Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pro Se
(801) 497-6655
codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.us
_____________________________________________________________________________________
411 West Fourth Street, Room 1053, Santa Anna, California 92701-4516
PAMELA BARNETT )
1
Defendant ) Judge: HONORABLE DAVID O.CARTER
____________________________________________________________________________________
The Plaintiff, appearing Pro Se, humbly submits this Motion for Permissive Joiner and
Amendment To This Civil Action By Additional Candidate In Presidential Election 2008 for
consideration with Motion to Reconsider from Orly Taitz. Finding first Defendant(s) Barrack
Hussein Obama as constitutionally ineligible to run for president, or Officiate as President of the United
States. Finding second, Co-Defendants as party to that knowledge collaborating under the umbrella of
election fraud in knowingly placing an unqualified candidate on the ballot that infringed upon Plaintiff the
Natural Born Citizen requirement (NBC) clause of the Constitution. While it may rest in the Congress to
pass a bill of vetting under process of the 25th Amendment as a forum by which if the President
is found to be incapacitated for some reason he could be removed, and a judgment against him
on the NBC qualification might establish the need for a such a procedure, this case remains
sitting President may be a province of Congress, the election is a province of the people, and
Congress in fact originates as electorate of the people. It follows a complaint might originate
from The People (herein as Plaintiff) for Congress to act upon. Nixon was addressed by a
reporter and then by Congress. As declared Winners of the race, they are found responsibly
owing the Plaintiff, contracted by the presumed alteration or presumed altercation if you will, of
the substantive standard framed under Guideline of the U.S. Constitution: Mandating the
qualification U.S.C Art.II Sect. 1:“No person except a Natural Born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
President…”; that Barack Hussein Obama as a candidate, and now the de facto if not de jure
President since January 21st, 2009, in portrait of winning the election, meets the criteria for the
injurious claim of the Plaintiff that he has suffered from the Defendant posing a legitimate direct
injury calculable to the Plaintiff, which he claims now in Campaign expenses, election race
contestant qualification fairness, constitutional law inalienable to his Rights as a natural born
2
citizen of the United States and candidate of the 2008 Presidential Elections, upholding the
____________________________________
PARTIES
JURISDICTION PROPER
______________________________
1. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 (federal question), 28 U.S.C.
§1343 (civil rights), 18 U.S.C. §1964(c) § 241 § 242, and Civil Rights Act 1861,42 U.S.C.
§§1983,1985 (3) ,1988 (civil rights action Plaintiff seeks declaratory or injunctive relief).
Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §2201-2202 as well as 1988(a) §1332 (2) (1)
U.S. Constitution Venue is proper and Election Statutes pertaining to U.S. Federal Law overseen
in U.S. District Court, FRCP Rule 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (No. 20 addresses permissive
joinder. Permissive joinder allows multiple plaintiffs to join in an action if each of their claims arise from the same
transaction or occurrence, and if there is a common question of law or fact relating to all plaintiffs' claims.
Permissive joinder is also appropriate to join multiple defendants, as long as the same considerations as for joining
multiple plaintiffs are met):( FRCP 15a. There is a discretionary period during which original pleadings may be
amended, that is as a matter of course at the beginning of trial, and later with the discretion of the opposing party or
judge. Rules 18 and 20 delineate who can be joined. However, if not pleaded originally, parties can be brought in
only by way of amendment. Rule 15 describes the process for amending a claim. Under the concept of compulsory
joinder, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 mandates that some parties be joined. Parties that must be joined are
those necessary and indispensable to the litigation.)
2-Plaintiff: Cody Robert Judy- Resident of Utah 1318 North 1500 West, Farr West, Utah 84404
3-Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro - Resident 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington DC
a- This action constitutes a national election of which the State of UTAH is a part, and in
and as such has authority in the Federal Court Division of UTAH, to consider and
interpret the U.S. Constitution, as a Judicial Function of the U.S. Government.
3
NATURE OF CASE
5. The Plaintiff asserts his claim of the damages of which relief should be granted by this
Federal Court. In another Federal Court (Las Vegas, NV.) that assumed Plaintiff’s “standing”
claim against Sen. John McCain as a presidential candidate, but declared the Constitutional
question or natural born citizenship claim “moot” after the general election results. This was
summarily seen as defaulting the winner of the election responsible to assuage the natural born
citizenship clause and claim of damages first rather then a 2nd place finisher as Senator McCain
received 46% of the popular vote which point is moot. For this cause is Barack Hussein Obama
brought as a Defendant now equally under the law along with the other Defendants. The nature
of this case is simply to review the differences of two individual people’s citizenship and
then to comparatively qualify those with the definitive qualifications of the candidates declared
office, in this case the President of the United States, which is found in the U.S. Constitution an
immutable frame under the expert interpretation and redress authority of this court as a Judicial
Branch of the U.S. Government, ( varying in degree to the Legislative Branch which makes laws
and the Executive Branch which enforces law ) and consider the unique political injury by the
defendant candidate not being qualified to Plaintiff who is qualified, as the claim for merit
considering the reward to the unqualified candidate as winning a race he had no business being
in substantiating a concrete invasion of legally protected interest, to the slight, unfair, and injury
of a qualified candidate who had a personal vested monetary interest which was lost as expenses
of the election race and the responsibility of the unqualified candidate to reimburse said expenses
to recover the Plaintiff’s actual monetary injury or loss representing his “personal stake” then
needed to support recovery with a favorable decision. This establishing standing, Sierra club v.
Environmental Protection Agency 292 F. 3d 895,901 (D.C. Circuit 2002), satisfying the
4
‘irreducible Constitutional minimum’ of Art III standing. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504
U.S. 555,560,112 S. Ct. 2130,119 L. Ed 2d 351 (1992).
a. The Plaintiff has been denied access Joinder to this action by Orly Taitz esq.
preponderantly because she felt the military defendants provided the best chance for
the action, and has for that matter has held against Plaintiff due in part by his action
against Senator John McCain in the Federal Las Vegas Court filed on the same claim
that Senator McCain was not a Natural Born Citizen and thereby was not qualified to
be a Presidential candidate giving the nature for this action, however she did
recommend Plaintiff file the Amicus Curiae which he did giving merit to substantiate
the argument. (see a sample of emails with dates back to the filing of this case Orly
From:
Orly Taitz (dr_taitz@yahoo.com)
Sent: Thu 7/09/09 2:51 PM
To: cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
please, fedex it to judge Carter
From:
Orly Taitz (dr_taitz@yahoo.com)
Sent: Tue 5/26/09 12:20 AM
To: Cody Judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
Dear Mr. Judy, this is to cinfirm that I will fly to Utah to meet with governor Herbert and provide information regarding Mr. Obama's lack of
5
eligibility for presidency. List of my plaintiffs is attached. Sincerely Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ re Applicants ( all applicants of this action listed).
From:
cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
www.codyjudy.us
Ltr to Senator(s)
The one good thing I believe about my case is that I challenged McCain's birth with expert
testimony which had researched the laws at the time of McCain's birth and found and argument for "a
naturalized" status. The Judge was a bugger and delayed and delayed my case until the case was moot. I
also exhibited Phillip Berg's Cert. in Berg v. Obama before the U.S. Supreme Court as an "Emergency
Exhibit of Evidense" in my case Judy v. McCain.
