AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF POLICY AND SCIENCE POST BUDGET HEALTH BRIEFING, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, CANBERRA, MAY 15
Page 1 of 18
Laying the foundations for a stronger health system
Ladies and gentlemen, good morning and thank you for the introduction.
The last time a Coalition Government handed down the health Budget, Tony Abbott was Health Minister.
It was 2007 and the seven years since have been challenging ones for the Australian health system.
Commonwealth expenditure has grown 46 per cent.
The pressure on Medicare, the PBS and public hospitals has been unrelenting, driven by an ageing population, chronic disease, and higher costs.
Page 2 of 18
We have seen wasted opportunities and failed experiments under National Health Reform, which promised much, but delivered little in the way of improved health outcomes.
So in this Budget, the Government is laying the foundations for a stronger, more sustainable health system a system that only a Coalition Government can deliver.
It is a Budget for now and the future. It draws a line in the sand on ineffectual programs; on duplication, waste and bureaucracy; and on unmanageable spending.
And it introduces unprecedented investments in medical research, along with new, tough but fair, ways to finance and sustain health care in the years ahead.
In this Budget, the Government is addressing the need to rein in growth in Medicare, the PBS and public hospitals by asking Australians to take more personal responsibility for their health, through modest contributions to the costs of their care.
Fundamentally, the Budget continues to protect those who are least able to look after themselves. We are not undermining the health safety net. We are making it stronger and fairer.
Page 3 of 18
We are cutting bureaucracy and red tape so that we can invest in rebuilding primary care and general practice, expanding the health workforce and improving cancer screening and mental health services.
We are providing better support for kids to get more physically active through sport.
And the centrepiece of the Budget is a $20 billion capital protected Medical Research Future Fund, to build a future for Australian medical researchers and for better health care.
This is unprecedented, not just in Australia but the world. It is an historic commitment in medical research.
And, as the Treasurer said on Tuesday night, it may well save your life, or that of your parents, or your child.
Three months ago I called for a national conversation as I put it then to help heal our health system. This Budget now takes the next step from talk to action with all Australians contributing to build a patient focused, sustainable and cutting-edge health system.
Thinking behind the Health Budget We have framed this Health Budget with four guiding principles:
Page 4 of 18
1. that we must spend taxpayer funds on programmes and services that improve health outcomes for Australians;
2. that bureaucracy and red tape should be cut, and efficiencies and productivity improvements continually found;
3. that people should take more responsibility for their own health, including through modest contributions to the cost of care; and
4. that we must set up the health system for the future.
Let me take you through some of the detail.
Patient contributions to improve sustainability
MBS
Ten years ago, the Commonwealth was spending $8 billion a year on the MBS. Today its $19 billion. Without policy change, in 10 years time it would be more than $38 billion.
That kind of growth is unsustainable and threatens the future capacity of governments to fund universal access to primary health care. So something has to change to reframe the parameters of the MBS.
Page 5 of 18
The Government has decided that that change will be a patient contribution of $7 for previously bulk billed visits to GPs, and for out of hospital pathology and diagnostic imaging services.
We consider this is a fair contribution from patients to help support a system that currently funds 263 million free Medicare services a year, to which the taxpayer through the Government - is currently contributing more than $30 per GP visit.
We are making parallel changes to ensure the incentives are right for doctors to charge only the $7 contribution for concession card holders and children, to make sure cost does not become a barrier to access.
These include a $5 reduction in the Medicare rebate, and a low-gap incentive replacing the bulk-billing incentive.
The number of calendar year services for which concessional patients will be charged the $7 contribution will be capped at 10 after which services will be free, as an additional protection for people who need frequent access to care.
To avoid setting up a perverse incentive for patients to attend public hospital emergency departments rather than GPs, we will also allow state and territory hospital managers to charge a small contribution for GP-type visits to emergency departments.
Page 6 of 18
We consider these changes are fair: the patient contribution of $7 contrasts with a taxpayer contribution of over $30; doctors will have incentives to charge only the low gap, and only up to a cap of 10 services per year; and these new parameters will reframe the MBS for a more sustainable future.
This reframed MBS will be supported by a new simple Medicare Safety Net, with lower thresholds to protect more families from high out of pocket expenses. It will also include a cap on benefits of 150 per cent of the Schedule Fee as a discipline to help prevent providers charging more simply to push patients over the taxpayer- funded safety net threshold.
These measures are not about taking money out of Medicare - we will continue to spend more than $20 billion on Medicare every year.
These measures are about strengthening Medicare. And with the help of all Australians we will ensure everyone can continue to affordably access world-class health care services.
