Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2014-04-08 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice and Director of the Enforcement and Collection Authority (2300/11) - Repeat request to inspect court file

2014-04-08 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice and Director of the Enforcement and Collection Authority (2300/11) - Repeat request to inspect court file

Ratings: (0)|Views: 14|Likes:
3. Records to be inspected
a. Uniting court files
Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”, and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files in this case:
(1) 804/0-12 - United File, and
(2) 6804/0-12 – Administrative Union;
And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to “Related Files”, relative to instant court file.
b. Summonses, and/or Notices to Appear in Court
Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records, pertaining to hearings on the following dates:
(1) July 21, 2011;
(2) September 10, 2012, and
(3) June 19, 2013;
And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in this case.

4. Purpose of inspection and justification:
(1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect in instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1]
(2) On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2]
(3) On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court of Justice office in order to inspect and to copy the above referenced file. In two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found as legal foundation for the operations in the court file:
a. Uniting of Files, and
b. Notices to Appear in Court.
In response to a request to inspect the corresponding data in the High Court of Justice staff terminal, it was discovered::
a. Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”:
During the visit the Undersigned was told (including demonstrations on the screen) by High Court of Justice staff that no control data or reference data could be viewed from the High Court of Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under “Related Court Files”.
b. Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records
During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the “Notice to Appear in Court” records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates.
(4) Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work in general, and case management system of the courts in particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access to:
a. The requested control data, relative to “Related Court Files”, and
b. The “Notice to Appear in Court” records.
(5) Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under 3, above. Such records are integral parts of the above referenced court file.

LINKS:
[1] 14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice – Request to Inspect Court File // מוטי אשכנזי ו-76 אח' נ שרת המשפטים ואח' ׁׁׂ( בג"ץ 2300/11) – בקשה לעיון בתיק
http://www.scribd.com/doc/210599367/
[2] 14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice - Request to Inspect court file - - Permitted
http://www.scribd.com/doc/215296312/

5. Relationship of the Requester to the court file:
No relationship except for academic interest.
3. Records to be inspected
a. Uniting court files
Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”, and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files in this case:
(1) 804/0-12 - United File, and
(2) 6804/0-12 – Administrative Union;
And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to “Related Files”, relative to instant court file.
b. Summonses, and/or Notices to Appear in Court
Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records, pertaining to hearings on the following dates:
(1) July 21, 2011;
(2) September 10, 2012, and
(3) June 19, 2013;
And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction of the High Court of Justice in this case.

4. Purpose of inspection and justification:
(1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect in instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1]
(2) On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2]
(3) On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court of Justice office in order to inspect and to copy the above referenced file. In two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found as legal foundation for the operations in the court file:
a. Uniting of Files, and
b. Notices to Appear in Court.
In response to a request to inspect the corresponding data in the High Court of Justice staff terminal, it was discovered::
a. Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under “Related Court Files”:
During the visit the Undersigned was told (including demonstrations on the screen) by High Court of Justice staff that no control data or reference data could be viewed from the High Court of Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under “Related Court Files”.
b. Three “Notice to Appear in Court” records
During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the “Notice to Appear in Court” records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates.
(4) Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work in general, and case management system of the courts in particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access to:
a. The requested control data, relative to “Related Court Files”, and
b. The “Notice to Appear in Court” records.
(5) Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under 3, above. Such records are integral parts of the above referenced court file.

LINKS:
[1] 14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice – Request to Inspect Court File // מוטי אשכנזי ו-76 אח' נ שרת המשפטים ואח' ׁׁׂ( בג"ץ 2300/11) – בקשה לעיון בתיק
http://www.scribd.com/doc/210599367/
[2] 14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and 76 others v Minister of Justice et al (2300/11) in the High Court of Justice - Request to Inspect court file - - Permitted
http://www.scribd.com/doc/215296312/

5. Relationship of the Requester to the court file:
No relationship except for academic interest.

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Apr 08, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/18/2014

pdf

text

original

 
r
7N l
'lH
l'W'Tt.l
0nvr m
m.:1n?mn
"' l\ J~
l1' l v'1l lll'Y
tl\ Jf7 l
()PYD
.rmpn7
n~tnn J
((())
4 mpn) z
tJ )1\J)
rnm
'OD
A
r
j
.
Otf/ot,hol -1
'
·
n?[
I
l lNf,
4 1
 
5
· ·
~wm
nnmn
.
(~
By certified mail, Israel Post, April 8, 2014 To Attorney Dov Even Or: RC032255038IL To State Attorney: RC032255069IL
 
