Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Frank Luntz Memo

Frank Luntz Memo

Ratings: (0)|Views: 732|Likes:
Published by TDGoddard

More info:

Published by: TDGoddard on Oct 30, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/10/2010

pdf

text

original

 
 
MEMORANDUM
To: Interested PartiesFrom: Frank LuntzRe: Health Reform Language HighlightsDate: Wednesday, October 28, 2009
OVERVIEW
“Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it.”
I was there in 1994. I saw what happened when a once-popular president tried to pushhealthcare legislation that Americans didn’t want or appreciate. I witnessed the electoralimplications when his administration tried to expand the role of government against the wishesof, well, almost everyone. And it’s happening once again.Let me be clear: this memo isn’t meant to be partisan and it’s not just for Republicans. Itis my hope, in fact, that they will share the contents of this document with their moderateDemocrat counterparts – those who care more answering to the people they represent thananswering to their leaders who are, quite frankly, pushing them off a cliff. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid’s recent insistence on including a massively expensive
“public”
option (in reality, it is a
“government”
option) has been met with a resounding thud bya majority of Americans. For some reason, advocates of government-run insurance are intent onincluding it in health reform even if its inclusion brings down health reform altogether. Whether this insistence on public/gov’t option is driven by ideology or by a misplaced belief in some of the more recent superficial polling on this issue is hard to know – and it’s just plain wrongOne thing is for sure – anyone who would place their political future in the hands of asingle survey question purporting to show that Americans want Washington to jump into thehealthcare business probably deserves to lose.Yet while the public/government option is getting all the attention it is becoming a side-showto the real issues driving this debate for most Americans:-- The fact that the current proposals will cost them more, personally and theyknow it;-- Increase already ballooning deficits and looming national debt; and-- Further insert government into Americans’ lives and harm the quality of their care. (Don’t take my word for it – the NBC/WSJ poll last week says it all: 40% believe their quality of care will worsen, while only 21% think it will improve.)
 
 2
Our research this month shows that:
 
Individuals believe this will add to – not reduce – their personal health care costs. We’renot alone. That NBC/WSJ poll is only the most recent to uncover this painful perception.The margin is HUGE:
47%
think 
their costs
will go
up
thanks to “Barack Obama’shealthcare plan,” while
only 13%
think 
their costs
will go
down.
This is NOT a goodsign for legislation that’s been sold as beneficial for the economy and promised to reducehealth spending. Various public and private cost reports have clearly seeped into thenational consciousness, despite Democrats' frantic efforts to discredit them. The longer the debate goes, the more likely people are to see healthcare costs rising, not falling.
 
Claims of deficit-neutrality are roundly rejected and even ridiculed. No one believes thatthe government will enact a massive new entitlement without costing Americans moremoney.
In fact – and quote this – by an incredible 61% to 14% margin, more peoplebelieve scientists will discover life in outer space than believe the current healthcareplan won’t add a penny to the deficit.
The President has clearly diminished hiscredibility by claiming this won’t add
“one dime”
to the deficit.
 
The intensity is with the opponents of the current legislation. Fully 25% of thosesurveyed said they would
“actively work to defeat”
members of Congress who vote for agovernment insurance plan, while only 8% said they would work to support them.
 
Overall
opposition
to the Congressional healthcare plan generally – and specifically toany kind of government-run insurance -- is, predictably, more intense in the states of centrist Democrats.
 
Seniors are soundly against the current plans. They aren’t buying that $400 billion incuts aren’t really cuts and they really don’t like the idea that Congress appears to be paying for health reform on their backs.
 
This legislation may have been more tolerable to Americans months ago, before thevarious stimulus, bailouts, etc. – but now it is much too much. Americans are deeplyconcerned that Congressional Democrats are over-reaching and heaping too much on thetable at the risk of bankrupting the country. The sense of fragility about the current
“jobless recovery”
is palpable – and you see it in the just-released consumer confidencenumbers – but some people aren’t listening.The bottom-line is that pushing through major economy-altering legislation in theabsence of any bi-partisan support is a recipe for disaster – either now or later. The fact that for most Americans the result of the legislation is expected to be higher taxes, higher premiums,and/or reduced services is not likely to engender great good-will after the fact.
 
 3
SETTING THE CONTEXT
1.
You STILL need to acknowledge the need for reform.
We’ve seen a small erosionin the public sentiment that there is a healthcare crisis. This is likely due to thehealthcare debate itself: the threat of a government takeover of healthcare has madesome Americans more appreciative of the healthcare they have right now.Even so, a clear majority of Americans believe healthcare in America still at least is
“seriously troubled and needs significant revisions.”
2.
While Americans still perceive a genuine healthcare problem, they do not viewthe Democrats’ approach as the right solution.
Our language survey is consistentwith most national polls: half of all Americans (49%) now oppose the plan, whileonly 39% support it (and 12% remain undecided). This is almost a perfect reversal of where support for the President’s reform plan stood in the spring. Clearly, thelanguage of the opposition is resonating. But to identify the words, themes, andemotions that resonate most on the issue, our poll goes further.--
First, notice that
more than third 
of Americans
 strongly
oppose thelegislation (34%).
They are primarily, but not exclusively,conservative voters.--
Importantly, 48% of self-identified independents oppose thelegislation
(30% strongly), compared to only 40% who support it.The untold story of the past six months is the collapse in supportamong independents and moderates. Republicans always hated theObama approach, while Democrats were always in his corner. But tosee Americans in the political center turn from cautiously supportive toincreasingly opposed is the most significant political consequence of the debate.--
Seniors, obviously a key constituency, are in firm opposition to thereform plan (57% oppose, 36% support).
Back in April, they wereevenly divided.
More precisely, it is men aged 60+ who are theangriest.
 
Fully 47% of men 55 or older are
 strongly
oppose theplan (61% are at least somewhat opposed).
 
Suggestion: So far, most of the ads featuring concerned patients have beenwomen. It’s time to include men in these ads, too. Treatment of prostatecancer can be delayed just as much as for breast cancer when the government takes over care – and American men deserve to know about that.

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Jay Campbell liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->