PBS
The Government has also re-examined PBS co-payments in the Budget to ensure the PBS can continue to support the listing of the latest medicines, which improve patient outcomes and save lives, but which also come at increasing cost to the taxpayer.
Page 7 of 18
PBS expenditure is up 80 per cent over the past decade, with growth expected to average 4-5 per cent per year in coming years.
A major cost driver is the increasing expense of newly listed lifesaving medicines and technologies. For example, recently approved treatments for melanoma cost the Government up to $110,000 per patient per year.
General patients currently pay less than $40 per prescription for these treatments under the PBS, and concessional patients pay only $6.
In the Budget, the Government is asking patients to pay a little more for prescriptions, increasing the co-payment for general patients by $5 per script and for concessional patients by 80 cents.
We are also making a parallel adjustment to the PBS safety net, increasing the threshold for general patients by 10 per cent above CPI for four years and by two prescriptions per year for concessional patients.
Again, this will put the PBS on a more sustainable footing.
Page 8 of 18
We all benefit from a stronger PBS so everyone has a responsibility to contribute their fair share to keep the system affordable.
Our investment in the PBS will of course continue to grow from $9.2 billion in 2014-15 to more than $10 billion in 2017-18.
Public hospital funding
Spending on public hospitals, owned and managed by state and territory governments, is the fastest growing area of health expenditure.
Under the previous governments policy settings, which provided guarantees to the states and territories about absolute growth in the funding envelope no matter how many or how inefficiently services were being delivered, Commonwealth Government payments for public hospitals would grow by an unsustainable 10 per cent a year.
More discipline is needed. And more responsibility is needed from states and territories who are the owners and the managers of the public hospital system.
So in the Budget, the Commonwealth has decided it will not proceed with the previous governments funding guarantees.
Page 9 of 18
Neither will we proceed with ineffective National Partnership Agreements that muddy the waters of Commonwealth-State responsibilities and do not result in better, more efficient public hospital and other services.
Instead, we will pay growth funding for the next three years, equivalent to 45 per cent of the efficient growth in public hospital costs as defined by activity based funding arrangements.
In 2017-18, that growth funding will cease, and the Commonwealth will index its contribution to public hospital funding to CPI and population growth.
The Commonwealth will still make a significant contribution to this sector some $14.8 billion in 2014-15. And we are still increasing hospital spending by an average of 7 per cent over the next four years. What the Government will no longer be doing is funding inefficient and unrestrained growth.
We will be looking to the states and territories to exercise their own disciplines in this area, which is a clear state and territory responsibility under our federation.
Page 10 of 18
Streamlining bureaucracy to support better services
A major theme of the Budget across the Government is reductions in bureaucracy and red tape.
In the Health portfolio, we are rationalising bureaucracy and cutting red tape so that we can free up resources and redirect them into supporting better services and better health outcomes.
Rebuilding primary care and GP services
The first place we are starting is primary care. In the Budget, the Government is ending the inefficient experiment of the previous government that saw a new layer of primary health bureaucracy established across the country.
They set up 61 Medicare Locals, with unclear roles, mixed approaches to consultation and boundaries that didnt match local hospital networks.
In line with the recommendations of a recent review by the former Chief Medical Officer, Professor John Horvath, we will be cleaning this up. We will be establishing a smaller number of Primary Health Networks more focused on the important work of joining up patient care in the community to keep people out of hospital.
Page 11 of 18
The Primary Health Networks will have well-defined roles, greater economies of scale, be GP-led with clear processes for community and provider consultation, and will match the boundaries of the local hospital networks with which they will interact.
We will also be looking over the next few years at new and innovative ways in which we might fund and deliver primary health care, including through partnerships with private insurers.
The second place in which we are looking to rebuild primary care is by boosting its workforce.
The Budget increases Commonwealth-funded GP training places by 300, to a total of 1500, in 2015. It doubles the teaching payment to GPs for training medical students from $100 to $200 per three hour session. It provides 175 infrastructure grants for GPs in rural and remote settings to build training facilities in their practices. And it increases the funding available for incentive payments under the GP Rural Incentives Programme for GPs to work in rural and remote areas.
In addition, 500 more scholarships will be available to nursing and allied health workers over three years, on top of the more than 2,000 existing scholarships awarded each year.
Page 12 of 18
Supporting these measures, we are taking major steps to cut bureaucracy and red tape in areas supporting health workforce. The functions of Health Workforce Australia and GPET will be transferred to the Department of Health, and those agencies closed, achieving major efficiencies in the short term.
The Department will work in the medium term to find further efficiencies to free up more resources for workforce measures.