Repeat
and
Detailed
Request
to
Inspect
Court
File
1.
Requester s
details:
Full
name:
Joseph
Zernik,
PhD
ID:
05362559-6
Address:
Phone: PO Box 33407, Tel Aviv N/A
2
Court
file details:
Court
file
no.: HCJ 2300/11 Parties: Moti Ashkenazi+ 76 others v Minister
of
Justice and Director
of
the Execution and Enforcement Authority.
3 Records to
be
inspected
a.
Uniting
court
files
Control data (user ID, login date, time) for data entries under Related Court Files , and/or any other records, which provide the judicial foundation for uniting court files
in
this case: (1) 804/0-12 -United File, and (2)
6804/0-12-
Administrative Union; And/or any other judicial records, pertaining to Related Files , relative to instant court file.
b.
Summonses, and/or
Notices
to
Appear in Court
Three Notice
to
Appear
in
Court records, pertaining
to
hearings on the following dates: (1)
July21,2011;
(2) September 10,2012, and (3) June
19,
2013; And/or any other record, akin to summons, which provides the foundation for jurisdiction
of
the High Court
of
Justice
in
this case.
4
Purpose of
inspection
and
justification:
(1) On February 20, 2014, the Undersigned filed Request to Inspect
in
instant court file, including both paper and electronic records. [1]
2)
On March 27, 2014, Presiding Justice Asher Grunis issued a Decision granting the request to inspect. [2]
3)
On March 31, 2014, the Undersigned visited the High Court
of
Justice office
in
order
to
inspect and
to
copy the above referenced file.
In
two fundamental matters, no paper documents were found
as
legal foundation for the operations
in
the court file:
a.
Uniting
of
Files, and
b.
Notices to Appear
in
Court.
In
res
ponse to a request
to
ins
pect the
co
rresponding data
in
the High Court
of
Justice staff terminal,
it
was discovered::
a.
Control
data
(user
ID,
login
date,
time)
for
data
entries
under
Related Court Files :
Duri
ng
the visit the Undersigned was told (includi
ng
demonstrations on the screen) by Hi
gh
Court of Justi
ce
staff that
no
control data or
1 3
 
reference data could
be
viewed from the High Court
of
Justice staff terminal, relative to the entries under Related Court Files . b. Three
Notice
to
Appear
in
Court
records
During the visit the Undersigned was told by High Court of Justice staff that the Notice to Appear
in
Court records became inaccessible after the respective hearing dates.
(4)
Any reasonable person, who understands how data systems work
in
general, and case management system
of
the courts
in
particular, would surely conclude that a person, who holds the administrative authority for the system, has access
to:
a.
The requested control data, relative to Related Court Files , and
b.
The Notice to Appear
in
Court records.
(5)
Therefore, the Undersigned requests to inspect the records and data, which are listed under
3,
above. Such records are integral parts
of
the above referenced court file.
LINKS:
[1)14-02-20 Moti Ashkenazi and
76
others v Minister
of
Justice et
al
(2300/11)
in
the High Court of
Justice-
Request to Inspect Court
File//
m\U
J 'nN.
76-1
'TDIUN.
•um
jl'n::J.
l1'l '7
il\Ujl:l-
(2300/11
y .u
J
oc'K':l
'nN.I
D lJ91Unil
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21 0599367 [2)14-03-27 Moti Ashkenazi and
76
others v Minister of Justice et
al
(2300/11)
in
the High Court
of
Justi
ce-
Request to Inspect court
file--
Permitted
ht
tp://www.scri
bd
.com/doc/215296312/
5. Relationship
of
the Requester
to the
court
file:
No
relationship except for academic interest.
Data: March
8,
2014
Requester's Signature
2003-:\ 
0ll.m
,(o'p'n::J
P
Y)
i111::J
Y
7J
'
1i1 'n::J1
~~
IV
~il
'n::J
m1pn
(().)4
mpn)
,2
o::,m
:wp~~n ~,D
.1
j7 Jl~
t']OI'
l l
:
l'\7;-)
OlV
05362559-6
:
m;n
'0;-)
:l':lN-'m
,
33407
1n
:
n:n
m
I'N:
T ::J7~
'Oi)
:
Dw~n
n'::l
p'n
~
D
.2
2300/11
y n
:
P Yi1
lVj71:J, J
1:llV
~:;v
 
J
n :l
p n
o;o::
nJIUl '7ilmJ
D'lJ91U)')il
liU
J 0'901J D'lnJY 76+•TDIUN
'lJ))')
:
j?'n:J
t:; ii:Si1
il :l.:lill
il9')Nil
2
/3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->