Missiles
Regarding missiles, we have received information that is too sensitive, for the sources, to reveal, but we arenow more convinced than ever that the SPDC has ballistic missiles.We can disclose that there is a report that the highway near Minhla is closed once or twice a month for missile test firing. Local roads are also closed. This creates a restricted area for the flight path that is sixtymiles long. Tests have been underway for the last three years.Also, near Hle Gu, just north of Rangoon, two small hills, side-by-side, have been bridged by a large roof and then covered with dirt and plants. Local villagers were told that heavy weapons are stored underneaththe roof. Long cylinders, the diameter of bullock cart wheels, and covered by tarps, were transported there.
Summary
The information in this and our November report presents a sketchy picture of the SPDC’s nuclear program. The people of Burma were surprised at the opulence of the marriage of Than Shwe’s daughter.We believe there would be a similar degree of astonishment were all the details of the SPDC’s nuclear ambitions known, including all the assistance the junta is receiving from North Korea, Iran, Russia andChina (and also from the Pakistani nuclear scientists who took refuge in Burma in 2001).Moreover, we believe that such details are known, by the international intelligence community (certainly by U.S. intelligence agencies). Any decent intelligence initiative directed at North Korea and Iran, and alsoRussia and China, would reveal links to Burma, which would then become subjects of investigation in their own right. Sources including human intelligence, the types of sources intelligence professionals with large budgets should be able to cultivate inside a target like the SPDC, and also remote sensing – uraniumactivities create a distinct “signature,” would no doubt yield a far more complete picture than what we have been able to present.This leads one to question why such a picture has not been publicly disclosed, with the only logical answer being that if the world knew of the SPDC’s nuclear threat to international security and peace, not only thethreat it presents through the spillover effects of its massive internal repression, diplomats would be forcedto act.The SPDC having radioactive materials is a threat of the greatest possible magnitude, and in many differentways.The international community prefers to ignore problems wherever possible, but the resistance to action onBurma also reflects a vested interest by the West not to strain relations with the SPDC’s patron, China (andalso relations with Russia). More generally, diplomats, and political leaders as a class, refuse to divulgesecret information until it suits them personally, not the interests of the public, if ever.This means we must force the issue. Just as by investigating and documenting the SPDC’s crimes againsthumanity Burma pro-democracy activists convinced the international community, grudgingly, to acceptthat they were taking place, so too will we have to force recognition of its nuclear program and theaccompanying danger to world security and peace.
The SPDC and Thailand
Lastly, we have learned that the SPDC has a contingency plan to create a military incident with Thailand,in the event that a significant popular uprising inside Burma develops. Such an incident would shift thefocus, both internally and externally, away from the uprising, and also justify a draconian crackdown,similar to the 1988 massacre.This claim is supported by the recent designation by Than Shwe of Thailand as Burma’s nearest enemy.
Leave a Comment