I guess the point is my campaign and I went through alot of trouble as a "candidate for
President " that had "standing" and proven "direct harm" in a case, we felt justice did not prevail. If there
is anything we can do to help you please let us know. If you need an Amicus or testimony in any way
shape or form please feel free to call on me.
Thank you for your work and great defense for our U.S. Constitution!
Your Brother in Freedom and Liberty Cody Robert Judy www.codyjudy.us 801-497-6655
codyjudy@hotmail.com
6
6.Plaintiff does not assert or expect the Courts power to over reach on a Legislative Duty of
removal of office due to an unqualified candidate. This court is humbly requested to interpret the
simple definition of the ‘ Natural Born Citizen’ clause of the U.S. Constitution to justify and
appropriate or negate the Plaintiff’s claim for relief against the Defendant.
The residual power of discrete and insular minorities to protect not only their own
Constitutional rights but to assert the Constitutional rights of all the people, is one of the great
And perennially recurring Constitutional Conundrums in American legal history (cf United
States v. Caroline Products Co.,304 U.S. 144, footnote 4 ‘the most famous footnote in history’)
Plaintiff is a Natural Born United States Citizen and Candidate of the 2008 Presidential Election,
and a discreet and insular minority who demands full enforcement and respect, by the authority
of the First, Second, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment preserving rights to the people, of the
Constitutional clause of Article II of the Constitution stating, “No person except a Natural Born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be
eligible to the Office of President”. The secondary statement of this clause concludes the
Founders of the Constitution were subject citizens of Britain, and in understanding this and their
own non-natural born citizenship either by soil and by parental ancestry, placed an exception in
the clause for their own individual circumstances “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of
the adoption of this Constitution”: The significant note being the missing “Natural Born” clause
from “Citizen of the United States” at the time of the adoption of this Constitution. Defendant is
not a qualified candidate person for either the first part of the clause Natural Born Citizen, or a
qualified candidate person for the second part of the clause “Citizen of the United States at the
7
7. Though petition Judy v. McCain case no. 2:08-cv-01162 submitted an “emergency exhibit of
evidence” containing a co-complaint certiorari against Barrack Obama at that time under the U.S.
Supreme Court consideration, Barrack Obama was not named in that complaint as a Defendant,
mostly because McCain at that time offered a more direct threat to attract more of the
conservative type voters of which Plaintiff’s platform revolved and for which he was vying and
it is important to note that complaint was filed days before McCain was named the Republican
nominee and served upon the National Republican Executive Chairs. In the preponderance of
winning, had the Judge in Judy v. McCain made a summary judgment on the constitutional
question of qualification the resulting impact would have altered the race at the pre-convention
nominee mark of the presidential contest when all parties were equal in not being on the ballot,
and in probabilities would have altered the entire 2008 election results as sure as any equation
probability is altered with numbers. On the flip-side of the argument, which states altering the
equation numbers of an election would equal the same sum falls into illogical and unreasonable
non-sense and begets the question, “ Why have an election?”, or “What is an election if the same
sum or outcome is unavoidable?” The considered answered being of course an elaborate tyranny.
8. For the courts consideration, Plaintiff will briefly consider the natural born citizen deficiencies
of both Barrack Hussein Obama and John McCain in contemplation of the standard of the
Constitution equally and without prejudice towards any particular person, understanding the
combined total of the argument presents a total of near 97% of the vote for Obama and McCain
and rather 3% who are not considered taken in fraudulently with their vote for an unqualified
candidate. While there may be an argument to the Plaintiff not rummaging many votes, an active
3% of the population actually fought in the Revolutionary War and the success was seen.
Correspondingly, Plaintiff is among other candidates in the minority percentage on this issue not
to be dissuaded on the Constitutional Standard applied Allen Keyes being one of them. Plaintiff
8
makes this annotation to rescue the fact that just because the 2nd place finisher of the race didn’t
bring the complaint to the court, does not mean the interpretation of the Natural Born Citizenship
clause of the Constitution of the Republic, not of the Democracy, should carry less weight,
especially considering the 2nd place finisher is shown by Plaintiff to be just as much in question
on the Constitutional Soundness of the Natural Born Citizen clause, as the 1st place finisher. If it
wasn’t so, why would a special un-constitutional non-binding resolution of the Senate known as
Senate Resolution 511 even have been necessary, and supported by 2 of the major candidates of
the opposing party, one of which ended up a declared winner? Senator Barrack Hussein Obama.
bringing more of a burden to him than any particular citizen bringing the constitutional claim to
the court, including any U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmen, any of the 50 State Governors or
Big City Mayors, famous retired Judges and attorneys who by law all are regulated to the same
status as any other citizen not having standing in the presidential race of 2008. Furthermore, the
general thought on military standing has also been frowned upon by the Court as having
‘standing’ in cases found in California, Texas and Georgia finding men and women owing to
their oaths to support and defend the Constitution under mixed emotions to question in that duty
the qualifications of the Commander In Chief of the military rendering severe punishments for
dereliction of duty for the conscientious objector regardless of rank from private to major general.
The unique position of the Plaintiff may be argued upon his discretionary background which
also is a disruption of the majority, but rather uniquely found it’s way into the emblems of
Constitutional protection of the 13th Amendment, Sect 1 in 1865, making neither prior slavery
nor prior involuntary servitude a past which prohibited a run for Federal office. Furthermore the
Plaintiff cites standing authority of Morrison v. Olson from 1988, Bowsher v. Synar from 1988,
Flast v. Cohen from 1968 and in 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller which states ordinary
9
citizens of the United States have the right to enforce the Constitution of the United States and
10. Smith v. Allwright 321 U.S. 649 (1944) undertaken by the United States Supreme Court was,
is an action by a national political party “governmental action” for purposes of enforcing Article
II and Amendment XIV of the United States Constitution? The Court in Smith v. Allwright,
examined whether the action of the political party was a state action or private action. It was
determined that since primaries were conducted by the party under statutory authority, the party
was an agency of the state insofar as it determined the participants in the primary election. The
party took it’s character as a state agency from the duties imposed on it by the state statutes, and
the duties did not become matters of private law, simply because they were performed by a
political party. Lending credit to the fact that Department of Justice is miserable in its conduct
a. .Representing private individuals who are a candidate, or who maybe in office in a false
b. Representing and individual who ought to be under investigation of the case of material
action of fraud, by sworn false statement of material fact perpetrated upon Plaintiff as a
candidate, and all U.S. Citizens, causing a misleading degree of thought of eligibility
while in the process of casting their ballot for the Presidential elections of 2008.
10
REVIEW U.S. SOURCE OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN DEFINED
11. Plaintiffs ask this Court to declare and adjudge what the framers of the constitution used,
and that this Court must therefore apply in this case of first impression, the definition of the
Natural Born Citizen contained in “The Law of Nations or, Principles of the Law of Nature,
applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns” by the Swiss philosopher and
“…natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the
citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to
all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owns
to its own preservation: and it is presumed, as a matter of course, that each citizen, on
entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it.
The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true
citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see, whether, on their coming to
the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the
society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is
necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for if he is born there of a
foreigner, it will only be the place of his birth, and not his country”.
