request this Court to take Judicial Notice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 201, These arethe same behaviors Orly Taitz, Appellee herein has instituted against the Appellants’. JudgeClay D. Land’s Order is attached hereto as
and Orly Taitz interview withTalking Points Memo (TPM) and the Huffington Post Articles are attached hereto as
. Judge Clay D. Land’s Order of October 13, 2009 and Appellee Orly Taitz’s refusal tocomply with Judge Land’s Order is imperative to the Appellants’ case herein as it shows theextents Ms. Taitz will go to in order to get her way, with no regard to any individuals; to theLaws of our Nation; and absolutely no respect for our Judiciary. Not only have the Appellants’ herein been severely damaged by Appellee Taitz’scontinued illegal actions, which have now extended to our United States District Court’s FederalJudges, but Appellee Orly Taitz has also failed to comply with the United States District Court,Eastern District of Pennsylvania Court’s Orders and warnings, as she is now doing to JudgeLand. These documents show Appellee Taitz’s continued disrespect for any individual; our Laws; and Judiciary.“A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurateand ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.”Fed. R. Evid. §201(b);
Easy Sportswear, Inc. v. Am. Econ. Ins. Co
., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS51402 (D. Pa. 2008);
Nationwide Life Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Com
., 2005 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 24479 (E.D. Pa. 2005);
In re NAHC, Inc. Sec Litig
, 306 F.3d 1315 (3d Cir. 2002)“[a] court shall take judicial notice if requested by a party and supplied with the necessaryinformation.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(d),
Easy Sportswear, Inc.
, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 514002 (D. Pa2008) at *2.
Case: 09-3403 Document: 00319882496 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2009