• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Review: The Public Choice Theory of Murray N. Rothbard, a Modern AnarchistAuthor(s): H. E. Frech IIISource:
Public Choice,
Vol. 14 (Spring, 1973), pp. 143-154Published by: SpringerStable URL:
Accessed: 04/11/2009 01:41
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unlessyou have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and youmay use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer.Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer 
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Public Choice.
http://www.jstor.org
 
THE PUBLICCHOICETHEORY OF MURRAY N.ROTHBARD,AMODERN ANARCHIST*H.E.Frech ///
In recentyears,asmallbutgrowingradical ntellectual movement hasgainedadegreeofprominence.Themembersofthislooselydefinedgroupareverydissatisfied withthepowerofthemodernState.Consistingof conservativeswhohave becomedisillusionedwithconservativepoliticalfiguresand new Leftists whohave becomedisillusioned withgovernmentpower,themovement uses labels likeradicallibertarianism, narchism,andanarchocapitalism.Althoughnotall of thosein thissmallgroupareanarchists,heanarchistsare animportantnfluence.One of thekeyintellectualleadersofthemovementisMurrayN.Rothbard,who isoneof thefewU.S.-trainedanarchisteconomists. For severalyearsheeditedapublicationcalledLeftandRightwhich wasdesignedtopulllibertarianlementsofbothgroupstogether.UntilrecentlyhesharedtheeditorshipoftheLibertarianForum withKarlHess,aNewLeftanarchistwhooncewasaspeechwriterorBarryGoldwater.Rothbardacknowledgesanintellectual debt to the AustrianschoolandtohismentorLudwigVonMises,althoughhisanalysisdiffersinmanywaysfromthatofVon Mises.Rothbard'schallengingand unorthodoxprofessional writings spanawiderangeofpublicchoicetopics includingthestatelesssociety,criticismsofpublicchoicetheorists,thetheoryof theState,democracy,externalitiesandpublicgoods,monopoly,humanandpropertyrights,publicandprivatecoercion,andecono-mists'valuejudgments.Hisanalysesare notalwayscorrectbuttheyareoftenoriginalandinvariablytimulating.ThispaperprovidesacriticalreviewofProfessorRothbard's ittleknownpublicchoicetheories.
TheStatelessSociety
Indiscussingthenecessityofgovernment,Rothbard(1970a,Ch.1)beginswith anexcellentcritiqueof thestandardargumentsforthenecessityofgovernmento settleconflict.First,atypicalstatementwouldhold thatthe state isnecessaryo define andinitiallyallocatepropertyrights.Rothbardsuggeststheallocationofinitialpropertyrightsto thosewhofindandtransformnaturalresourcesbytheir labor.
UniversityofCalifornia,Los Angeles and the National Center for HealthServicesResearchandDevelopment,DHEW. Thanks are due to Paul B. Ginsburg, MichiganStateUniversity,formanyhelpfulcomments on earlier drafts. The views expressed here are notnecessarilythoseof eitheraffiliated institution.
143
 
144PUBLICCHOICEAsingle,ultimate arbiterofconflicts(e.g.,theU.S.SupremeCourt)isconsiderednon-essential.1Citizensof differentcountriesmaintainsuccessfulrelationswithouta final arbiter overthem.Inrelation to eachother,individualsofonecountryand individualsofanothercountryexistinanarchy.Thedangerof afree-market defense andpropertyrightenforcing agencyturningitsphysicalpowerto criminaluses,perhapscolludingwith afree-marketcourtoflawtomakefraudulentdecisions is considered. Heagreesthatsome suchorganizationswillbecome criminal.Rothbardisnotaromanticutopian,believingthat menwillsuddenlybecomefullofgoodnessina statelesssociety.Theanalysisisinteresting preciselybecausehedoesnot believe thatconflicts ofinterestwillevaporatewhentheStateisabolished.Hearguesthatina statelesssociety:...therewouldbe noregular,legalized,channelforcrimeandagression,nogovernmentapparatusthe control of whichprovides...forinvasion ofpersonandproperty...awould-becriminalpoliceorjudiciarywould finditverydifficult to takepower,since therewouldbenoorganizedStateapparatusto seize. ..Tocreatesuchaninstrumentalityde novoisverydifficult. ..historically,it tookStaterulerscenturiestoestablishafunctioningStateapparatus(1970a,p.5).The authorthenarguesthat the checks and balancesresultingfrom the existenceoffreelycompetitivedefenseagenciesandjudiciariesprovidestrongerprotectionthanthoseof theAmericangovernmentalsystem,where,afterall,the institutions areagenciesofthecentralgovernment.Rothbard's modeloffree-marketdefense and conflict settlement is interest-ing.IfSmithbelievesthathe hasbeeninjuredbyJones,he files suitorpresseschargeswithinhisownvoluntarydefenseagency.Smith'sdefenseagencyholds atrial. IfJonesdisputestheverdict,there will be anothertrialeitherinacompetitiveAppealsCourtorinthedefendant's(Jones')defenseagency'scourt.TheAppealsCourt decisionorthatofJones'defenseagency,ifitagreeswithSmith'sagency,may"thenbetakenbythesociety(italicsadded)asbinding."For asRothbardnotes:Everylegal systemneeds some sortof asocial-agreeduponcutoffpoint,apointatwhichjudicial procedure stopsandpunishmentagainsttheconvicted criminalbegins.(1970a,p.5)Further,ina footnoteheasserts that:
1However,asweshallsee, Rothbard'sown modelofavoluntarysocietycontainssucha
final arbiter.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...