12. http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/vattel/:
The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)
a. This Court should apply the De Vattel definition used by the framers of the constitution,
11
defining “Natural Born Citizen” for following reasons:
b. De Vattel’s treatise existed at the time of the creation of the Constitution, as it was
c. Emmerich de Vattel’s was widely quoted by the framers of the constitution, for example,
d. His book provides an exact and contemporaneous definition for the term used “Natural
Born Citizen”
Constitution
f. The Vattel definition was used as a basis for the non-binding Senate resolution 511 of
2008.
g. Apparently during the Constitutional Convention, John Jay wrote on July 25, 1787 to
George Washington:
American Army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born
citizen”
h. In explaining the meaning of Natural Born Citizen, a principal framer of the 14th amendment,
which redefined citizenship under the Constitution, John Armor Bingham explained that the
phrase referred to “every human being born in the jurisdiction of the United States (not
controlled to territories) and parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty”
12
meaning at least mother and father were “naturalized citizens” received in the process of
13
14
EXAMINATION OF CANDIDATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN FAILURES
Gabriel J. Chin
Abstract:
Senator McCain was born in 1936 in the Canal Zone to U.S. citizen parents. The
Canal Zone was territory controlled by the United States, but it was not
examined the law and issued a detailed opinion offering two reasons that Senator
McCain was a natural born citizen. Neither is sound under current law. The
Tribe-Olson Opinion suggests that the Canal Zone, then under exclusive U.S.
citizenship to "all persons born . . . in the United States." However, in the Insular
Cases, the Supreme Court held that "unincorporated territories" were not part of
the United States for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, many decisions hold
15
that persons born in unincorporated territories are not Fourteenth Amendment
citizens. The Tribe-Olson Opinion also suggests that Senator McCain obtained
citizenship by statute. However, the only statute in effect in 1936 did not cover
the Canal Zone. Recognizing the gap, in 1937, Congress passed a citizenship law
applicable only to the Canal Zone, granting Senator McCain citizenship, but
eleven months too late for him to be a citizen at birth. Because Senator John
McCain was not a citizen at birth, he is not a "natural born Citizen" and thus is
birth is contrary to the purpose seen as the ‘soil’ argument by the Founders intent
military man's wife not being able to get to U.S. Soil because she was on leave as
if she was drafted into the military. There are millions of people serving in our
military who cannot run for President because they are not 'natural born citizens',
yet it is no reflection on their service and no insult that they cannot run for
President. I suspect the Constitution is in their minds regarding their oaths, rather
than the 1 in 100 million who perhaps might have an heir who wants to be
President. Plaintiff’s considered advice, “get your wife to U.S. Soil to give birth
if that's an issue for you”. Principle of the 'natural born citizen' clause of the
Constitution should not be vacated for the 1 in 100 million who chooses to keep
his wife on leave with him rather than sending her to U.S. Soil, neither was the
clause’s intent by the Founders imprinted for such a frivolous argument shown
16
14. And as otherwise represented in District of Nevada, Las Vegas, Judy v. McCain
15. As related Non-binding Senate Resolution 511 Resolved, That John Sidney
McCain, III, is a ‘natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of
the United States,” declares the resolution co-authored by Senators Patrick Leahy,
Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Claire
The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators
Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom
Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the
matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. If there was indeed a question
why would a Non-binding Senate Resolution even be necessary? This certainly does not
work to run around the Constitution nor propose a new way to Amend the Constitution.
a.Excerpt 1
“From the beginning, the story of JS McCain III’s birth is suspect. The argument that he is not
qualified to be president because he was not born on sovereign U.S. territory has merit.
Additionally, as this research reveals, both of his parents may have been foreign nationals and
the same controversies surround the true identities of JS McCain I and JS McCain II—his
"grandfather" and "father."
Recall that no substantial records exist for any legitimate "McCain" lineage outside of
biographical accounts, though the records for a "McCann" lineage have been proven beyond a
17
reasonable doubt via the discovery and cross-referencing and examination of shipping manifests,
crew’s lists, and military records. Both the "McCains" and the "McCanns" lied about who they
are/were, and any admissions or denials by them are suspect and should be subjected to objective
scrutiny.
The birth records of the "McCanns" in Scotland are also fictitious.The birth and marriage records
of Katherine Davey Vaulx (wife of JS McCain I), Roberta Wright (wife of JS McCain II) and
Rowena Wright (Roberta’s twin sister) are equally suspect. The "Wright" clan is fictitious—birth,
marriage, death and Social Security records of Archibald Wright, Myrtle Fletcher and John
Luther Maddox being virtually nonexistent.”
b. Excerpt 2
“The "feel-good stories" about the "McCain" family of military "heroes" portray the very
elements of brainwashing born out of the Tavistock Institute in London, England. Tavistock,
formerly Wellington House, was funded by the British monarchy and the Rockefeller banking
dynasty to advance the science of mass brainwashing and mind control.
What reasoning justifies such promotion to the rank of admiral? The only logical explanation is
that King Edward VII and his son George V, the half-brother of "John McCann," were pulling
the strings of the American government from 1860-1936. The plot was hatched and facilitated
during Prince Albert Edward’s visit to Canada and the U.S. in 1860 (see part 1), before being
implemented in 1892 and continued, at least, to the conclusion of George V’s reign as "king-
emperor" on January 20, 1936.
George’s reign also experienced a rise in socialism, fascism and Irish republicanism. And it was
George V who hid the origins of the British royal family by changing his family’s German name,
"Battenberg" to "Mountbatten" upon his creation of the "House of Windsor."
Three U.S. presidents were assassinated after Albert Edward’s visit in 1860: Abraham Lincoln,
1865; James A. Garfield, 1881; and William McKinley, 1901 (Prince Albert Edward was
crowned King of England on January 22, 1901). McKinley’s death opened the door to the
presidency of Teddy Roosevelt, whose son was complicit in secreting the "McCann-McCain"
clan into the U.S. via his United States and Roosevelt Lines and then the U.S. Navy”
c.Excerpt 3
“The birth records from the Panama Department of Health do not contain the name of John
Sidney McCain, III. Those records (in book form) are retained by the National Archives.
The omission cannot be dismissed as a simple, bureaucratic "snafu" for several reasons. The U.S.
Naval Hospital at Coco Solo, Panama, could not have been the "birthplace" of JS McCain III,
who was purportedly born in 1936. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s "Executive Order 8981 -
Navy Hospital Area, Coco Solo, Canal Zone," was signed December 17, 1941. It authorized the
18
creation of the base hospital boundaries entitled, "Boundary Map of Navy Hospital Area, Coco
Solo, Canal Zone."
The land surveys for the hospital construction had been completed in May, 1941, nearly five
years after the birth of JS McCain III. The base had no hospital in 1936, so McCain could
not have been born on U.S. sovereign territory, even if the base was leased.”
“So, where was JS McCain III born? Who were his parents? Who were his grandparents? Who
were his great grandparents? A sufficient lack of evidence proves that four generations of
"McCains" cannot prove that they are McCains.
The evidence shows that JS McCain III, through his father and grandfather, is directly connected
to the British Crown via Prince Albert/Edward VII.