These measures actually result in a save and give a clear example of how we do not need to spend more money to improve services. The previous Government measured success in health by the amount of money it spent, not on improved patient outcomes. This Government is interested in spending taxpayer dollars on improving the health of Australians.
Additional agency closures and mergers
Building on the work in primary care to reduce bureaucracy and duplication, the Government will make further changes to Health portfolio agencies.
Rationalising a number of agencies will cut administration costs and corporate overheads, end duplication, redirect funds to frontline services, and enable the Government to deliver services and programs more efficiently and at lower cost.
Page 13 of 18
A number of agencies will be closed and their functions transferred to the Department of Health or other relevant Commonwealth bodies with like functions.
We will also be talking to the states and territories about the possible merger of six agencies and functions to support the establishment of a new health productivity and performance commission.
Investments in mental health and preventative health
The sustainability measures and efficiencies generated through these measures are enabling further investments in mental health and preventative health to better address key pressures on Australians health.
Seventy five per cent of all mental illness manifests in people aged under 25. So we are investing to improve information, early detection and treatment services by expanding the successful headspace service by 10 sites, to reach national coverage of 100 sites. We are also establishing a national centre of excellence in youth mental health at Orygen youth services at Parkville in Victoria.
We are investing $95.9 million to fast track the work initiated last time we were in government to roll out biennial bowel cancer screening services for Australians aged 50-74 years, in full compliance with NHMRC guidelines.
Page 14 of 18
This is a major investment in detecting a common cancer affecting many Australians while it is still treatable.
The Budget also demonstrates our commitment to doing more to encourage physical activity and tackle obesity, particularly among children.
One in every four of Australian children is overweight or obese. Its an alarming statistic.
Just as disturbing is that physical inactivity is estimated to cost the Australian health care system $1.5 billion a year in avoidable costs as a result of chronic disease. Clearly, this is unsustainable from both a health and economic perspective.
This Government does not want to tell Australians what to do or what to eat. We dont want to be in your fridges. But we do want to help people make their own healthy choices and we do want to encourage and support kids to get involved in sport and exercise.
The Governments $100 million Sporting Schools initiative in the Budget will support primary school children to take part in sport- based physical activity. Schools will get funding to run activities across up to 35 major sports for instance, football, netball, tennis and gymnastics for three terms each year before, during or after school.
Page 15 of 18
Im very excited about this program and I trust mums and dads and coaches and, of course, kids everywhere will be too. It will reach more than 800,000 children at about 5,600 primary schools and 80 secondary schools across Australia.
Finally, in the area of sport, the Government has announced $156 million for the 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games, mainly for infrastructure. This will mean a large number of jobs during construction, economic growth and a boost in sporting activity for the region, as well as world-class venues to showcase our athletes competing against the best on home soil and, hopefully, winning gold.
Forward-looking investments in medical research
A centrepiece of the Governments Budget, which will help set up Australias health system for a bright future, is the $20 billion capital protected Medical Research Future Fund. The Fund will provide more opportunities for Australias researchers, who already punch above their weight globally, to make new discoveries and to take the results of their research through clinical trials.
Page 16 of 18
Medical research has the potential not only to improve health outcomes for particular conditions and diseases, but also to improve clinical approaches and make our health system more sustainable.
Initial investment in the new Fund will come from the almost $1 billion in funds remaining from the previous governments Health and Hospitals Fund, as well as efficiencies and savings in health spending.
We all have a stake and medical research benefits all Australians.
When the Fund is fully mature, it is expected to generate $1 billion in earnings each year for medical research.
In addition to the Medical Research Future Fund, the Government will be investing a further $200 million in new funding for dementia research, delivering on a key election commitment. This will help find solutions for managing and hopefully preventing a condition that is growing in prevalence with the ageing population, and that is so distressing to patients and their families
Medical research not only makes good health sense, it makes good economic sense. Its a key driver of productivity and innovation in the health care sector, which employs more than one million Australians.
Page 17 of 18
It has been estimated that every $1 spent on health and medical research generates a health benefit valued at $2.17 thats a return on investment for the nation of well over 100 per cent.
Conclusion
As we look to the kind of health system we want for a modern Australia, we are rebalancing Australias health system to position it for the future introducing new approaches to health financing, streamlining bureaucracy to better support services, and making forward-looking investments in medical research.
This is not a band-aid solution. This is change for the long-term.
This Government is not interested in funding programmes that only provide benefits at the margins.
We will make a difference, and we will do so with the understanding from all Australians that social policy isnt free, and we can no longer put it on the nations credit card.
This Budget showcases our health commitments commitments to better health for all Australians commitments that are profoundly held.
Page 18 of 18
It also demonstrates our commitment sound economic and that good social policy and economic policy are not mutually exclusive.