but very little, outside of Canseliet, has been written about what Fulcanelli said. Eugene Canseliet,Fulcanelli’s pupil, took the approach in his works of expanding on Fulcanelli’s alchemicalmetaphors without venturing a concrete explanation of the process itself. By his own admission, henever succeeded in what he imagined the ultimate goal to be, the transmutation of lead into gold.Therefore, we might be justified to suspect Canseliet’s level of understanding.But what did Fulcanelli say? Does he actually reveal the secret of alchemy’s riddle?Understanding Fulcanelli’s masterpiece requires preparation, guidance and more than a little patience. Le Mystere is not literature in the normal sense. It’s an initiation document designed toinstruct the reader in a new way of thinking in and about symbols. Fulcanelli is always honest. Henever cheats the reader or hides behind his vows of secrecy, but he does insist that the reader do thework. Otherwise the revelation is worthless. Therefore, the initiation takes the form of a puzzle, or ariddle.For preparation, one could do no better than to read carefully all of Book III and Chapter Two of Book V of Victor Hugo’s Hunchback of Notre-Dame. Fulcanelli assumes that any intelligent reader would be aware of this perspective and would basically agree with it. Fulcanelli, in Le Mystere, istrying to provide specific examples of Hugo’s metaphors in stone. A good guide book to Notre-Dame is also valuable, as is a general history of the Gothic period and its cathedrals.The best preparation however is to forget everything you have ever read or heard about alchemy.Let Fulcanelli explain it to you as if you had never heard the word before. In practical terms, itmeans skipping Canseliet’s prefaces and Walter Lang’s introduction. Or, at least, save them untillast.When we do this, we start where Fulcanelli started, with an experience, a gnosis, of the transcendent power of a Gothic Cathedral. He tells us that his first sight of a cathedral, at the age of seven, senthim into “an ecstasy, struck with wonder.” Today, the only way to recapture a little of “the magic of such splendor, such immensity, such intoxication expressed by this more divine than human work,”is to stand some quiet summer evening just in front of the railing at the Great Porch of Notre-Damede Paris and slowly let your vision crawl heavenward over the complex universe of symbolic forms.Bathed in the golden light of sunset, thousands of forms and concepts and images struggle towardsome unity of purpose that our modern mind finds all but incomprehensible. But to the child, or thechild-like, it has the power of revelation. book in stone Fulcanelli informs us that the images on the cathedrals speak more clearly than wordsand books. They are “simple in expression, naive and picturesque in interpretation; a sense purgedof subtleties, of allusions ,of literary ambiguities.” The Gothic, he suggests, is like Gregorian
Leave a Comment