Historical accounts about Edward VII and his sons, Albert Victor, who himself was involved in a
case of ‘Illegitimacy’, and George Fredrick Ernest Albert (George V) included the recurring
descriptions of "inferior scholastic ability" and "little or no interest in learning." Both sons were
enrolled in the Royal Navy. The same traits were mirrored by all three generations of the
"McCain" family.”
17. No record exist of the place of Barack Hussein Obama’s place of birth ie.,
“long form birth certificate”. It should be noted that Certificates of Live Birth have been posted
via internet, is not proof of the long form birth certificate which has never been
produced confirming date and time, doctor, place, hospital, weight, and height of the baby and
Barack Hussein Obama certainly cannot remember his own birth. It is also noted that Barack
Obama has ordered every record accessible to the public towards his past and origin sealed.
The State of Hawaii has in its code a peculiar statute #338, that allows foreign born children of
Hawaiian residents to get Hawaiian birth certificates. Additionally, such birth certificates can be
19
obtained based on a statement of one relative only, without any unbiased, independent evidence,
such as a hospital birth certificate. This statute has a basis in precursor statutes going back to
1911, prior to creation of the state of Hawaii, as Hawaiian citizens wanted to transfer their
18. As Hawaii became one of the states in the Union, this provision was kept. Most
American citizens, had no knowledge of this provision, in 2008 election. One of the reasons,
was unwillingness of the Main Stream Media to talk about this issue. As demands were made to
obtain such records, those demands were rebuffed and responses were provided, that only
relatives or parties with tangible interest could obtain a copy of one’s birth certificate. The
following is an example of what Obama offered himself on his fightthesmears.com web site.
20
19.
20. Circumstantial evidence however has reported Barack Hussein Obama being born in Kenya
in 2004.
21
21. This is a Certificate of birth from the Coast Province General Hospital recording Barack
Hussein Obama’s birth in Kenya with much more information on it. Barack Hussein Obama has
never released any record from the Hawaii known as a long form birth certificate.
22
22. Random example of a ‘state of Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth confirming State of birth
regarding Native Born or Soil confirmation.
23. Barack Obama's father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of
the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama's birth, then Senator Obama was a British
23
Citizen "at birth", just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to
produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn't be eligible
to be President.
24. The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth, were also British Citizens. This
provides the reasons why the Framers declared that, while they were Citizens of the United
States, they themselves were not "natural born Citizens". The inclusion of the grandfather clause
a. No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the
time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President;
25. The Framers needing to make themselves eligible for President didn't want future
Country. While the Framers declared themselves not eligible to be President as "natural born
Citizens", they wrote the grandfather clause (which no one living today qualifies under) in for
the limited exception of allowing themselves to be eligible to the Presidency in the new nation
26. The Framers distinguished between "natural born Citizens" and "Citizens". Clearly
noted in 14th Amendment terminology of "Citizen", not "natural born Citizen". The Framers
were Citizens, but they weren't natural born Citizens. They put the stigma of not being natural
born Citizens on themselves in the Constitution thus creating a separation of trust for POTUS.
27. Obama states he was born, in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. His mother was an American
woman, Stanley Ann Dunham, and his father was Barack Hussein Obama Sr. – a citizen of the
24
United Kingdom and Colonies born in Kenya, which was still a British colony. Obama Sr. was in
the United States on a college scholarship and was neither a citizen nor a permanent resident of
the United States. Because of the citizenship status of his father, Obama Jr. was governed by
British citizenship laws at the time of his birth. The law that governed Obama Sr. and his
children was the British Nationality Act of 1948. It stated the following:
“a.—(1) Every person who under this Act is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or
who under any enactment for the time being in force in any country mentioned in subsection (3)
of this section is a citizen of that country shall by virtue of that citizenship have the status of a
British subject.
b.“(2) Any person having the status aforesaid may be known either as a British subject or as a
Commonwealth citizen; and accordingly in this Act and in any other enactment or instrument
whatever, whether passed or made before or after the commencement of this Act, the expression
‘British subject’ and the expression ‘Commonwealth citizen’ shall have the same meaning.”
c. Barack Obama Sr. as a British citizen and subject to the laws of the British Nationality Act
(BNA). The following sections establish that Obama Jr. was subject to the same laws at birth:
d.“. Subject to the provisions of this section, every person born within the United Kingdom and
Colonies after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and
Colonies by birth.”
e.“ (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this
Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of
25
f. He was born a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies on August 4, 1961. If he was
in fact born in the United States, then it is possible that he acquired both United States and
British citizenship. If he was born in Kenya, as long as their father was previously a British
g. “. Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of
the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya
h “. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a
citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father
becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1),
i. Barack Obama Jr. was a British citizen at birth and a Kenyan citizen by virtue of the
adoption of the Kenya Constitution. At age 23, he lost his Kenyan citizenship if he did not
renounce his British or United States citizenship, take the oath of allegiance to Kenya, and
declare his intentions of residence in the country. However, at no point did he automatically lose
j. In the British Nationality Act of 1981, all previous citizens of the United Kingdom and
Colonies became “British Dependent Territories” citizens. This term was later amended to
k. “ Citizens of U.K. and Colonies who are to become British overseas territories citizens
at commencement.
26
l. “(1) A person shall at commencement become a British overseas territories citizen if–
(a) immediately before commencement he was a citizen of the United Kingdom and
Colonies who had that citizenship by his birth, naturalization or registration in a British
overseas territory; or
(b) he was immediately before commencement a citizen of the United Kingdom and
(i) who at the time of the birth (‘the material time’) was a citizen of the United Kingdom
(ii) who either had that citizenship at the material time by his birth, naturalization or
registration in a British overseas territory or was himself born to a parent who at the time
m. In 1981, Obama became a British overseas territories citizen by virtue of the latest BNA,
overseas territories citizenship’; and a person having that citizenship is a ‘British overseas
territories citizen.’”
p. As Obama’s East African father owed (by reason of his birth and as a matter of
international law) allegiance to British crown (whether or not he professed any), Obama was not
a Natural born citizen and does not qualify for presidency. Dual Nationality is a rather new
concept that did not exist at the time of creation of the Constitution and Plaintiff submit that the
27
definition used and the contemporaneous statements of the framers show a desire to exclude
from the group of Natural Born Citizens anyone, with any allegiance to other sovereignties at
28. The Constitutions commitment to the Electoral College regarding the responsibility to
select the President does not include the authority to decide whether a presidential candidate is
qualified outside the parameters of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution. Rather,
the Electoral College relies upon the National Party Executive Committees for the examination
of a candidates qualifications for office from which the declared nomination of said Party cause
in writing their favored nominee to be printed on the ballot of every state by sending to each
State respectively the nomination certificate which states the candidate is qualified. Williams v.
