3. Records to be inspected
a. Uniting court files
Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”, and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files in this case:
(1) 804/0-12 - United File, and
(2) 6804/0-12 – Administrative Union;
And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to “Related Files”, relative to instant court file.
b. Summonses, and/or Notices to Appear in Court
Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records, pertaining to hearings on the following dates:
(1) July 21, 2011;
(2) September 10, 2012, and
(3) June 19, 2013;
And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in this case.
4. Purpose of inspection and justification:
(1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect in instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1]
(2) On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2]
(3) On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court of Justice office in order to inspect and to copy the above referenced file. In two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found as legal foundation for the operations in the court file:
a. Uniting of Files, and
b. Notices to Appear in Court.
In response to a request to inspect the corresponding data in the High Court of Justice staff terminal, it was discovered::
a. Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”:
During the visit the Undersigned was told (including demonstrations on the screen) by High Court of Justice staff that no control data or reference data could be viewed from the High Court of Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under “Related Court Files”.
b. Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records
During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the “Notice to Appear in Court” records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates.
(4) Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work in general, and case management system of the courts in particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access to:
a. The requested control data, relative to “Related Court Files”, and
b. The “Notice to Appear in Court” records.
(5) Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under 3, above. Such records are integral parts of the above referenced court file.
LINKS:
[1] 14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice – Request to Inspect Court File // מוטי אשכנזי ו-76 אח' נ שרת המשפטים ואח' ׁׁׂ( בג"ץ 2300/11) – בקשה לעיון בתיק
http://www.scribd.com/doc/210599367/
[2] 14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice - Request to Inspect court file - - Permitted
http://www.scribd.com/doc/215296312/
5. Relationship of the Requester to the court file:
No relationship except for academic interest.
Original Title
2014-04-08 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice and Director of the Enforcement and Collection Authority (2300/11) - Repeat request to inspect court file
3. Records to be inspected
a. Uniting court files
Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”, and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files in this case:
(1) 804/0-12 - United File, and
(2) 6804/0-12 – Administrative Union;
And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to “Related Files”, relative to instant court file.
b. Summonses, and/or Notices to Appear in Court
Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records, pertaining to hearings on the following dates:
(1) July 21, 2011;
(2) September 10, 2012, and
(3) June 19, 2013;
And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in this case.
4. Purpose of inspection and justification:
(1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect in instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1]
(2) On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2]
(3) On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court of Justice office in order to inspect and to copy the above referenced file. In two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found as legal foundation for the operations in the court file:
a. Uniting of Files, and
b. Notices to Appear in Court.
In response to a request to inspect the corresponding data in the High Court of Justice staff terminal, it was discovered::
a. Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”:
During the visit the Undersigned was told (including demonstrations on the screen) by High Court of Justice staff that no control data or reference data could be viewed from the High Court of Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under “Related Court Files”.
b. Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records
During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the “Notice to Appear in Court” records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates.
(4) Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work in general, and case management system of the courts in particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access to:
a. The requested control data, relative to “Related Court Files”, and
b. The “Notice to Appear in Court” records.
(5) Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under 3, above. Such records are integral parts of the above referenced court file.
LINKS:
[1] 14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice – Request to Inspect Court File // מוטי אשכנזי ו-76 אח' נ שרת המשפטים ואח' ׁׁׂ( בג"ץ 2300/11) – בקשה לעיון בתיק
http://www.scribd.com/doc/210599367/
[2] 14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice - Request to Inspect court file - - Permitted
http://www.scribd.com/doc/215296312/
5. Relationship of the Requester to the court file:
No relationship except for academic interest.
3. Records to be inspected
a. Uniting court files
Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”, and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files in this case:
(1) 804/0-12 - United File, and
(2) 6804/0-12 – Administrative Union;
And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to “Related Files”, relative to instant court file.
b. Summonses, and/or Notices to Appear in Court
Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records, pertaining to hearings on the following dates:
(1) July 21, 2011;
(2) September 10, 2012, and
(3) June 19, 2013;
And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in this case.
4. Purpose of inspection and justification:
(1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect in instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1]
(2) On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2]
(3) On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court of Justice office in order to inspect and to copy the above referenced file. In two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found as legal foundation for the operations in the court file:
a. Uniting of Files, and
b. Notices to Appear in Court.
In response to a request to inspect the corresponding data in the High Court of Justice staff terminal, it was discovered::
a. Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”:
During the visit the Undersigned was told (including demonstrations on the screen) by High Court of Justice staff that no control data or reference data could be viewed from the High Court of Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under “Related Court Files”.
b. Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records
During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the “Notice to Appear in Court” records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates.
