Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LULAC - Snippet 1 - Transfer of Alternate Delegates

LULAC - Snippet 1 - Transfer of Alternate Delegates

Ratings: (0)|Views: 84|Likes:
Published by Editor

More info:

Published by: Editor on Apr 11, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 Snippet 1
 Transfer of Alternate Delegates The Editor will be presenting short snippets from 580 pages of evidentiary hearings involving witnesses to the Soto, et al v. LULAC, et al case being played out in Tucson, Arizona. The Editor will eventually provide the Voice subscribers the full 580 page document. The document will be presented in pdf as a full court text and a converted document to Word that will be linkable to your computer for you to search the full 580 pages. Everything that is dirty in LULAC can be found in this document. The first snippet is from pages 7 and 8 as the attorney for Plaintiffs Soto, et al, lays out to the court a brief run of what the evidentiary evidence will be about. In this snippet, the attorney Chris Ford talks briefly about transfer of alternate delegates. Eventually you will be able to read the actual testimony that better describes the illegal, and very likely criminal, process. The numbering that appears before each line is because the copy is taken directly from the court transcript with the numbering left in. This case should be required reading in Latino studies classes from pre-kinder through the Ph. D. level. Part of Statement by Attorney Ford; 11 They engaged in favoritism. They gave out 12 money and financial support to, again, perceived allies 13 politically. They -- when regard -- when the voters -- 14 the members in the national convention were prevented from 15 registering and being credentialed -- as the court may 16 recall, it's sort of a two-step process -- they cut off 17 avenues of appeal, and they used so-called legal opinions 18 to justify excluding voters. 19 And finally, they engaged in some processes

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->