Rhodes 393 U.S. 23,43,89 S. Ct 5, 21 L.Ed.2d 24 (1968) (Harlan J. concurring) (“The [Electoral]
College was created to permit the most knowledgeable members of the community to choose the
executive of a nation.”). Thus the Democrat National Committee Members are seen as
Defendants in this case as two different versions of the Certification of Nomination have been
recovered. The easiest way to see the two are signed by the same people but in fact are two
different documents is by looking at the portion where the line of the signatures start with the
respective signature. The actions of these Defendants helped perpetrate the unconstitutional
qualifications of the candidate to a higher level within the election race and thus bear the burden
28
Defendants who were acting under color of state law and therefore are liable for their individual
29. http://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm
September 9th,2009 (excerpts of a-x)
a. “However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state
certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as
certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of this notarized document
myself. (Seen below in Paragraph #29)
b. Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, which those
offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the
document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these "certified"
candidates on the ballot.
c. The "Official Certification of Nomination" that was presented by the DNC in all fifty
states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the
new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was signed by Chair
of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice
Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008
d. But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;
e. "- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States
are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."
f. The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC
ticket was limited to, and I quote;
g. "THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the
United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the
following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice
President of the United States respectively: (Seen below in Paragraph #31)
h. Oops, another typo? The reference to Obama's constitutional eligibility was missing... An
accidental omission?
i. The text certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was "legally qualified to serve under the
provisions of the United States Constitution" had been removed from the document sent
to the states. And yes, I have a copy of this version of the DNC Official Certification of
Nomination letter too!
29
j. In fact, this version is in Election Commission files of all fifty state Election Commission
offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even
the same Notary of Public authentication, and absent the constitutional text.
k. Just in case you are wondering, the answer is yes. This version also includes the same
typo present in the version not submitted by the DNC, but including the constitutional
text, which means both documents have the same place of origin.
l. The individual at DNC headquarters who prepared this very important document was not
only a poor typist... they were sloppy enough to leave both versions of the signed
documents lying around.
m. The Implications
o. The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official
Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
p. One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the
text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
q. The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of
President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by
the DNC to elect Barack Obama President.
s. The RNC "Official Certification of Nomination" for John McCain and Sarah Palin reads,
and I quote: (Seen below in Paragraph 32.)
30
30. DNC Certificatation of Nomination stating “ following candidates legally qualified under
provisions of the United States Constitution”. This one was used in Hawaii requiring the
language.
31
31. This one omits qualifications to serve under U.S.C and simply states ‘duly nominated as
candidates of said Party.” And this is the one which was sent to get Barack Hussein Obama on
the ballot in most States.
32
32. The Republican Certificate of Nomination for John McCain showing “meeting the
constitutional requirements” language.
33
u. But it is NOT there in the DNC Certification of Nomination that the DNC used to certify
and elect Barack Hussein Obama President and Joseph Biden Vice President of the United States
of America.
v. Last, the fact that TWO DNC Certifications exist, both signed, dated and notarized by the
same individuals on the same day, means that a very real conspiracy to commit election fraud
was underway, and since it took until six months after the election to uncover it, the conspiracy
was indeed successful.
w. Are you still wondering why Barack Obama has spent nearly $1.5 million in taxpayer's
funds to race Department of Justice lawyers around the country to stop all cases questioning
Obama's eligibility before discovery can force Obama to open up his top secret life?
x. Last, this story confirms that some form of a conspiracy to mislead and ultimately defraud voters
took place at the top of the Democrat Party. No story in recent history is of greater gravity.
CAUSE OF ACTION
33. Plaintiff alleges that his/my constitutional rights, privileges, or immunities have been
violated and that the following facts form the basis for my allegations from Obama’s own
endorsed website we see the term of citizenship used: “Native Citizen”: this is not a “Natural
Born Citizen” but a term used to describe one who is born in the United States to parents 1 or
more who are not U.S. Citizens strictly prohibited by the standard of Natural Born Citizen within
the context of the U.S. Constitution. Barack Hussein Obama being an alleged and self admitted
“native citizen” is a self admission of not being a Natural born citizens for which term would be
proper by any qualified candidate running for the office of the President with the slightest clue of
qualifications.
34
34. Barack Hussein Obama’s ‘fight the smears” website claims Mr. Obama is a “native born
The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native
citizen of the United States of America.
Next time someone talks about Barackʼs birth certificate, make sure they see
this page.
35. Barack Hussein Obama’s running for president, was/is an “election qualified candidate
competitive unfairness” to Cody Robert Judy, herein the Plaintiff, who is a “natural born citizen”
and meets the U.S. Constitutional qualifications as a “natural born citizen” to run for the office
of President according to U.S. Constitutional law, born in Idaho Falls, Idaho to two parents who
are citizens. Father- Robert O. Judy born Idaho Falls, Idaho and Mother- Ali (Jeppson) Judy born
Salt Lake City, Utah. While further review of eligibility of the sitting President may rest with
Congress, it is within the Courts power and indeed obligation to review the Plaintiff’s
Qualification Tort claim between two persons. While the 20th Amendment gives Congress the
task of selecting a President when a President is found elected by the Electoral College but not
satisfying the Constitutions eligibility qualifications, the language is not specific as to the source
35
or way by which a candidate is found ineligible, and certainly does not prohibit the Courts
consideration between two parties. Furthermore the20th Amendment has no time frame in which
a President can be found ineligible and the standing committees of the House and Senate while
set up to hear questions regarding the presidential elections, they are not preferred for tort claims
within Constitutional contentions between parties but handle broad questions of general natures
a. Mr. Obama has spent money to run for the Presidential race.
b. Mr. Judy has also spent money to run for the Presidential race.
36
iii.) The “non-binding” resolution of the United States Senate
Hussein Obama.
The Congress was not consulted- this left out half of the
1. As a citizen and a candidate, the Plaintiff is affectively guaranteed all the rights and
privileges enamored in the U.S. Constitution, and has standing. The injury of Mr. Obama’s
ineligibility as President towards the Plaintiff is seen as a disruption of said rights, threatens
the plaintiff’s liberty and independency as a citizen and did as a candidate, as the United
States’ standard of the U.S. Constitution preserves individual rights identifying a boundary of
just social interactions, in the presence or absence of government. In a pure form, to reward
the Defendant no responsibility for the Plaintiff’s claims is to deny Plaintiff all of his
Constitutional Rights and indeed deny him his unique qualification as a natural born citizen.
a- As Mr. Obama is in fact acting as President, wither just or unjust, the U.S.
Constitutional law of “natural born citizen” has been defected upon plaintiff. This is
37
not about “second class citizenship”, but rather honoring the law until such time as
America, depends on protection, rights secured, for his independence and liberty,
through the standard of the U.S. Constitution, the threat of violence by aversion to the
penalty for such “threats” may be lighter than “actual” violence. Mr. Obama’s run for
the Presidency did constitutes a “threat” of violence to the U.S. Constitution towards
Plaintiff, if now Mr. Obama is elected it does constitute “actual” violence to the U.S.
Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent
of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of the
Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it and to institute new
Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in
such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed will dictate that Governments long established should not be
changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn
that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right
c- If the issue of NBC is non-justiable, and the whole of the American public were seen
as ‘taken’ in the election, the example of our Republic and in fact Democracy around
the world in elections contrived as fair would altogether cease from the world. The
38
United States as a beacon of light for freedom and liberty must forever strive to
eradicate the nefarious contempt for law the consorts of tyranny and oppression offer.
67–306
2000
37. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOREIGN-BORN CITIZENS TO BE
PRESIDENT
38. Excerpt 1
''. . . it will require other talents and a different kind of merit to establish him in the esteem and confidence
of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful
candidate for the distinguished office of president of the United States''—thus writes Alexander Hamilton
in Federalist No.68. Indeed, the ''chief magistrate'' who is also Commander-in-Chief has to grow from
the soil.
