Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Strunk Affidavit in Opposition to US MTD DCD 09-Cv-1295 w Exhibits 102309

Strunk Affidavit in Opposition to US MTD DCD 09-Cv-1295 w Exhibits 102309

Ratings: (0)|Views: 68|Likes:
Published by Chris Strunk

More info:

Published by: Chris Strunk on Oct 31, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/30/2009

pdf

text

original

 
Strunk v. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Census et al. DCD 09-cv-1295
1
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------x
:Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse and the CHRISTOPHER :(aka “CHRIS”) STRUNK jus tertii People, :
593 Vanderbilt Avenue 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 :845-901-6767
Plaintiffs
:
Civil No.: 09-cv-1295: Hon. Richard J. Leonv.
:
:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE :BUREAU OF THE CENSUS (BOC) et al. ::Defendants. :
:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------xPLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TODISMISS THE COMPLAINT AS TO FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND DEPARTMENTSECRETARIES IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND INDIVIDUALLYSTATE OF NEW YORK )) ss.:COUNTY OF KINGS )Accordingly
, I,
Christopher –Earl: Strunk
, being duly sworn, depose and say:
1.
 
Affiant / Plaintiff Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, (Affiant, Strunk) hereby responds inopposition to the motion to dismiss the complaint as a matter of law by Defendants United StatesDepartment of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Gary Locke, Secretary of the United StatesDepartment of Commerce, United States Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano,Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, the United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and BarrySoetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama (the Usurper),
 
(Federal Defendant(s), Defendant(s))represented by CHANNING D. PHILLIPS acting United States Attorney for Washington D. C.and Assistant U.S. Attorneys RUDOLPH CONTRERAS and WYNNE P. KELLY.
 
Strunk v. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Census et al. DCD 09-cv-1295
22.
 
That outrageously CHANNING D. PHILLIPS acting United States Attorney by hisagents alleges Affirmant has somehow filed a vexatious and frivolous case as if “
a grand conspiracy in which the Society of Jesus, a religious order of the Roman Catholic Church,controls the nation
”; and to wit Affirmant strenuously denies the wrongful deviouscharacterization meant to deconstruct the underlying facts to Plaintiff's injury and associatedhistory that supports the need for a declaratory judgment and writ of Federal Defendants to act intheir fiduciary capacity and or absent such thereby must facilitate Plaintiff with 18 USC §1964(c)to recover damages incurred after the Quo Warranto Inquest is done by this Court.3.
 
That upon hearing the facts on the injury to Plaintiff(s) in esse (living being) here in NewYork, along with those similarly situated, and as recognized by the New York State Legislatureas Plaintiff jus tertii represents any standing as an aggrieved State Citizens
(1)
, and also as aUnited States Citizen(s) resident in Washington District of Columbia as a (fictional) corporateentity(ies) that as Government contractor(s) by way of each entity registration and bonding withPlaintiff’s actual birth certificate whose bond is on file at the Department of Commerce and usedas an article trade by Defendants against Plaintiff’s in esse rights protected by New York law.4.
 
That Affirmant in esse makes a special appearance herein without waiver of anysovereignty as the Trustee and a benefactor of his corporate bond as CHRISTOPHER EARLSTRUNK questionably held in Washington District of Columbia otherwise against his wishes asan article of trade in commerce under the Uniform Commercial Code, against New York Lawand having damaged Plaintiff in esse in excess of One Million Dollars.
1
 
Citizens
:
"T
he citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certainduties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able tosubsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally followthe condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.
"
-
US Supreme Court Chief JusticeJohn Marshall in The Venus (1812) case
.
 
 
Strunk v. US Department of Commerce Bureau of Census et al. DCD 09-cv-1295
35.
 
That Affirmant has a related case Strunk v. NEW YORK PROVINCE OF THESOCIETY OF JESUS et al. DCD 09-cv-1249 (RJL) in regards to Federal Defendants’ breech of fiduciary duty to enforce the Logan Act as to the New York Province along with those similarlysituated the twelve provinces and its members who have taken a vow and extreme oath to aforeign sovereign the Black Pope who is the confessor priest to the Prince of the Vatican PopeBenedict XVI; and that Affiant filed an affidavit response in opposition to the FederalDefendants Motion to Dismiss the Complaint as to them with annexed Exhibit A through Owhich coincide with a common argument and request for relief (e.g. the pending inquest for theUsurper with a Quo warranto verified petition before this Court) and for economy and to furtheravoid burden upon the readers Affiant uses the Exhibits chronological order for reference herein.6.
 
As a matter germane herein Plaintiff(s) has an Original Proceeding filed on September11, 2009 in the District of Columbia Circuit for a writ of mandamus under FRAP Rule 21 for anOrder of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to Recuse the district Judgein 08-cv-2234, 09-cv-1249, and 09-cv-1295 with investigation of District Clerk’s Office with 28U.S.C. §455 and related law in its entirety a copy of the Docketing Statement; and as therespective Certificate(s) of Service shows for each matter that the entire package was servedalong with Plaintiffs other responses in the Cases 09-cv-1249 and 09-cv-1295 to Defendants’Counsel on September 10, 2009, and arguments used in Affiant’s response to the DefendantMaryland Province filed with this Court.7.
 
Further by reference Affiant asserts as a matter germane herein as regards the FiduciaryDuty of Federal Defendants that all Jesuits (Provincial Defendants) live under their
constitution
 and have taken vows similar to marriage vows as part of the multi-level oath of their secretextreme vows having been exposed in the Congressional record, shown at referenced Exhibit B,that for good reason is secret being against public policy as a blood oath binding each Declarant

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->