Tippu Sultan's Search for Legitimacy: Islam and Kingship in a Hindu Domain, Vol 5. Pp. 184
. Oxford University Press.
pp1-3; Phillip B. Wagoner “Tipu Sultan's Search for Legitimacy: Islamand Kingship in a Hindu Domain by Kate Brittlebank (Review)”
The Journal of Asian Studies
Vol. 58, No. 2 (May, 1999) pp. 541–543
Valath, V. V. K. (1981) (in Malayalam).
Keralathile Sthacharithrangal - Thrissur Jilla
.Kerala Sahithya Academy. pp. 74–79.
Tipu Sultan’s Search for Legitimacy: Islam and Kingship in a Hindu domain
(Delhi: Oxford University Press) 1997
Hyder Ali and Tippu Sultan and the struggle with the Musalman powers of the south
(Oxford: Clarendon Press) 1893
The Real Tippu
. Rishi Publications, Varanasi.
Bhagwan S. Gidwani,
The Sword of Tippu Sultan
Select Letters of Tippoo Sultan
, London 1811
Report on the Interior Administration, Resources and Expenditure of the Government of Mysore under the System prescribed by the Order of the Governor-General in Council dated 4September 1799
, Bangalore 1864, and
Historical Sketches of the South of India in an Attempt toTrace the History of Mysore
, 2 vols, ed. M. Hammick, Mysore 1930.
C.C. Davies "Review of
The History of Tipu Sultan
by Mohibbul Hasan" in
The English Historical Review
Vol.68 №.266 (Jan, 1953) pp144-5
A. Subbaraya Chetty “Tipu’s endowments to Hindus and Hindu institutions” in Habib (Ed.)
Irfan Habib "War and Peace. Tipu Sultan's Account of the last Phase of the Second War withthe English, 1783-4"
State and Diplomacy Under Tipu Sultan
(Delhi) 2001 p5; Mohibbul Hasanwrites "The reasons why Tippu was reviled are not far to seek. Englishmen were prejudicedagainst him because they regarded him as their most formidable rival and an inveterate enemy,and because, unlike other Indian rulers, he refused to become a tributary of the English Company.Many of the atrocities of which he has been accused were allegedly fabricated either by personsembittered and angry on account of the defeats which they had sustained at his hands, or by the prisoners of war who had suffered punishments which they thought they did not deserve. He wasalso misrepresented by those who were anxious to justify the wars of aggression which theCompany's Government had waged against him. Moreover, his achievements were belittled and