39. Excerpt 2
a. I came to this Country in 1959, and became a citizen in 1964. During my formative years
in Hungary, I read as much American literature as American students might have in the high schools of
yore. In my second year of residence, I married a native-born American, and henceforth spoke English
exclusively in my home. Before and after taking the oath of citizenship, I have made continuous and
extensive efforts to become American, not only in the administrative sense of the word. In the course of
my life, spent mostly as a performing artist and academic, I had the opportunity to start a small
corporation and run for elective office—both of which are indispensable for the comprehension of
America.
b. My interest in, and commitment to, the principles upon which this Nation was founded
prompted me to establish a small Think Tank—called Center for the American Founding—that connects
today's issues with those principles. I write a regular column, and have published a book about American
political philosophy. My fellow Americans honor me frequently in word and deed very much as one of
39
their own.
c. Yet, Mr. Chairman, I wish to state unequivocally that, despite all of the above, I would
not consider myself eligible to the office of president of the United States.
d. The people of this land are possessed of a unique brand of tolerance, a balanced
temperament, and a natural goodwill toward the world. While such persons may be found everywhere,
they constitute an overwhelming majority among Americans. One of the inexplicable miracles of America
is the transformation that occurs within one generation, no matter how different the customs and mores of
the new arrivals.
39. Excerpt 3
In addition, liberty is not simply a blessing guaranteed by the Constitution, but an inner state of
being, again separating Americans from most others. An overwhelming majority of immigrants arrive on
these shores looking, as they had always done, to government as a source of benefits, and an authority to
obey.
40. Excerpt 4
Those who favor the proposed amendment will no doubt point to exceptional persons of their
acquaintance who, in their view, would fulfill any and all expectations with regard to the office of
president, though being of foreign birth. Yet the laws of this country never have been written with the
exceptions in mind. Among other things, the Framers of the Constitution distinguished themselves by
writing few laws, and employing language at once broad and concise, so as to be applicable to all
circumstances at all times
41. Excerpt 5
b. Let us consider a few scenarios. Start with an extreme example. The espionage
agencies of a number of countries, doubtless including the United States, have sometimes
employed what in the spy novel is called an agent under deep cover. A young person is
thoroughly trained and indoctrinated before being sent to an enemy country, where he or she
becomes a citizen and an exemplar of respectable behavior. This goes on for years, even decades,
until the parent agency determines that it is time to activate the agent. It is not difficult to
imagine such a person obtaining an office of great trust. But a Senator is one of 100, and a
40
Representative is one of 435. What check is there on the president who is one of one, except for
the constitutional restriction?
c. Should that seem too remote a possibility, consider a more likely case. A person
comes to America from country ''X'' as a young man, takes out citizenship, become thoroughly
Americanized, and is as loyal to his adopted country as can be. Nonetheless, in dealing with his
original country he is bound to be influenced by his nativity, whether in the form of hostility or
favoritism. Even should he prove able to rise above his prejudices and deal with the old country
objectively, he would still be widely regarded as prejudiced, and the media would fan such
suspicions. As commander in chief, it is not enough to be above reproach, one must be above the
suspicion of reproach.
d. Let me cite a more tangible example, one closer to recent experience. We all
know a number of Cuban-Americans. They are loyal to our country, now their country too. They
are pillars of their communities and are more fiercely patriotic than most natural born Americans.
And yet, as the recent to-do over Elian Gonzalez demonstrated, few of them are able to regard
Cuba dispassionately or treat relations with Castro's Cuba with equanimity. Suppose we had had
a Cuban-born president in the White House at the time of the Gonzalez controversy. Would that
president have been able to retain objectivity and, as importantly, any shred of credibility under
the circumstances?
42. Excerpt 6
a. Mr. VAZSONYI. I would not only agree in general, I would also cite a letter
written by Thomas Jefferson, I believe, in 1820, in which he says very clearly that all confidence
must be in the American people, who are the only repositories of a safe future.
b. But I also believe that political events can be influenced, and it is not unthinkable for
a foreign power, especially for a foreign power, perhaps I am going to cite China, a
country with an extremely long-term view of history, to arrange things perhaps on a
50-year plan to install someone on American soil and really hope to be able to run for
that office and put the necessary strength behind it.
41
PREVIOUS LAW SUITS AND ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
43. No other lawsuits in state or federal court that deal with the same facts that are involved in this
action or otherwise relate to the condition of this case have been filed by the plaintiff.
From:
cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
· caxford@utdemocrats.org
· tbeard@utdemocrats.org
· ttaylor@utdemocrats.org
· wholland@utdemocrats.org
· maywood7@aol.com
For this reason I endeavored in a law suit Cody Judy v. John McCain and the Republican
National Committee , which was served 2 days prior to John McCain's nomination by
the Republican Party as a nominee for President in 2008. This action I was uniquely qualified for
as a Presidential Candidate with "standing", and I was the ONLY candidate willing to take on
the issue against John McCain. The case was not decided on the merits, but declared 'moot' after
Obama won.
While I have not filed suit against Mr. Obama, I have filed an Amicus Curiae with the court in
42
California which is challenging his candidacy qualification on two grounds of his "natural born
citizenship" qualification: 1) His Parents who are not both U.S. Citizens- his Father known and
admitted to be a British Citizen which divides Barrack Obama's heritage to natural born status.
2) His actual birth place is yet unproven with a long form birth certificate which indicates the
hospital, attending Doctor, weight & height etc. and is not the document known as a COLB
issued by Obama's campaign staff on fightthesmears.com, which anyone from any country can
apply for within a year of a child's birth. All of these COLB's are sent to local papers for print in
the newspapes also, so abscent Obama releasing all the doc's he had spent a ton of money hiding,
I am standing on principle and sound law which amounts to consideration of parents combined
with birth origin to seal the qualification as "NBC".
I make no apologies for a defense of the United States Constitution and neither should any Party.
I declare boldly that there is a ratification process for amendment to the Constitution available
for anyone to pursue should they want it changed. However, in the interim, we as a
Constitutional Republic, being Democrat, Republican, or Independent rally around this
STANDARD OF LIBERTY, and it is that standard of which our Government Leaders are
bound by their oaths to take a stand. This however and sadly, has not been the case with Utah's
Senator Bennett as reported on my web site. He has repeatedly been written about the
STANDARD and has repeatedly denied it, as well as actually placing on record to me his
thoughts of laying aside the Constitution's sound doctrine, and certainly has lacked the courage
to defend it by calling for a simple defense legislative Hearing of Qualification for Verification,
which ultimately is the U.S. Att. General's defense claim in the Barnett v. Obama case,
citing Legislative Responsibility. You also may know already of the two differant 'Certifications
of Qualification' issued by the democratic leadership for Mr. Obama, that got his name on the
ballot of each individual state, one certifying he was qualified per se to the Constitution, the
other abruptly left out for most states. I declare if this house of cards goes down, the Utah
Democratic Party could be in a neutral position in simply not condemning me as a candidate
asserting a legal defense for the Constitutional Standards that is a standard for all Americans
regardless of party affiliation.
