in Scotland, the mostcomprehensive being diabetes, stroke andischaemic heart disease. Others include palliative care, epilepsy and vascular services.While MCNs are not a directmechanism for increasing your budget,they are a mechanism for implementingstandards (SIGN, NQIS) and they do fitin neatly with the recommendations of McEwan. Downsides to MCNs are manytime consuming meetings, difficulties inengaging primary care and potentialfriction between specialists andgeneralists. NBPA President,
Dr. Nicola Stuckey
then spoke on
“The McEwen Report onChronic Pain services in Scotland – apsychological perspective”
.Eight of the mainland boards havededicated psychologists in their painservices. Lothian has the highest number. No other board is near the 1994recommendation of 1 whole timeequivalent psychologist per 200,000 of the population.Professor McEwen recognised thecomplex case-mix in chronic pain and theimportance of ensuring appropriate staff and resources are available. Herecommended that pain management programmes should be provided by eachhealth board and that training andemployment of generic pain professionalsshould be examined.There is a national shortage of staff inall areas of psychology but funding issuesrather than recruitment difficulties isoften the problem. Current postgraduatetrainees are keen to do placements inchronic pain which may help recruitmentin the future.317 clinical and applied psychologistswork in Scotland. There are 61 places inScotland for postgraduate training in psychology.Of people with chronic pain attendingthe pain management programme, 25%were moderately depressed and 22%severely depressed. 47% had a mediumto high fear of harm and damage fromactivity with 66% requiring individualwork rather than a group PMP.There were high levels of suicidalideation, post traumatic stress disorder, previous sexual and physical abuse,relationship and family breakdown,driven behaviour, heightened anxiety andanger control issues. Nicola concluded that all boardsshould provide adequate psychologycoverage for their population.Appropriate triage of patients shouldoccur which will require significant psychological input. Research skillsshould be encouraged to provide a clear evidence base for psychologicaltreatment.
Dr. Nicola Stuckey and Professor Ian Power
The next talk was given by yours trulyand was titled
“The Integration of Primary and Secondary Care for theManagement of Chronic Pain”
.Many of the themes had been coveredin previous talks. The merits of primaryand secondary care were contrasted anda case history involving Granpaw Broongetting the shingles used to illustratesome of the deficiencies incommunication between these two
Dorothy Grace Elder addresses the meeting
Leave a Comment