Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Gulf Rd. Trails - Parks' Denial Email - 07-11-08 - Pg 1

Gulf Rd. Trails - Parks' Denial Email - 07-11-08 - Pg 1

Ratings: (0)|Views: 36 |Likes:
Published by PRMurphy
Gulf Rd. Trails - Parks' Denial Email - 07-11-08 - Pg 1

Mede discloses during the meeting in the sergeants office 07-10-08 that he had been 'directed' by Parks and Cooley, both of whom were present, according to him, when he was called in to Cooley's office about the Gulf Rd. trails event.

This email is Park's prompt denial that anyone 'ordered' Mede to discipline me over the matter. ie; Parks understands the CBA distinction between a supervisory log entry and a staff initiated 'reprimand,' as well as the need to cover his tracks now that Mede has let the cat out of the bag.

Mede later, in two subsequent phones calls, both of which were witnessed, that he had in fact been 'ordered' to discipline me over the Gulf Rd. trails observation, that he okayed that night, and that Parks and Cooley were both present when the directive was given..

So here we have at least two WCSO supervisory level personnel, one of which is command staff level and now Elfo's #1, caught in an obvious bold faced lie about whether or not anyone had been 'ordered' to discipline me, not to mention Mede's crumpling under pressure and denying that he okay'ed the course of action that night.

Note the 'CC:' line.

Now did anyone get to the bottom of this? Did anyone launch a full scale Class 1 investigation over this? Was anyone 'Brady'ed' about it? I really don't know the answer to any of those questions, but after the discovery conducted in my case there's no record of it.

I'd rather doubt it anyway because neither Parks, Cooley or Mede were the targets. If so, I never heard about it, but in light of other discoveries during my case that really isn't surprising either.

Yet whenever it came to me, oh we absolutely MUST exhaust every resource and expend every effort to make sure to get right to the bottom of whether or not I'M being upfront and honest? I mean, Elfo is right, the ability to testify in court and the ability to be credible before the public is crucial.

Changing gears for a second, does it really surprise anyone that I would eventually come to the conclusion that there must have been a racial-bigoted-prejudicial motivation behind these obvious double standards?

I mean, after weighing everything out out and objectively evaluating what is known now, to the best of my ability anyway, the only real difference I can see between these many instances of double standards, is that one party is Caucasian and the other party is American Indian.

The political aspect and incidences of corruption complicate it somewhat, but doesn't explain it away and I'm still left with the feeling that there was a certain deep seated 'againstness,' for lack of a better word, amongst certain key people at the WCSO, chief of those being Bill Elfo. It was an againstness that I was never going to overcome and was never going to be able to prove myself above, no matter what I did.

As another example, no one there has a better record of stolen vehicle/stolen equipment investigations and recoveries than I do, including a record number of 'rolling stolen' self-initiated activity cases, but you'll never find a record of that there. Not even in any of my annual evals.

Note 1: As this was a response to a previous email I sent the previous day, I only put up Parks' response (page 1) since the rest is the same.
Gulf Rd. Trails - Parks' Denial Email - 07-11-08 - Pg 1

Mede discloses during the meeting in the sergeants office 07-10-08 that he had been 'directed' by Parks and Cooley, both of whom were present, according to him, when he was called in to Cooley's office about the Gulf Rd. trails event.

This email is Park's prompt denial that anyone 'ordered' Mede to discipline me over the matter. ie; Parks understands the CBA distinction between a supervisory log entry and a staff initiated 'reprimand,' as well as the need to cover his tracks now that Mede has let the cat out of the bag.

Mede later, in two subsequent phones calls, both of which were witnessed, that he had in fact been 'ordered' to discipline me over the Gulf Rd. trails observation, that he okayed that night, and that Parks and Cooley were both present when the directive was given..

So here we have at least two WCSO supervisory level personnel, one of which is command staff level and now Elfo's #1, caught in an obvious bold faced lie about whether or not anyone had been 'ordered' to discipline me, not to mention Mede's crumpling under pressure and denying that he okay'ed the course of action that night.

Note the 'CC:' line.

Now did anyone get to the bottom of this? Did anyone launch a full scale Class 1 investigation over this? Was anyone 'Brady'ed' about it? I really don't know the answer to any of those questions, but after the discovery conducted in my case there's no record of it.

I'd rather doubt it anyway because neither Parks, Cooley or Mede were the targets. If so, I never heard about it, but in light of other discoveries during my case that really isn't surprising either.

Yet whenever it came to me, oh we absolutely MUST exhaust every resource and expend every effort to make sure to get right to the bottom of whether or not I'M being upfront and honest? I mean, Elfo is right, the ability to testify in court and the ability to be credible before the public is crucial.

Changing gears for a second, does it really surprise anyone that I would eventually come to the conclusion that there must have been a racial-bigoted-prejudicial motivation behind these obvious double standards?

I mean, after weighing everything out out and objectively evaluating what is known now, to the best of my ability anyway, the only real difference I can see between these many instances of double standards, is that one party is Caucasian and the other party is American Indian.

The political aspect and incidences of corruption complicate it somewhat, but doesn't explain it away and I'm still left with the feeling that there was a certain deep seated 'againstness,' for lack of a better word, amongst certain key people at the WCSO, chief of those being Bill Elfo. It was an againstness that I was never going to overcome and was never going to be able to prove myself above, no matter what I did.

As another example, no one there has a better record of stolen vehicle/stolen equipment investigations and recoveries than I do, including a record number of 'rolling stolen' self-initiated activity cases, but you'll never find a record of that there. Not even in any of my annual evals.

Note 1: As this was a response to a previous email I sent the previous day, I only put up Parks' response (page 1) since the rest is the same.

More info:

Published by: PRMurphy on Apr 26, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/06/2014

pdf

text

original

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->