The assertion that every state is independent within the Union is relative to every State
Democratic Party also being a little different than any other State Democratic Party as the scope
and gene pool of the Party dictates different issues may play roles with varying degrees of
importance to the particular region. For this reason I believe it is within the scope in the outlined
parameter of important platform consideration, that I can be considered an effective Democrat
Nominee for U.S. Senate. As it stands now neither U.S. Representative for Utah, in the U.S.
Senate, has the courage to take a stand for the Constitution in this most important issue relevant
to the direction of our country into a state of socialism a precursor to communism, in defiance of
the Republic for which we stand. I believe every party has had good candidates at particular
times. JFK had conservative principles for fiscal responsibility that would have been very
43
attractive to todays' Republicans. Truly, the platform of an individual can influence the direction
of a Party, and as influences goes, a conservative independent democrat with the right formula
could conceivably win the Utah
From:
cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
For your consideration upon ...this house of cards which is about to blow away! I'd say it
would be better to clean house then to have the house cleaned. This is Our Country we are
talking about and loyalty to the Party and against the Constitution of the Republic starts to sound
a little...well, treasonous. When authorities have information and fail to act upon it?
1- http://www.examiner.com/x-7715-Portland-Civil-Rights-Examiner~y2009m10d14-Barack-
Obama-and-State-of-Hawaii-on-the-ropes
"This is a scandal and cover-up 100 times the size of Watergate. This time, it won’t be just a
President resigning in disgrace, it will also be the DNC Leadership who will be under the
criminal investigation microscope for the cover-up, and it is a scrutiny they cannot withstand.
This is the reason Barack Obama is doing everything he can to keep people focused on the
irrelevant issue of his birth certificate. He would rather people be thinking about where he was
born rather than the citizenship that was conferred upon him by his British father.
The smoke and mirrors have cleared. This is no longer a partisan issue, partisan issues are
reserved for constitutional governments, which we do not have. There is only those who
understand the peril we are in, and those who do not, and we are all Americans.
Now, what are we going to do about it?"
44
Revealing that the media knew about his in 2004, but have been silenced about it in 2008 in the
greatest fraud every played upon the American Public.
2- http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm
Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records
from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former
husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.
3- Can you imagine the R's voting for Obama if they would have had this...starting about 5:11 ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lrf8DbrJH0
4- Don't forget the forms that CITIZENS gathered from across the US...They raise more
questions about his eligibility because all but the one from Hawaii was sign without the line that
he was eligible....The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm
5- Original, vault copy birth certificate: Not released (attorney's fees are estimated to be up to
about $2 MILLION now, instead of HI birth certificate fee of under $20 bucks)
Certification of Live Birth: Released: Document Experts state it is a FORGERY
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/22/obamas_born_conspiracy_obamas_bogus_birth_cert
ificate_exposed!.thtml
Obama/Dunham marriage license: Not released (if one exists)
Obama/Dunham divorce: Not released (discovered by independent investigators)
Kindergarten records: Not released; School claims records are"LOST" Records lost (this is a
big one -- see here -- read two frames)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license: Not released
Soetoro adoption records: Not released
Fransiskus Assisi School School application: Not released (discovered by independent
investigators) Click here for proof/details.
Punahou School records: Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce: Not released (discovered by independent investigators)
http://orlytaitzesq.com/drorlytaitzesq/documentation/SOETORODIVORCE.pdf
45
Selective Service Registration: Not released (Obtained via Freedom of information act
request; received FORGERY?)
http://orlytaitzesq.com/drorlytaitzesq/documentation/SSSGov.doc
Occidental College records: Not released
Passport: Not released, records scrubbed by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Possible to have U.S. Passport without providing birth certificate, click here for more details.
Columbia College records: Not released
Columbia thesis; "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament"; Not released
But an anti-war plan to disarm America article written by Obama was found;
http://orlytaitzesq.com/drorlytaitzesq/documentation/obamaantimilitary.pdf
Harvard College records: Not released
Harvard Law Review articles: None
Illinois Bar Records: Not released
Illinois Driver's License Record: Not released (discovered by independent investigators) Click
here for details.
Baptism certificate: None
Medical records: Not released
6-What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So, how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June, 1981, without the price of a
hotel
room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport
was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have
answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
46
State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981, he was traveling either with a British
passport or an
Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport, that would provide proof he was born in Kenya on
August
4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And, if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that
would
tend to prove he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to
being
adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become
a
"natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008. Given the destructive nature of his
plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan
he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
7- Amicus Curiae filed by Cody Robert Judy with pertinent information about a U.S.
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN vs. A Citizen of the U.S.
If you don't care if YOUR President is not a natural born citizen, perjured himself in his
presidential certification process, resign your post, because this is America and we are a
Constitutional Republic, and eveyone in every party must respect the Supreme Law of the Land,
or invite chaos as your bed partner.
47
3/27/08 Fred Hollander v. John McCain and the Republican National Committee
Civil No. 08-cv-099-JNL, Opinion No. 2008 DNH 129*
Based on the United States Constitution’s provision that only a "natural-born citizen" is eligible
to be President of the United States, the plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that Senator John
McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee for the Presidency, is ineligible for that office due
to his birth in the Panama Canal Zone. The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the
case, ruling that the plaintiff lacked standing under his theories that (1) he had a legally
participation in the New Hampshire Republican primary had made it more difficult for the
plaintiff’s chosen candidate to win, and (3) if McCain were elected but were subsequently not
allowed to hold the office due to his alleged ineligibility, the plaintiff would be
46. http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=1518
Welcome WorldNetDaily and Drudge Report readers! You have reached my “Eligibility Case Archive” page. This
is a listing of all defunct cases. To see a listing of currently pending cases that are publicly known at this time, please
see my Eligibility Lawsuits page.
48
• Concerned Citizens Encouraged to Contact US Attorney Over Eligibility
Defunct Cases:
• Texas:
o Judge: “This Court has no Jurisdiction.“
o Jody Brockhausen: Brockhausen v. Andrade (01/23/09)
AmericaMustKnow history
• Pennsylvania (Phil Berg): (01/21/09)
o January 16 Conference results: application for stay DENIED
o January 9 Conference results:
January 12: Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.
January 12: Petition DENIED.
o Berg v. Obama
• District of Columbia:
49
o L. Charles Cohen: Cohen v. Obama (12/30/08)
• Hawaii:
o Dismissed; important forensic examiner affidavit!
o Keyes v. Lingle (12/12/08)
• Connecticut (Cort Wrotnowski): (01/02/09)
o “Pidgeon reminds us that the Wrotnowski case is still “pending” and procedurally alive.“
o DENIED application for stay and/or injuction
o Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz
• New Jersey (Leo Donofrio): (12/08/08)
o DENIED application of stay
o Donofrio v. Wells
• Georgia:
o DENIED
o Rev. Tom Terry: Terry v. Handel (11/12/08)
AmericaMustKnow history
CONCLUSION
47. Plaintiff concludes:
50
1.) The Defendant is not a “Natural Born Citizen” and while he maybe native born
(remains unproven) he, however is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution as being “qualified”
2.) The 14th Amendment was not written to change the rules of who could be the
President, it was to determine citizenship, not to alter the qualifications of “natural born
between the Plaintiff and the Defendant have merit in the race, or election of 2008 and
Plaintiff’s claims assumes the “natural born citizenship” clause is the predominate claim
with which the Defendant has injured the Plaintiff with in the 2008 Presidential race.
