PEOPLE, IT IS OFFICIAL - FROM OFFICE OF NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL - JUDGES ARE ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE FOR INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL ACTS AND TORTS AGAINST CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. SLAVERY AND TYRANNY IS BACK!
Original Title
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL SANDERS' AFFIDAVIT FOR MTD
PEOPLE, IT IS OFFICIAL - FROM OFFICE OF NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL - JUDGES ARE ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE FOR INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL ACTS AND TORTS AGAINST CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. SLAVERY AND TYRANNY IS BACK!
PEOPLE, IT IS OFFICIAL - FROM OFFICE OF NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL - JUDGES ARE ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE FOR INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL ACTS AND TORTS AGAINST CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. SLAVERY AND TYRANNY IS BACK!
NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, -against- MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY, Defendant. MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY, -X Third Party Plaintiff, -against- JOHN FASONE, YONATAN LEVORITZ, VICTOR KATKALOV, KINGS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, ELENA SVENSON, Defendants. STATE OF NEW YORK) ' ' : SS.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK) Index No. 056717/13 -X AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (Dear, J.) -X CHARLES F. SANDERS, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1.' I am an Assistant Attorney General in the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, attorney for defendant John Fasone, a support magistrate of the Family Court of the State of New York, Kings County ("Family Court")- This affidavit is submitted in support of his motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, any judge or support magistrate of the Family Court of the State of New York, Kings County is entitled to absolute judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, and the Third-Party Complaint is not a proper pleading under CPLR 1007. Prior Judicial Proceedings In Family Court, Kings County 2. On November 3, 2008, Elena Svenson filed a petition in the Family Court, Kings County seeking financial child support from Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky for their child. 3. After various submissions by the respective parties indicating their respective financial circumstances and proceedings held before Support. Magistrate Fasone, by Order of Support and Findings of Facts, both dated February 3, 2010, the Family Court (Fasone, Support Magistrate) determined and directed that Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky is to pay $2,045.00 monthly toward the support of the child at issue, and set the amount of support arrears as $31,599.42, from the date of the filing of the support petition with the Family Court. See April 2, 2012 Family Court Decision and Order and February 3, 2010 Family Court Final Order of Support collectively annexed hereto as Exhibit "A". 4. After the filing of various objections by Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky seeking a reduction and modification of the Final Order, by Decision and Order, dated April 2, 2012, the Family Court (Hepner, J.) denied the objections and further found that Family Court Act 439 empowers support magistrates to "hear, determine and grant any relief within the powers of of the court, including to determine findings of fact and a final order. See Exhibit "A": April 2, 2012 Family Court Decision and Order, p. 6. Present Action 5. By Third-Party Complaint, dated January 27, 2014, Third Party Plaintiff Michael Krichevsky, acting pro se, brings this third-party action against the third-party defendants, including John Fasone, a support magistrate of the Family Court of the State of New York, Kings ' County ("Family Court") claiming that the Third-Party Defendants are liable to him for the sums due in the original debt collection action brought against him by Plaintiff New Century Financial - 2 - Services, Inc. for charges he incurred using a credit card. See Third-Party Complaint. The Third- Party Complaint further states various contract and tort claims against the Third-Party Defendants, including "tortious interference with Citibank contract (Count 1); tortious interference with contract (Leon Constraction [sic])(Count II)"; "aid .and abet tortious interference with contracts (Count III)"; aid and abet fiduciary duty (Count IV); and extortion, harassment, and concerted actions (Count VI). See Third-Party Complaint, fflf 27-181'. Third- Party Plaintiff Krichevsky seeks a monetary judgment for compensatory, punitive and treble damages for an unspecified amount, and a declaratory judgment by the Civil Court that he was denied his constitutional rights in custody proceedings before the Family Court. See Third-Party Complaint, Wherefore Clause annexed hereto as Exhibit "B". 6. Third-Party Defendants (NYC) Kings County Collection Unit and Yonatan Levoritz and Victor Katkalov separately filed motions to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint on several grounds, including that the pleading was not proper under CPLR 1007. Third-Party Plaintiff opposed the motions. 7. On April 23, 2014, all parties appeared before the Civil Court (Dear, J.) for a trial and motion conference. On the record, Plaintiff New Century Financial Services Inc. agreed to discontinue the original action without prejudice. Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky withdrew his counterclaims against New Century but refused to withdraw his third-party complaint against the third-party defendants. The Civil Court provided Third-Party Defendants Support Magistrate Fasone and Elena Svenson until Monday, April 28, 2014 to serve a motion to dismiss; Krichevsky must serve opposition papers on or before May 12, 2014; and any reply papers are due to be served on or before May 19th, 2014. 3 8. As detailed in the accompanying memorandum of law, the complaint should be dismissed as to Support Magistrate Fasone on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action, including third-party joinder, as to the State and its employees because this action is not brought in the Court of Claims; the Civil Court does not have jurisdiction (a) concerning Family Court matters, including the review of decisions and orders, any judge or support magistrate of the Family Court of the State of New York, Kings County and (b) claims exceeding $25,000; Support Magistrate Fasone is entitled to absolute judicial and quasi-judicial immunity; and the Third-Party Complaint is not a proper pleading under'CPLR . 1007. WHEREFORE, for all the foregoing reasons the deponent respectfully requests that the Court grant an order and judgment dismissing the Third-party Complaint in its entirety and granting judgment on behalf of Support Magistrate Fasone and against the plaintiff in this action and for such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. CHARLES F. SANDERS Sworn to before me this 2^, Michael $iudzi\ Assistant Attorney General of the State of New York