• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 i
09-5322-OP
________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIACIRCUIT
________________________________________________________________________
In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in essePetitioner for a Writ of Mandamus
________________________________________________________________________
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
________________________________________________________________________
Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse, Petitioner in the Original Proceeding for awrit of mandamus under FRAP Rule 21 seeks an Order of the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of Columbia to Recuse the district Judge in 08-cv-2234, 09-cv-1249, 09-cv-1295 with investigation of the impropriety of theDistrict Clerk’s Office with 28 U.S.C. §455 and related law in its entirety; anda stay of proceedings below until this matter is resolved herein.
__________________________________________________________________________
593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281Brooklyn, New York 11238Cell-845-901-6767
Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse
 
 ii 
RESPONDENTS
The Honorable Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberthfor the U.S. District for the District of Columbia333 Constitution Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001The Honorable Richard J. LeonUnited States District Judge for theU.S. District for the District of Columbia333 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 6315,Washington, DC 20001
RESPONDENTSJohn Marcus McNichols
 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, LLP725 12th Street, NWWashington, DC 20005(202) 434-5029; jmcnichols@wc.com
 Attorney for Defendants Maryland Provinceof the Society of Jesus and Fr. Timothy B. Brown, S.J.
John Michael Bredehoft
, Esq.KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.150 West Main Street – P.O. Box 3037Norfolk, VA 23514(757) 624-3225, (757) 624-3169 (fax)Counsels for Defendants:The New York Province of the Society of Jesus and Father Gerald Chojnacki, S.J.Brigham John Bowen, A.U.S.A. for theU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE20 Massachusetts Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530(202) 514-6289 Fax: (202) 616-8460Representing:U.S. DEPARTMENT OFSTATE (DOS), And U.S. DEPARTMENTOF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS). Jennifer M. OlkiewiczAssistant General CounselOffice of the General CounselU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEFederal Bureau of Investigation935 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room PA-400Washington, DC 20535phone: (202) 220-9309, Fax: 220-9341.
Maria J. Rivera
 TEXAS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYGENERALP.O. Box 12548Austin, TX 78711(512) 475-4099maria.rivera@oag.state.tx.usfor the State of Texas
 
 1
AFFIDAVIT of Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse, Petitioner in support of the Original Proceeding for a writ of mandamus under FRAP Rule 21 seeksan Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia toRecuse the District Judge in 08-cv-2234, 09-cv-1249, 09-cv-1295, withinvestigation of impropriety of the District Clerk’s Office with 28 U.S.C. §455and related law in its entirety; and a stay of proceedings below until thismatter is resolved herein.
 
STATE OF NEW YORK )) ss.:COUNTY OF KINGS )
Accordingly
, I,
Christopher–Earl : Strunk
© in esse
, being duly sworn, depose and say:1.
 
Affiant place for service is at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238;Cell Phone (845) 901-6767; Email: cestrunck@yahoo.com; SKYPE: cestrunk.2.
 
Affiant, the Petitioner herein, makes this affidavit under FRAP Rule 21 and seeks anoriginal proceeding in this Petition for a Writ of Mandamus for an Order of the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of Columbia to Recuse the District Judge in 08-cv-2234, 09-cv-1249, 09-cv-1295, with investigation of impropriety of the District Clerk’s Office with 28U.S.C. §455 and related law in its entirety; and a stay of proceedings in District below until thismatter is resolved herein.3.
 
Petition Table of Contents
: Page
•
 
The impropriety of the U.S.D.C. of Washington D.C. Clerk’s Office.…………… 2
•
 
The impropriety of the District Judge…………………………………………….. 5
•
 
The Quo Warranto demand in re the treason of Usurper Barry Soetoro et al……... 15
•
 
No salvation outside of the Gnostic Mystery Religion ……………………………. 20
•
 
Pontifex maximus’ Council of Trent versus Rosicrucian Protestant / Templars.…. 27
•
 
The Jesuit Templars before and after the Bull of 1773 banning the Jesuits…........... 33
•
 
Papal Crusader Father Leonard Feeney S.J. versus the Jesuit Templars of Boston… 37
•
 
Benedict XVI’s Fatima versus
John Paul II / Fr. Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin’s Vatican II.. 38
•
 
Argument for relief is for a nation of laws not men ……………………………………40
 
•
 
Affiant Jurat …………………………………………………………………………….43
 
•
 
Exhibit 2-F: The Affidavit of Edward M. Person, Jr. material witness - process server
•
 
Exhibit 13: The Affidavit of Eric-Jon Phelps, expert witness for testimony.
•
 
Annexed are Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2-A to Exhibit 2-M and Exhibit 3 through Exhibit 19.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...