Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Weight loss for DM-Type 2 patients

Weight loss for DM-Type 2 patients

Ratings: (0)|Views: 75|Likes:
Published by KKVC

More info:

Published by: KKVC on Nov 01, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





High-Protein/Low-Carb Diet Effective for Weight Loss inType 2 Diabetes, But Merits Remain Unsubstantiated
Becky McCall
October 6, 2009 (Vienna, Austria) — Reducing carbohydrate consumption to control high bloodglucose in people with diabetes reduces the risk for macrovascular and microvascular complications,according to Richard Feinman, PhD, from the Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York. In anopen discussion with other experts on diabetes and diet, he added that the science is not controversialbut policy regarding dietary control in diabetes is.Speaking at a symposium at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes 45th Annual Meeting,Prof. Feinman said that official boards were reluctant to fully accept data supporting the role of carbohydrates in diabetes control and that scientists representing research in the field of low-carbohydrate diets and diabetes are underrepresented on policy panels."The recommendations are for relatively high carbohydrates. When you press the ADA [AmericanDiabetes Association] for their recommendations, they say they do not have a specific diet, but in factthey recommend a high-carbohydrate [diet] and give grudging support to a restricted-carbohydratediet.""I'd really like to see an impartial panel of scientists that doesn't necessarily have any commitment tonutrition, [such as] physicists or meteorologists. The goal would be a clearer analysis of the facts,laying out the options, especially for people with diabetes. Let the patient and the physician make thedecision," he asserted.Also speaking at the meeting, Arne Astrup, MD, head of the Department of Nutrition at the Universityof Copenhagen in Denmark, explained that ADA recommendations are an ongoing process andshould not change every time a new study is published. "If you stick to evidence-based principles, youwouldn't jump into new extreme diets. I think the ADA is correct in being conservative. It's completelyunsubstantiated that a very-low-carbohydrate diet is safe and effective in the long term. We need 2- to4-year studies to show that this is more effective than other existing trials, such as the DiabetesPrevention Program trial and the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study."Dr. Astrup presented findings from the 8-country Diet, Obesity and Genes (Diogenes 8) Europeandietary intervention study, which showed that, of the 548 people in the trial, those given the high-protein diet after weight loss maintained their weight loss most successfully. The study compared ahigh-protein diet with a low-glycemic-index diet, for which weight maintenance was less marked. "Wekept fat content constant but increased protein slightly. We reduced carbohydrates slightly, from thenormal 55% of calories to 45%, but . . . 20% is much lower. Also, we found that if the carbohydratesare consumed as high fiber and whole grains (low glycemic index), they add some benefit to theincreased protein content."He added that the Diogenes 8 study would be most useful for weight maintenance after weight loss,and probably also weight-gain prevention. "We didn't test diabetics but it is also likely that this dietwould be as effective for type 2 diabetics as other diets. In contrast to the very restrictive low-carbohydrate diet, this is actually a very safe diet, not a crash diet, because it provides all the nutrientswith little risk at the end of the day."
In contrast, Prof. Feinman suggested that a carbohydrate intake of around 20% is most effective indiabetes. However, there is a prevailing concern that low-carbohydrate diets cause people to eat morefat, which has implications for cardiovascular disease (CVD).Prof. Feinman made the case that this is not an issue. "Keeping carbohydrates low would actuallyreduce the risk of CVD. In essence, fat in the presence of carbohydrate is where we find the problems,which is very different from fat in the absence of carbohydrate."He explained that carbohydrates, either directly or through insulin, are control elements in themetabolism. "They determine the disposition of fat — whether stored for obesity or whether having aneffect on lipoproteins and vasculature. The metabolic effect of reducing carbohydrates is that itpredisposes to oxidizing the fat rather than storing it, and in diabetes specifically, it prevents themetabolic state of high glucose and high insulin, which is detrimental across the board."In presenting data initially reported by colleagues, including Mary Gannon, PhD, from the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, Prof. Feinman discussed the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet (20% of calories) on blood glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes. The results were compared withthose obtained in the same people after 5 weeks on a control high-carbohydrate (55%) diet. The low-carbohydrate group showed a significant decrease in fasting glucose, to near normal, and a decreasein hemoglobin A1c. Significantly, the diets were designed so that patients did not gain or lose weight,indicating the benefit even in the absence of weight loss.Discussing the pros and cons of different diets for diabetics, Dr. Astrup said that it depends on whether the patient is insulin-sensitive or insulin-resistant. "If someone is more insulin-resistant, they maybenefit more from a low-carbohydrate diet, but for insulin-sensitive patients, it is probably better tofollow the low-fat/high-carbohydrate diet that is more suitable for them."Agreeing with Prof. Feinman, Iris Shai, MD, from Ben-Gurion University in Beer-Sheva, Israel, addedthat several recent intervention studies, including the 2-year Dietary Randomized Control Trial(DIRECT), suggest that Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets are more beneficial than a low-fatdiet in improving long-term glycemic control, triglycerides, high-density-lipoprotein
cholesterol, the totalcholesterol/low-density-lipoprotein
cholesterol ratio, and weight."Within the first year, most type 2 diabetic patients have their biggest chance to be adequatelycontrolled by diet and physical activity alone and to delay the need for antihyperglycemic drugtherapy." As long as we succeed in tailoring an individual diet strategy to the patient (i.e., low fat/medto low carbohydrate), according to his or her preferences, goals, and diet history, the patient will moresuccessfully adhere to his or her way of life. This means that one diet doesn't fit all, she said.The ADA made a breakthrough when releasing a careful statement in 2008 about the effectivenessand safety of low-carb diets out to 1 year, Dr. Shai said. "I believe that the growing evidence-basedmedicine will eventually change the current perception of the recommended low-fat/high-carb diet.[When] patients can stick to this diet, [it] could help some proportion of the diabetics, as it is a calorie-restricted diet," she concluded.
Dr. Astrup's study was financed by the European Commission and foods for the trial were provided by a wide range of companies. Prof. Feinman, Dr. Astrup, and Dr. Shai have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->