Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Lawyer of a Society as Fiduciary

Lawyer of a Society as Fiduciary

Ratings: (0)|Views: 6 |Likes:
Published by chandrapcnath
Attorneys face a variety of ethical challenges. While doing the “right”thing may not always be easy, it should always be clear. Rules of professional conduct demarcate the line between right and wrong in some instances. Other areas, however, are left to common law (and judicial interpretation) to develop. The question is whether (and, if so, under what circumstances) an attorney (and in our case legal counsel of the Society) maybe held liable for aiding and abetting a clients breach of fiduciary duty and hence criminal Breach of Trust.
Attorneys face a variety of ethical challenges. While doing the “right”thing may not always be easy, it should always be clear. Rules of professional conduct demarcate the line between right and wrong in some instances. Other areas, however, are left to common law (and judicial interpretation) to develop. The question is whether (and, if so, under what circumstances) an attorney (and in our case legal counsel of the Society) maybe held liable for aiding and abetting a clients breach of fiduciary duty and hence criminal Breach of Trust.

More info:

Published by: chandrapcnath on May 03, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/03/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Lawyer of a Society As a Fiduciary
Chandra Nath
May 3, 2014
nath@computer.org He is an Independent researcher engaged in research in informa-tion security, privacy, law & justice.
1
 
LAWYER OF A SOCIETY AS A FIDUCIARY
I Introduction
A
ttorneys face a variety of ethical challenges. While doing the “right”thing may not always be easy, it should always be clear. Rules of professional conduct demarcate the line between right and wrong insome instances. Other areas, however, are left to common law (and judicialinterpretation) to develop. The question is whether (and, if so, under whatcircumstances) an attorney (and in our case legal counsel of the Society) maybe held liable for aiding and abetting a clients breach of fiduciary duty andhence criminal Breach of Trust..
II Aiding and Abetting Standard
The common law of torts imposes liability for aiding and abetting another incommission of a wrongful act. The parameters of aiding and abetting liabilityare laid out in the Restatement (Second) of Torts using a three-prong test:1. the aided party must commit tortious conduct;2. the aider must know that the aided partys conduct constitutes a breachof duty; and3. the aider must give substantial assistance or encouragement to theaided party.Advice or encouragement to act operates as a moral support to a tortfeasorand if the act encouraged is known to be tortious it has the same effect uponthe liability of the adviser as participation or physical assistance. However,assistance can be so slight so as to avoid liability; the factors to consider indetermining liability are:1. the nature of the act encouraged;2. the amount of assistance given by the defendant;3. the presence or absence of the defendant at the time of the tort;4. the defendants relation to the other; and5. the defendants state of mind.3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->