2
© Thunder Road Report - 1 June 2009
B
Gold (GLD + 2.04%) and silver (SLV + 3.62%) continued their ascent, particularly strong since Thursday
morning, the fundamentals too compelling to ignore;
B
A rare combination of major bond strength (TLT + 2.23%) and extreme dollar weakness (Euro ETF FXE+ 1.36%);
B
An unbelievable buy-on-close program, which drove the S&P futures +2% in ve minutes, which left us
shaking our heads at the co-ordination with Tout TV’s usual talking heads; and
B
The Financials (XLF +1.42%) are coiling, getting ready for a large move – one way or the other.
But think, now that Government leaders have taken center stage, with promises everywhere; has
government ever come up with the most efcient, most cost-effective solution? Wasn’t government in
league with bankers to blame for this mess?Most people lost nearly -50% of their net worth over the past 18 months. A week ago I remarked that
promoters were coming out in ocks. This appears to be the start of Silly Season – a bit like the summer of
1987. Please don’t start swinging for the fence, attempting to get back what is “rightfully” yours. Instead,think singles and doubles, minimizing risk while ringing the register.”
Demographics, stock market earnings and food/energy
A blog I’ve started to follow is “Nathan’s Economic Edge” at economicedge.blogspot.com. Recently he wrotea piece (here) on demographics and the work of Harry S. Dent in particular. At the beginning he considersthe extent that demographics impacts economics, highlighting the quote from David Foot in his book, “Boom, Bust & Echo”: “Demographics explain about two-thirds of everything: which products will be in demand, where jobopportunities will occur, what school enrolments will be, when house values will rise or drop, what kinds of food people will buy and what kinds of cars they will drive.” Nathan argues (correctly I think) that the impact of demographics is far less than two-thirds as there are somany other factors that “comprise the economic brew that add up to prosperity of lack thereof”. One factor
he mentions is the rule of law (i.e. contracts with integrity), and I want to go off briey on a tangent here.
Regarding countries without the rule of law, Nathan argues that they: “are far more likely to be poor because their rule-shifting drives capital away.” I thought it was very interesting how Obama bulldozed through bankruptcy law in respect of the demotionof Chrysler’s secured creditors vis-a-vis their unsecured counterparts with stronger political connections. It
augurs badly for condence in the US, just at the moment when it needs more nance than ever before.Back to demographics and the subject of world population, the growth of which is rmly in its exponentialphase. The planet is currently adding one billion people every 13-14 years and the population could doubleagain by 2040. On a daily basis, the world population is increasing by 211,000 people daily. This is shown
in chart for below:
Leave a Comment