Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Sarah Hendrix Declaration and Opp to PI Birdt

Sarah Hendrix Declaration and Opp to PI Birdt

Ratings: (0)|Views: 108|Likes:
Published by Alan Beck
Sheriff may just have perjured herself
Sheriff may just have perjured herself

More info:

Published by: Alan Beck on May 13, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/14/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 2BN73479
Defendant.
1
ALGERIAR.FORD,CABarNo.289016
 
DeputyCountyCounselJEAN-RENEBASLE,CABarNo.134107
3
CountyCounsel
4
385NorthArrowheadAvenue,FourthFloor
5
SanBernardino,CA92415-0140Telephone:(909)387-5455
6
Facsimile:(909)387-4069
7
ElectronicMailAddress:Algeria.Ford@cc.sbcounty.gov
8
AttorneysforDefendant,SANBERNARDINOSHERIFF SDEPARTMENTUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT
 
11
CENTRALDISTRICTOFCALIFORNIA
 
JONATHANBIRDT,)CASENO.EDCV13-00673-VAP(JEM)))OPPOSITIONTOPLAINTIFF SEX)PARTEAPPLICATIONFOR)TEMPORARYRESTRAININGORDER)ANDTOSETHEARINGONASANBERNARDINOSHERIFFS)PRELIMINARYINJUNCTION;
 7
DEPARTMENT,)DECLARATIONOFS.HENDRIX
 
)AssignedtoDistrictJudge)VirginiaA.Phillips
 
DefendantherebyopposesPlaintiff sExparteApplicationbecause
21
thePlaintiffhasfailedtoprofferanyevidenceshowingthathewillbe
 
irreparablyprejudiced,thathecannotcomplywiththenormalMotion
23.
Schedule,orthathecansucceedonthemerits.
 3
 4
Plaintiff,
 5
vs.
 6 8
19
 
24
I
INTRO U TION
25
PlaintiffallegesheisaresidentofSanBernardinoCountyandthat
26
onFebruary26,2013,theSanBernardinoCountySheriff sDepartment
27
deniedhimaconcealedweaponspermit.Hefurtherallegesthatthis
28
denialviolatedhisSecondAmendmentrighttocarryaconcealed
 
OPPOSITIONTOPLAINTIFF SEXPARTEAPPLICATION
Case 5:13-cv-00673-VAP-JEM Document 33 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:268
 
#2BN7347
 
OPPOSITIONTOPLAINTIFF'SEXPARTEAPPLICATION
weapon.OnOctober22,2013,PlaintifffiledaFirstAmendedComplaint
3
(FAC),allegingConstitutionalviolations,andsoughtanOrderrequiring
4
theCountyofSanBernardinotoissuehimaconcealedcarrypermit.He
5
alsosoughtfeesandcosts.OnNovember08,2013,theSanBernardino
6
CountySheriff'sDepartmentfiledaMotiontoDismisstheFAC.PlaintifffiledaReplyonDecember
 S
2013.ArulingontheMotiontoDismissispendinginthisCourt.OnFebruary24,2014,Plaintiffthenfiledanex-parteApplicationwiththisCourtseekingarestrainingorderandahearingonapreliminaryinjunction.TheApplicationfailstoestablishwhysuchanApplicationisnecessary.howPlaintiffcontendshewouldsucceedonthemerits,orhowhewillbeirreparablyprejudiced.
II RGUMENT
27
8
9
 
1112
 3
14
 5
A.ExParteReliefisOnlyJustifiedinLimited,EmergencyCircumstances
 6 7
Exparteapplicationsaresolelyforextraordinaryreliefandare
18
rarelyjustified.MissionPowerEngineeringCo.v.ContinentalCasualty
 9
Co.,883F.Supp.488(C.D.Cal.1995).Theyareinherentlyunfair,posea
20
threattotheadministrationofjustice,debilitatetheadversarysystemandthegoaloftenappearstobetosurpriseopposingcounseloratleasttoforcehimorhertodropallotherworktorespondonshortnotice. at490.Further, whenunsupportableallegationsaremadeinregularnoticedmotions,theycan,toagreatextent,beneutralizedbya
 
well-preparedrebuttal.Inpaperspreparedonshortnotice,however,thelawyerstoooftensimplymakeallegationsthathavenosupportingevidencetobackthemup.Evenmoreperniciousisanothertendency:the
21
 
23242627
 8
Case 5:13-cv-00673-VAP-JEM Document 33 Filed 02/25/14 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:269
 
#2BN7347
 
advocatesdrawconclusionsthatappeartobesupportedbyvoluminousexhibits,butarenotborneoutwhentheevidenceisreviewedwithmore
3
deliberationandmorecarefulrebuttalthanispossibleinhastyhearingsonexpartemotions. at491.IntheexpartemotionfiledbyPlaintiffJONATHANBIRDT,alltheaboveconcernsabound.Defendanthasonly24hourstorespond,andDefendantistime-limitedfromfilingawell-preparedresponsetothenumerousallegationsinPlaintiff'sExParteMotion.Further,therequestappearstomerelybeanattempttoforcetheSanBernardinoCountySheriffsDepartmenttostopworkingonallotherwork.B.PlaintiffHasNotEstablishedThatALegitimate,EmergencyCircumstanceExists
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
12
13
AsthisCourthasstated, theopportunitiesforlegitimateexparteapplicationsareextremelylimited. InreIntermagneticsAmerica,Inc.,101B.R.191(C.D.Cal.1989).Alegitimatecircumstancemayarisewherethereissomegenuineurgencysuchthat immediateandirreparableinjury,loss,ordamagewillresulttotheapplicantbeforetheadversepartyorhisattorneycanbeheardinopposition. at192.Exparteproceedingsarealsoappropriatewherethereisadangerthatnoticetoanopposingpartywillresultinthatparty'sflightordestructionofevidence.
 9 :
at193.Afinalsituationmayarisewhenapartyseeksaroutineorder.Id.at192.Plaintiff'smotiondoesnotestablishthathefallsunderanyofthesecircumstances.
1
l intiffh snotshownth thewillbeirrep r blyprejudiced
Tojustifyexparterelief,theevidencemustshowthatthePlaintiff'scausewillbeirreparablyprejudicedifthemotionisheardaccordingtoregularnoticedmotionprocedures.MissionPowerEngineeringCo.v.
14
15
161718
19
 
24
 5
26
2728
3
OPPOSITIONTOPLAINTIFF'SEXPARTEAPPLICATION
Case 5:13-cv-00673-VAP-JEM Document 33 Filed 02/25/14 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:270

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->