(4) Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work in general, and case management system of the courts in particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access to:
a. The requested control data, relative to “Related Court Files”, and
b. The “Notice to Appear in Court” records.
(5) Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under 3, above. Such records are integral parts of the above referenced court file.
LINKS:
[1] 14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice – Request to Inspect Court File // מוטי אשכנזי ו-76 אח' נ שרת המשפטים ואח' ׁׁׂ( בג"ץ 2300/11) – בקשה לעיון בתיק
http://www.scribd.com/doc/210599367/
[2] 14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice - Request to Inspect court file - - Permitted
http://www.scribd.com/doc/215296312/
5. Relationship of the Requester to the court file:
No relationship except for academic interest.
nnmn 45 . By certified mail, Israel Post, April 8, 2014 To Attorney Dov Even Or: RC032255038IL To State Attorney: RC032255069IL Repeat and Detailed Request to Inspect Court File 1. Requester's details: Full name: Joseph Zernik, PhD ID: 05362559-6 Address: Phone: PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv N/A 2. Court file details: Court file no.: HCJ 2300/11 Parties: Moti Ashkenazi+ 76 others v Minister of Justice and Director of the Execution and Enforcement Authority. 3. Records to be inspected a. Uniting court files Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under "Related Court Files", and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files in this case: (1) 804/0-12 -United File, and (2) 6804/0-12- Administrative Union; And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to "Related Files", relative to instant court file. b. Summonses, and/or Notices to Appear in Court Three "Notice to Appear in Court" records, pertaining to hearings on the following dates: (1) July21,2011; (2) September 10,2012, and (3) June 19, 2013; And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in this case. 4. Purpose of inspection and justification: (1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect in instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1] (2) On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2] (3) On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court of Justice office in order to inspect and to copy the above referenced file. In two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found as legal foundation for the operations in the court file: a. Uniting of Files, and b. Noti ces to Appear in Court. In response to a request to inspect the corresponding data in the High Court of Justice staff terminal , it was discovered:: a. Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under "Related Court Files": Duri ng the visit the Undersigned was told (including demonstrations on the screen) by High Court of Justice staff that no control data or 1 I 3 reference data could be viewed from the High Court of Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under "Related Court Files". b. Three "Notice to Appear in Court" records During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the "Notice to Appear in Court" records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates. (4) Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work in general, and case management system of the courts in particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access to: a. The requested control data, relative to "Related Court Files", and b. The "Notice