Introduction and Principles of Linkage Analysis
The male in the second row is quite easy. Can you explain why he must be a heterozygote?
The male in the first row is more difficult, and the answer depends on our prior assumption about gene frequency. This is taken as
=.4 in Table 1.
The male in the third row is even more difficult, but the answer in this case does not depend on gene frequency. Can you explain briefly why this is the case?
Table 1. Genotype probabilities for the males in Figure 1.
Male in row p(aa) p(Aa) a(AA) 1 0.6 0.4 0 2 0 1 0 3 2/3 1/3 0 We might be able to deduce some results for simple cases like this, by relatively simple logic. But what about bigger examples in more realistic, complex pedigrees? If we have 20 ungenotyped animals we have up to 3 to the power 20 (=3,486,784,401) 'possible' answers for the 2-allele, 3-genotype case. This makes solution by simple searching methods not feasible. Most methods for doing this sort of thing make use of information from three sources: 1. Parents 2. Self 3. Mate(s) plus progeny,