• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Copyright and publication details 
© Statewatch ISSN 1756-851X. Personal usage as privateindividuals/”fair dealing” is allowed. Usage by those work-ing for organisations is allowed only if the organisation holdsan appropriate licence from the relevant reprographic rightsorganisation (eg: Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK) withsuch usage being subject to the terms and conditions of that licence and to local copyright law.
Acknowledgments
Tis report was produced by Ben Hayes or Statewatch andthe ransnational Institute. Additional research was con-ducted by Max Rowlands and Fiona O’Malley o Statewatch,while ony Bunyan and revor Hemmings (also Statewatch)provided a constant stream o invaluable comments, inor-mation and guidance (several sections also draw heavily onony Bunyan’s columns or the Guardian newspaper’s ‘Liber-ty Central’ website). Te inormation and analysis providedby Frank Slijper (Dutch Campaign Against the Arms radeand NI), Matthias (rom Gipelsoli), and Kamil Mraijcek (ECCHR) was also invaluable, as was Tomas Mathiesen’sadvice in respect to the variations on the ‘Panopticon’ dis-cussed in this report.Te report was edited by Nick Buxton and Fiona Dove o the ransnational Institute (NI) and benefted rom help-ul comments and suggestions rom Wilbert van der Zeijdenand David Sogge at NI and Eric oeper o CILIP, Ger-many. Te author also gained much insight rom discussionsat a number o conerences and seminars. In particular, the
International Workshop on Surveillance and Democracy
 organised by Minas Samatas at the University o Crete inJune 2008, and the seminars on the EU organised at the‘Militarism: Political Economy, Security, Teory’ conerenceat the University o Sussex, organised by Iraklis Oikonomouand Anna Stavrianakis in May 2009. Te comments o KevinHaggerty (Department o Sociology, University o Alberta)on an earlier dra paper on the European Security ResearchProgramme (ESRP), prepared or the ‘Surveillance andDemocracy’ conerence, were also very helpul in terms o shaping this report.
 
NeoConOpticon
The EU Security-Industrial Complex
NeoConOpticon
 Introduction
Summary of the report Neo-what? Te ideas behind the title
 Bringing in big business: the European Security Research Agenda
Setting out the stall: the ‘Group of Personalities’ Preparatory actions: EU security research 2004-2006Setting the agenda: the European Security Research Advisory Board Te FP7 programme and beyond: security research 2007-20132030 vision: Te European Security Research and Innovation Forum A lobbyist’s dream
 From security research to security policy
owards a political economy of the ESRPFull spectrum dominance: the mission explained 
 Full spectrum dominance in the borderlands
Points of departure: from migration controls to social controlsEUROSUR: the European Border Surveillance SystemR&D for global apartheid?
Combating crime and terrorism: full spectrum surveillance
Te EU’s PARIO Acts‘Situation awareness’ Te dawning of the biometric age
 
Suspect communities: profiling and targeting systemsTe EU’s space race: Galileo and KopernikusEyes in the skies: unmanned aerial vehicles
 A world of red zones and green zones
Critical infrastructure protectionPolicing the red zone: crisis management policyTe policing of protest: a full spectrum dominance case study
 Full Spectrum governance
‘Interoperability’ Expanding the concept of national securityTe years ahead 
Taking stock
Conclusions and recommendations
Contents
Part I 
12
Part II 
345678
Part III 
910
Part IV 
111213
Part V 
141516171819
Part VI 
202122
Part VII 
232425
Part VIII 
26
 
4691215182226282933364143454649525558636770727578
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...