You are on page 1of 17
 
Lujan, Melssa R., Esq. Michael Brooks-Jimenez PC 5708 S Western Avenue Oklahoma Cty, OK 73109

epartment
of
Justice
Executive Oce r Immigration Revew
Bard  Immgratn ppeals Oce he Cerk
 5107 leesburg Pik ute 2000  hc Vrgn 050
HS /ICE Oce of Cef Counsel -OKC 4400 SW 44th Street, Suite A Oklahoma Cty, OK 731192800 Name: HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, ELE ...  A 07 4-571-777 Date of ths notice: 3 /31 /2014
Ecosed s a copy of he Boad's decson ad od n e aboe-eferenced case. closue
P b G Jh G w R H 
Sceely,
D
c
Dona Ca Ce Clerk
yugc  k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Elena Hernandez-Hernandez, A074 571 777 (BIA Mar. 31, 2014)
 
U..
Departmen
of
Jusce
Execuve Oce r I gron Review Decso of e Bod of mgaton Appeals Fas Chc Vgina
20530
File  A074 571 777 Dlas, TX  re: ENA HENNDEZENNDEZ  EMOVAL PROCEEGS  APEL  Dae ON BEHAF OF RSOENT: elisa  uj, squire N BEHALF F DHS ichelle AencCoy  Assistt Chif Counse PPCATION: Adsn f satus
MAR 31
2014
The espondent, a ave  citizen of Mexico, has led  appeal om the  aio Juges decsio datd February 23, 212, denng her pictio  dusme of tas ner section 245(i) o the mmiaion d Ntioality Act,
8
S § 1255(i),  he exercise of discon We wil em the case to the Immiaion Jdge  h poceedigs The spondet ues o ppeal tat te Imiatin Judges discreton denial of her appaio to adst stau wa eoous a  bse o discretio d sh be vesed. Specicaly, e espondent argues hat the Imiation Judge eed in (1) denyng he plicio psut to
Matter of Almanz,
24 &N Dec. 771 A 2009), o e basi of her  puote ilure o comply wih he Cou' isctions,  i (2) o weig he posive eqies prsent in her case ags er negative ctors, as s h i
Mater of rai,
13 I&N ec 4 BA 170)
See
espondent Appe Bief a 4-7The repondet as h he c in h ca die m ose in
Mater of lmanza, supra,
i tha,  ta case, the alien did not submit te documeaion tt was specically requested o
h
d gave no reson  ing to do so  He, the respode gue at he di e subsania tep o comy w the pecic insctions the mition Jdge gve her on Novmber 19, 20, cldig hirng a  pper on Dcembe 21, 2010, to prepe her income tx re, oing a tax
 number, payng poio of  bil h receive om e Inteal Reveue Serice
()
in Febary 2010, d binng o cou documents evidencin he atios s took o comply wih t mition Jdg's itcions The repondn  manns   mition udge s to cep e ocens se ru o c on  Apil 21, 201 {T. at 53),  onsie  esons r no having lly comid with e insucions he gave e was not eonabl T eponden he gue hat th miaion Judge di ot weig her key negativ cto of no havng le es in the Unte States an h my positive eqties, wc ince her 20-pls ys ng n the Ute Sae wih  similly lng histoy f stale empln, r aving w United States ciizen chien, d  e lk o a i  cordng o e esponde, d e o uge weie ll te poiive d neaive ctos in er cse, he wod ave und tha e posive cto  pvaile i her vor

Cite as: Elena Hernandez-Hernandez, A074 571 777 (BIA Mar. 31, 2014)
 
)
 A074 51 7 We aee with the  ation Judge at he respondent di not show  compice wit his isctions espite the ve-mont continuce he ted her on November 9, 2010. Specicaly the responent d not brig to cor on pril 21, 2011, evidence at she had eer  pa al her einquent tes or estabished a pament p wth the S d complete e rst o paments Nor did she ring evidence at she ed her 2005 ncome t re (J. at 83; Tr at 444 5053). However, we aee w e respodent at the cts n her case der omewht om ose n
Maer of lmana supra
so at t woud have een reasonble r e Iaton Judge to at least accept the evidece she brout to co on Apri 2, 201, d  proceed wth e adjucaton of her applcaton r adjsent of status We ao aee wth e  respondent at the mmiaio Judge' decsion shoud have incude yss o e  postve d negatve euities in the respondents cse
Maer of ra
3 I&N Dec 494 (BA 90) As uch, we wi remd te case r the maton Judge to gve both pes oer opporunty o umt aional evidence pernent o the ssue of the repondent' egt r djusen of status as a aer of dscreton  ereer sue a new decson at incudes  ayss of e potive d negve euties in e repondens cse owever we express no opon regding he tmate outcome o these removal proceedig t the present me
ee Maer of L0G-
21 I&N ec 43 (B 1996) ccordngy e lowng orer ha be etered. ORDER: Te case is remed to the  wt the regoing opinion. igraon Judge r her proceedings consstent 2
Cite as: Elena Hernandez-Hernandez, A074 571 777 (BIA Mar. 31, 2014)

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505