to Appear in Court" records. (5) Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under 3, above. Such records are integral parts of the above referenced court file. LINKS: [1)14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice- Request to Inspect Court File// m\U J 'nN. 76-1 'TDIUN. um jl'n::J. l1'l!'7 il\Ujl:l- (2300/11 y".u Joc'K':l 'nN.I D'lJ91Unil http://www.scribd.com/doc/21 0599367 I [2)14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice- Request to Inspect court file-- Permitted http://www.scribd.com/doc/215296312/ 5. Relationship of the Requester to the court file: No relationship except for academic interest. Data: March 8, 2014 Requester's Signature 2003-:\" 0ll.m ,(o'p'n::J P'Y) i111::JY7J' 1i1 'n::J1 'n::J m1pn (().)4 mpn) ,2 o::,m .1 t']OI' 'l'l : l'\7;-) OlV 05362559-6 : m;n '0;-) :l':lN-'m ,33407 1n : n:nm I'N: ' Oi) : n'::l p'n .2 2300/11 y"n : P'Yi1 lVj71:J,"J 1:llV n':l p'n 'o;o:: nJIUl '7ilmJ D'lJ91U)')il liU J 0'901J D'lnJY 76+TDIUN 'lJ))') : j?'n:J t:;'ii:Si1 il":l.:lill il9')Nil 2 /3 t D',l\!lj7 D'j7'n .N. j7'n::l D'.!J'91Y.li1 ,D'Jim mri1 (1';!1'7i1 InTI Dl' ,1Unmuni1 DIU) i1lj7::l'Jim :"D'l11Uj7 D'j7'n" nnn 'JillJj7'7Ni1 lnJNn j7'n - 804/0-12 (1) '7i1m lin'?<- 6804/0-12 (2) .i1r j7'n'7 .!J;!In D'j7'ni111n'N D'lnN D"lJI9'1U D')non '7) INII 1 1 1'7 iUrlTi'l IN/I 09\Urli'l n::t'7 i'llrlTi'l .:l :DI'Y) D'll'l'::l;\'7 "p1'1 i1JYJTi1" '::ln) i11UI'71UI ;2011 , 1 '71''7 21 (1) ;2012 ,l::lY)lJ90'7 1 0 (2) ;2013 ,']1''719 (3) '71U lJI9'1Ui1 nDr'7 0'0::li1 nN ,lJ91UY) i1 n::1'7 i1JnTi1'7 i1YJIIi1 lnN ::ln) '7) IN/I .i1r j7'n::l : m,N t,'Yl'l .4 i1'7'7)::11 ,i1r j7'n::lp'.!J'7 i11Uj7::1 i1lJn Dlnni1 IU';Ii1 ,2014 ,lNil::l9'7 20-i1 Dl'::l (1) [1] .'JillJj7'7Ni1 j7'n::lll"Ji1 j7'n::l D'::ln)i1 l\UN II''7.!Ji1 lJ91Uni1 n::1 N'IUJ '71U i1lJ'7ni1 i1Jm ,2014 ,yln'7 27-i1 Dl'::l (2) [2] .'7"Ji1 j7'n::lii'.!J i1l'nni1 j7'n::li".!J'7 i1llJYJ::l y"n nn)m::l i1lJn Dlnni1lj7'::12014 ,y1n'1 31-i1 Dl'::l (3) ni'71.!J9'7 0'0::1) l"Ji1 j7'n::l D'::ln) '7) N'7 ,i1T j7'n::lll0' ']"].!J ']IU::l .'7"Ji1 :i1r j7'n::l ,D'j7'ni1 lln'N .N ,p1'1 n1mri1 .::11 ,nll')TY)i1 C)IOY)::l i1'7N D'::ln)::l l".!J'7 i1lJY) Dlnni1 '71U ln1Uj7::1 '7.!J i1::11An::l . D'li'91Yli1 ,D'ltnl nlTi'l JrlTI Dl' 1 \!lrln\!lrli'l D\!1) i'l,j7:l 'ltnl .N. :"c.,l\!lj7 cj7n" nnn 'lllOj7'7Ni1 j7'n:l n1Nl'7 1n'J l'XIU ,y"n 'l::li.!J ".!J 1'1 DAIIi11 i1lJn Dmn'7 lYJNJ ,'7"Ji1 lllj7'::1 n11::1 nnn D'.!J'91Y.li1 D'JinJi1 Nn)nox 1x i1lj7::1 'JinJ '7) nn)m C)lonn ."D'li\Uj7 D'j7'n" "JI'"T'7 i'llrlTi'l" ::tnJ i'l\!11'7\!1 .:l "p1'1 i1mri1"i1 '::ln)IU 'l::lllJ ".!J D;!lli11 i1lJn Dmn'7 lYJNJ ,i1T lllj7'::1 n.!J::l l'li1 Dl' 1nx'1 D'IU';!J n'7::1'7 D')91i1 'n::l '71i1'J'7 nDl.lJY)I ,'7'7)::1 D'JinJ nDl.lJY) nJ'7lJI9 l':::l.Y)i1 ,nlJil::l DIN. '7) (4) i11U';! IU' ,nNr n)llJYJ::l nl''7i1mi1 ni'Dnoi1 '7lJ::l'71U ,'?<11::1 j7'0' ,lJl9::llJ91Un ::::N'7 ?14-fl::lt"l Z!J2J -1 "D',IIUj7 D'j7'n" '::1;1'7 D'IUj71::1Y)i1 D']Jn] , .N ."11'1'7 i1mri1" i1 '::ln)'7 .::1 D'::ln) .'7lJ'7 .3 nnn llJli91U D'Jinnl D'::ln)::ll"lJ'7 i1lJn Dlnni1 1Uj7::ln 1)'9'7 (5) .'7"Ji1 y"n j7'nn ll9J n'1::1 j7'7n Di1i1'7N :D',I\!I'j7 '7.!J'7 ,U?i' ?::l J":l? Kl) fl':J j:''fl? ?U? ,U?j:'l"' .5 .'NY)Ij7Nil I"J.!J'7 lJl9 l\Uj7 '7) I'N 2014 , s : 1'11'\n 3/3
2015-10-07 Amos Baranes v State of Israel (3032/99) Request for Deletion of Magistrate Lubinsky's August 17, 2015 decision, denied filing, refiled as Request for Reconsideration // ברנס נ מדינת ישראל (3032/99) בקשה למחיקת החלטת הרשם לובינסקי מיום 17 לאוגוסט, שנדחתה מרישום, והוגשה לרישום מחדש כבקשה לעיון חוזר.
