/  24
 
Controversies amongemale supporters oIslamic moral renewal, andbetween them and otherMuslims, pinpoint tensionsthat arise between Muslimwomen’s emphasis on theprimacy o deeds over talk-ing about it, and the actualnarrativization o theiridentity as proper Muslims.
 
(Re)Turning t Prper Muslim Practice:Islamic Mral Renewal an Wmen’sCnficting Assertins  SunniIentity in Urban Mali
Drte E. Sz
This article explores competing discourses and understand- ings o proper Muslim practice as they are refected in contro-versies among emale supporters o Islamic moral renewal,and between them and Muslims who do not consider them-selves part o the movement. Supporters o Islamic moral
 renewal highlight the primacy of deeds, such as proper behav-
 ior and correct ritual perormance, as ways to validate their newly adopted religious identity. Their emphasis on properaction, and their dismissal o talking about religiosity, stand in tension with their own tendency to construct elaborate narratives about their decision to embrace what they con-sider a more authentic orm o Islam. The importance they attribute to the embodied perormance o virtue leaves many supporters o Islamic renewal in a double bind: despite theirclaim to unity, their conception o the relationship between individual ethics and the common good, combined with thetendency among supporters o Islamic moral renewal to setthemselves apart rom “other Muslims,” reinorces trends o dierentiation among Muslims who aspire to a new moralcommunity.
Intructin
In August o 1999, during my research on religious education institutions or
adult Muslims in urban Mali, I visited a Muslim women’s learning group inan older neighborhood o San, a town in southeastern Mali.
1
Ater the usualintroductions and I had explained my interest in women’s learning activi-ties, the group’s leader (
tontigi
) oered to respond “to any kind o questionI might have” on Muslim women’s attendance to the “learning group.”
 
 (    )    u i    g  o oM u  S i   M  c i    c 
 af     r  i      c a
 o d 5  (    )   
Prompted by my questions about the experiences that had motivated women
to join the group, the women discussed events and experiences, some othem painul and worrisome, such as the passing o a close amily memberand other events that put the amily under heavy nancial strain. Finally,Mamou, who had introduced me to the group, turned to me and observed
matter-o-actly: “You know, ultimately, all these dierences [in experience]among us do not matter. What matters is that we all ound the answer to our
worries in God, in our search or greater closeness to him. Regardless o theexperiences we made, and o the sorrow they may have brought us, we allrealized one day that only God’s will counts, that we will be redeemed orour mundane actions, that we will reach paradise only when we return tothe true ways in which God should be worshipped through all activities in
which we engage.” And to the murmuring sound o other women’s approval,
she added, “This is why we need to invite others to join us, to return to trueIslam; those others who may claim to be Muslim yet whose actions revealtheir denial o God’s truth.”Mamou’s account captures in a nutshell the concerns articulated byurban Malian people, who, to eect a moral renewal o society and sel, arenewal based on what they understand to be the authentic, unmitigatedteachings o Islam, as “true supporters o Islam” (
silame kanubagaw 
) are
central agents in a process that has led to an unprecedented presence o Islam
in Mali’s urban and semiurban public arenas. Although their activities haveroots in processes that started in the 1940s and have accelerated since thelate 1970s, it was the introduction o multiparty democracy and the atten-dant granting o civil liberties in 1991 that enabled the current orms andinrastructure o Muslim proselytizing (
da‘wa
). In the streets o the capital,Bamako, and in other Malian towns, mosques, and schools (
medersa
), hugebillboards and graito-style Arabic inscriptions have multiplied. Muslimso dierent orientations, ailiations, and pedigrees play vocierous roles inpublic controversies that address questions o the cultural and ethical oun-dations on which the political community should be based (Schulz 2003).Their activities are most successul in urban areas in which lineages associ-
ated with Su orders and other traditional religious authorities ormerly had
little political infuence.
Women play a prominent role in the Islamic renewal movement. They
reer to themselves simply as Muslim women (
silame musow 
) and thereby
set themselves apart rom other women (
muso tow 
), who, in their eyes, stray
rom the path set by the
sunna
, the prophet’s example. Like many male sup-porters o Islamic renewal, Muslim women thereby posit, i only implicitly,their distance rom practices reerred to, in local parlance, as “traditional”Islam (Brenner1993a:76–77).
2
Still, they generally avoid making reerencesto the
sunna
a point o direct, public conrontation. They do so becausethey know well that, by denying other women the status o Sunni Muslims,they risk perpetuating earlier struggles among Malian Muslims over ritualorthopraxy. Formerly, these struggles—at least those documented in thescholarly literature—were ought primarily by men, sometimes by violent

Share & Embed

More from this user

Add a Comment

Characters: ...