Via our venture investing arm, O’Reilly AlphaTech Ventures, O’Reilly is an investor in threeo the companies mentioned in this article: Wesabe, AMEE, and bit.ly
ive years ago, we launched a conerence basedon a simple idea, and that idea grew into amovement. The original Web 2.0 Conerence(now theWeb 2.0 Summit )was designed to restorecondence in an industry that had lost its way aterthe dotcom bust. The Web was ar rom done, weargued. In act, it was on its way to becoming arobust platorm or a culture-changing generationo computer applications and services.In our rst program, we asked why some com-panies survived the dotcom bust, while others hadailed so miserably. We also studied a burgeoninggroup o startups and asked why they were growingso quickly. The answers helped us understand therules o business on this new platorm.Chie among our insights was that “the networkas platorm” means ar more than just oering oldapplications via the network (“sotware as a service”);it means building applications that literally get betterthe more people use them, harnessing network eectsnot only to acquire users, but also to learn rom themand build on their contributions.From Google and Amazon to Wikipedia, eBay,and craigslist, we saw that the value was acilitatedby the sotware, but was co-created by and or thecommunity o connected users. Since then, powerulnew platorms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitterhave demonstrated that same insight in new ways.Web 2.0 is all about harnessing collective intelligence.Collective intelligence applications depend onmanaging, understanding, and responding to mas-sive amounts o user-generated data in real time.The “subsystems” o the emerging internet operatingsystem are increasingly data subsystems: location,identity (o people, products, and places), and theskeins o meaning that tie them together. This leadsto new levers o competitive advantage: Data is the“Intel Inside” o the next generation o computerapplications.Today, we realize that these insights were not onlydirectionally right, but are being applied in areas weonly imagined in 2004. The smartphone revolutionhas moved the Web rom our desks to our pockets.Collective intelligence applications are no longerbeing driven solely by humans typing on keyboardsbut, increasingly, by sensors. Our phones and cam-eras are being turned into eyes and ears or applica-tions; motion and location sensors tell where we are,what we’re looking at, and how ast we’re moving.Data is being collected, presented, and acted uponin real time. The scale o participation has increasedby orders o magnitude.With more users and sensors eeding more appli-cations and platorms, developers are able to tackleserious real-world problems. As a result, the Webopportunity is no longer growing arithmetically; it’sgrowing exponentially. Hence our theme or thisyear: Web Squared. 1990–2004 was the matchbeing struck; 2005–2009 was the use; and 2010will be the explosion.Ever since we rst introduced the term “Web 2.0,”people have been asking, “What’s next?” Assumingthat Web 2.0 was meant to be a kind o sotwareversion number (rather than a statement about thesecond coming o the Web ater the dotcom bust),
Add a Comment