2017-11-05 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – false and misleading Ministry of Interior FOIA response, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – תשובה שקרית ומטעה של משרד הפנים על בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע
2012-05-31 Ombudsman of the Judiciary decision 88/12/Tel-Aviv District in the Judge Varda Alshech "Fabricated Protocols" affair // החלטת נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים 88/12/מחוזי תל-אביב בפרשת "הפרוטוקולים המפוברקים" של השופטת ורדה אלשייך
0000-00-00 State of Israel v Ariel, Klass and Zernik (36318-08-19) Public Defender’s office false response on inquiry - undated, no reference number, no case number // מ"י נ אריאל קלס וצרניק (36318-08-19) - תשובה שקרית על פניה לסנגוריה הציבורית - ללא תאריך, ללא מספר אסמכתה, ללא מספר תיק
2018-11-08 Zernik, J. "Cyber & Law - Israel as a case study - presentation in Univ of Goettingen law school colloquium // סייבר ומשפט - ישראל כמקרה בוחן - מצגת בקולוקוויום בבי"ס למשפטים, אוניברסיטת גטינגן, גרמניה
2018-05-24 Refusal to accept repeat request to Central Election Committee Chair, Justice Hanan Melcer’s response on inquiry, asking him to perform his reporting duties// סירוב לקבל בקשה חוזרת לתשובת יו"ר ועדת הבחירות המרכזית, שופט בית המשפט העליון חנן מלצר על בקשה למילוי חובת הדיווח
2018-02-19 Central Election Committee: FOIA request (No 2/0219/18) - Supreme Court Justices, protocols, appointments // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (מס’ 2/0219/18) לגבי שופטי בית המשפט העליון, פרוטוקולים, מינויים
2017-09-12 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה (מס’ ) על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-10-01 Zernik v State of Israel et al (7631/17) – criminal appeal – in the Supreme Court – Notice of Appeal and Appeal // צרניק נ מדינת ישראל ואח' (7631/17) – ערעור פלילי – בבית המשפט העליון – הודעת ערעור וערעור
2017-10-22 Inquiry with Shin-Bet Head Nadav Argaman – failure of the Ministry of Interior to comply with FOIA, in re: computerization of the election system // פנייה לראש השב"כ נדב ארגמן בעניין מחשוב מערכת הבחירות – אי קיום חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים
2017-10-22 Request for compliance with FOIA by Ministry of Interior, in re: Public Committee for Review of Computerization of the Election System // בקשה לקיום הוראות חוק חופש המידע על ידי משרד הפנים בנוגע לוועדה לבחינת מחשוב מערכת הבחירות
2017-09-12 Ministry of Interior: Freedom of Information Request (No ) regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee and Ombudsman’s reports // משרד הפנים: בקשה (מס’ )על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית ודוחות מבקר המדינה
2017-09-06 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Supreme Court) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לבית המשפט העליון)
2017-09-07 Central Election Committee: Request for Chairman, Justice Hanan Melcer to perform his duties and ascertain compliance with FOIA (sent to the Committee) // ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה לשופט בית המשפט העליון, יו”ר הוועדה חנן מלצר למלא את תפקידו ולוודא שהוועדה מקיימת את חוק חופש המידע (נשלח לוועדה)
2017-09-06 National Cyber Security Authority: Inquiry regarding guiding and certification of government IT systems, security standards online publication // הרשות הלאומית להגנת הסייבר: פנייה לגבי הנחיה ואישור מערכות מידע ממשלתיות, פרסום ברשת בעניין תקני אבטחת מערכות מידע
2017-09-03 Central Election Committee: Freedom of Information Request regarding IT systems of the Central Election Committee – protocols of the Tender Committee ועדת הבחירות המרכזית: בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע לגבי מחשוב ועדת הבחירות המרכזית - פרוטוקולים של ועדת המכרזים
2017-09-05 FOIA Request (-2017) on Ministry of Justice, in re: Authority to sign decisions of Ombudsman of the Judiciary // בקשה על פי חוק חופש המידע (-2017) למשרד המשפטים לגבי סמכות חתימה על החלטות נציב תלונות הציבור על השופטים