Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Aereo SCOTUS Transcript

Aereo SCOTUS Transcript

Ratings: (0)|Views: 168|Likes:
Published by Sam Gustin
Aereo SCOTUS Transcript
Aereo SCOTUS Transcript

More info:

Categories:Types, Legal forms
Published by: Sam Gustin on Apr 22, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/01/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
1
 
Official - Subject to Final Review
 
1
 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 
2
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
3
 
AMERICAN BROADCASTING :
 
4
 
COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., :
 
5
 Petitioners : No. 13-461
 
6
 v. :
 
7
 
AEREO, INC., FKA BAMBOOM :
 
8
 
LABS, INC. :
 
9
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
10
 Washington, D.C.
 
11
 Tuesday, April 22, 2014
 
12
 
13
 The above-entitled matter came on for oral
 
14
 
argument before the Supreme Court of the United States
 
15
 
at 11:26 a.m.
 
16
 
APPEARANCES:
 
17
 
PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf
 
18
 of Petitioners.
 
19
 
MALCOLM L. STEWART, ESQ., Deputy Solicitor General,
 
20
 Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalf of
 
21
 the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting
 
22
 Petitioners.
 
23
 
DAVID C. FREDERICK, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf of
 
24
 Respondent.
 
25
 
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
 
2
 
Official - Subject to Final Review
 
1
 C O N T E N T S
 
2
 
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGE
 
3
 
PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.
 
4
3On behalf of the Petitioners
5
 
ORAL ARGUMENT OF
 
6
 
MALCOLM L. STEWART, ESQ.
 
7
 On behalf of the United States, as
 
8
 amicus curiae, supporting Petitioners 19
 
9
 
ORAL ARGUMENT OF
 
10
 
DAVID C. FREDERICK, ESQ.
 
11
 On behalf of the Respondent 27
 
12
 
REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF
 
13
 
PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.
 
14
 On behalf of the Petitioners 51
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
3
 
Official - Subject to Final Review
 
1
 P R O C E E D I N G S
 
2
 (11:26 a.m.)
 
3
 CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: We'll hear argument
 
4
 
next in Case 13-461, American Broadcasting Companies v.
 
5
 
Aereo.
 
6
 Mr. Clement.
 
7
 ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAUL D. CLEMENT
 
8
 ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS
 
9
 MR. CLEMENT: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it
 
10
 
please the Court:
 
11
 Aereo's business model is to enable
 
12
 
thousands of paying strangers to watch live TV online.
 
13
 
Aereo's legal argument is that it can make all of that
 
14
 
happen without publicly performing. But Congress passed
 
15
 
a statute that squarely forecloses that rather
 
16
 
counterintuitive submission. Because although the
 
17
 
Internet and the thousands of mini antennas are new, the
 
18
 
basic service that Aereo is providing is not materially
 
19
 
different from the service provided by the cable company
 
20
 
before this Court in 1969.
 
21
 JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: Why aren't they cable
 
22
 
companies?
 
23
 MR. CLEMENT: They're not --
24
 JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: I'm looking at the --
25
 
everybody's been arguing this case as if for sure
 
Alderson Reporting Company
 

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->