3.) There have been attempts to Amend the U.S. Constitution regarding “naturalized”
or native citizens becoming president, as recently as the year 2000, but they have failed in
the legislative branch. Thus, the Congress has in fact mandated the will of the People in
proceedings as recently as 2000 and determined that the ‘Natural Born Citizen” clause
should be continued as a pillar in the Standard of the Constitution in the entirety from the
time it was set in place by the Founders in American History. As Congress has made the
laws and so did not amended the “Natural Born Citizen” clause, so this Court is appropriate
Natural Born Citizen as a prerequisite of qualification for President of the United States.
4.) No U.S. Government Branch of legal binding authority has to date ruled upon the
issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility question. Barack Hussein Obama’s oath of
51
declaration of candidacy that he signed stating he believes he met requirements to the State
Elections Clerk, in which his declaration was made, is a mistake of his honor and good
5.) That Barack Hussein Obama’s run for Presidency posed a constitutionally direct
illegal threat, a fair qualification declared an inequity between the parties, and a civil
injustice threat and action to the Plaintiff, Cody Robert Judy’s bid for the Presidency of
6.) Though hundreds of millions of dollars have been poured into Barack Hussein
Obama’s campaign from donations of American Citizens across the United States, they
have done so, in the “belief”, of only Barack Hussein Obama’s word and the
signed his declaration of candidacy, stating he was eligible according to the U.S.
Constitutional Requirements and they forwarded those to the respective States that allowed
This was a deceptive declaration that only courage for the U.S. Constitution will over rule
all the efforts of Mr. Obama’s campaign might seem more weight then the Plaintiff’s
humble $5,000, a web site, 8 commercials, and a staff smaller then the size of a classroom,
that is not the comparison to assert. Rather how could hundreds of millions of dollars, years
52
of campaigning, and all the efforts of Obama’ staffers compare and possibly carry any
weight in a document known as the U.S. Constitution, so valuable as to carry the weight of
our whole economy, every citizens rights of freedom and independence since the birth of
our nation, the character of every sacrifice for our nation in the bloody battlegrounds of U.S.
history, and the defense that Plaintiff makes for Liberty and Independence of the United
States? Barack Obama’s campaign is small issue to American History in Blood and
Economic prosperity. I the plaintiff, Cody Robert Judy, am only one man, who is in this
legal challenge. However the Standard for review is echoed by histories voices, hundreds
of millions of voices and trillions of dollars of the past speaking out from the dust, the
the gathering in Tea Party protest all over the nation , and the hope of our future whose
voices we have not heard yet but whom we hope have a future in freedom and liberty and
justice for all. These Constitutional Principles are yours and mine to hold and to cherish.
7) The “Natural Born Citizen” clause of the Constitution is in fact a two prong test.
The two prong test assumed by Plaintiff to be a prerequisite qualification in order to run for
President and as such also assumed to be President. The qualification to run is defaulted by a
candidate who fails either one of the two prongs namely:
b. Born to parents (both father and mother) who are United States Citizens.
The combination creates a ‘natural born citizen’ of which a base of loyalty, natural
inclination and secure trust reside in both nature and nurture arguments of a prospective
President of the United States.
i. Barack Hussein Obama fails in at least 1 of the two prong test for
qualification, and thus has injured the Plaintiff in the 2008 election
race. The same point is seen in a Danish literary fairy tale by Hans
Christian Andersen (2 April 1805 – 4 August 1875) about an emperor
swindled by two weavers who promise him a new suit of clothes
53
invisible to the stupid or to those unfit for their positions. The hoax is
exposed by a child claiming “The emperor has no clothes”. In
comparison, Mr Obama has no ‘Natural Born Citizen” qualification for
President of the United States required by the U.S. Constitution.
8) With the election of 2008 the two major parties had candidates that were not Natural
Born Citizens under the law at the time of their birth, the qualified standard by which the
2008 elections were held. This is not to say that the Standard could not be altered with a
Constitutional Amendment, however we have shown Congress clearly set the record
straight as recently as July of 2000, in defeating the standard to let foreign born citizens
(or non-natural born citizens) run for President. This was clearly the criteria and
qualification set in 2008 by U.S.C standards. If 3rd party candidates objecting to the major
candidates are not allowed in standing and jurisdiction to defend the U.S.C. Standard, the
court has affectively regulated the U.S. to a 2 party system which is a political bias and
dis-incorporates the 3rd party standards as well as write-in standards of U.S. and States
election laws respectively. Now this court has two Presidential Candidates in Plaintiffs in
this action; Cody Robert Judy and Alan Keyes who were in fact in the Presidential
standard by the defacto winner Barack Hussein Obama and the defacto runner up John
McCain, thus in the equality standard of balance the Court has equal contesting
candidates to equal un-qualified candidates and to avoid the political prejudice must
consider the “natural born citizen” standard by which the contesting candidates implore
54
INJURY
48. The defendant(s) actions have injured the Plaintiff, Cody Robert Judy, in two ways
1- As a fellow candidate for President of the United States, I have spent a little over $5,000
dollars on my campaign for U.S. President and if Barack Hussein Obama won the race,
but was indeed not qualified to run, my campaign would have not have suffered both the
money and time spent on the campaign in the result of election 2008, and publicity, time,
and money may have proven favorable for my candidacy and I may presume to have
won in the process of the race and before nominees’ were chosen by Political Parties,
more especially the Democrat Party to which I have been associated with in previous
elections of 2002 U.S. Congress and 2004 U.S Senate. Barack Hussein Obama’s
campaign, would have been apportioned apart to qualified candidates and that would be
calculable in the divisions of interest and favor, not limited to “all of it” for my
candidacy more especially had John McCain been knocked out of contentions with my
claim of action against his ‘Natural Born Citizen’ qualification dismissed as “moot”,
2- As a citizen of the United States I have been injured in the fell of the standard the U.S.
Constitution employs and pray for its sustained equivalence in liberty and independence
55
56
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR QUICK REFERENCE
1. Jurisdiction proper, parties, Federal Civil Action pg. 1-3
10. Brief excerpts of July 2000 Hearing before the 106th Congress Judiciary subcommittee on
defeated Amendment to allow foreign born citizens to run for President. pg 38-40
11. Previous law suits and administrative relief (two letters to Democrat Executive Committee
12. Prior court decisions brought in Federal Court including all eligibility cases archived
pg.47-49
57
Certification of mailing
I hereby certify that I MAILED a true and correct copy of the following :
“MOTION FOR PERMISSIVE JOINDER AND AMENDMENT TO THE (42 U.S.C. §1983 or §1985)
Postage prepaid, U.S. Mail, this 7th day of November,2009 to the following parties :
And
Mr.GEORGE S. CARDONA Acting United States Attorney Mr. LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United
States Attorney Chief, Civil Division Mr.ROGER E. WEST (State Bar No. 58609) Assistant United
States AttorneyFirst Assistant Chief, Civil Division Mr.DAVID A. DeJUTE (State Bar No. 153527)
Assistant United States Attorney Room 7516, Federal Building 300 North Los Angeles Street Los
Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2461/2574 Facsimile: (213) 894-7819 Email:
roger.west4@usdoj.gov david.dejute@usdoj.gov
58
EXHIBIT A
59