Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL SANDERS' AFFIDAVIT FOR MTD

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL SANDERS' AFFIDAVIT FOR MTD

Ratings: (0)|Views: 39|Likes:
Published by SLAVEFATHER
PEOPLE, IT IS OFFICIAL - FROM OFFICE OF NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL - JUDGES ARE ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE FOR INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL ACTS AND TORTS AGAINST CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. SLAVERY AND TYRANNY IS BACK!
PEOPLE, IT IS OFFICIAL - FROM OFFICE OF NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL - JUDGES ARE ABSOLUTELY IMMUNE FOR INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL ACTS AND TORTS AGAINST CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. SLAVERY AND TYRANNY IS BACK!

More info:

Published by: SLAVEFATHER on May 18, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/01/2014

pdf

text

original

 
CIVIL
 COURT
 OF THE
 STATE
 OF NEW
 YORKCOUNTY OF KINGS: PART
 11C/35CNEW
 CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
-against-MICHAEL
 KRICHEVSKY
Defendant.
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,
-X
Third Party
 Plaintiff,
-against-
JOHN
 FASONE
YONATAN
 LEVORITZ
VICTORKATKALOV, KINGS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORTCOLLECTION UNIT, ELENA SVENSON,Defendants.STATE OF NEW
 YORK)
' ' : SS.:COUNTY
 OF
 NEW YORK)Index No. 056717/13
 X AFFIDAVIT
 IN
 SUPPORT
 O
MOTION
 TO DISMISS THETHIRD PARTY COMPLAINT
 
(Dear,
 J.
-X
CHARLES F. SANDERS, being duly sworn, deposes and
 says:
1.'
 I am an Assistant Attorney General in the
 Office
 of the Attorney General of the Stateof
 New
 York, attorney
 for
 defendant John
 Fasone a
 support
 magistrate of the
 Family Court
 of
the State of New York, Kings County ( Family Court )-
 This
 affidavit
 is submitted in support ofhis motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the Court does not have subject matterjurisdiction, any judge or support magistrate of the Family Court of the State of New York,Kings County is entitled to absolute judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, and the Third-PartyComplaint
 is not a
 proper
 pleading
 under CPLR
 §
 1007.
 
Prior
 Judicial
 Proceedings
 In
 Family
 Court,
 Kings
 County
2. On
 November
 3
2008, Elena
 Svenson
 filed
 a
 petition
 in the
 Family
 Court,
 Kings
County
 seeking financial child support
 from
 Third-Party Plaintiff
 Krichevsky
 for
 their child.3. After various submissions by the respective parties indicating their respective
financial
 circumstances
 and
 proceedings held
 before
 Support. Magistrate Fasone,
 by
 Order
 of
Support and Findings of Facts, both dated February 3, 2010, the Family Court (Fasone, SupportMagistrate) determined and directed that Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky is to pay
 $2,045.00
monthly toward the support of the child at issue, and set the amount of support arrears as
$31,599.42,
 from
 the date of the filing of the support petition with the Family Court. See April 2,2012 Family Court Decision and Order and February 3, 2010 Family
 Court
 Final Order ofSupport collectively annexed hereto
 as
 Exhibit
 A .
4.
 After
 the filing of various objections by Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky seeking areduction and modification of the Final Order, by Decision and Order, dated April 2, 2012, theFamily Court (Hepner, J.) denied the objections and further
 found
 that Family Court Act § 439empowers support magistrates to
 hear,
 determine and grant any relief within the powers of of
the
 court, including
 to
 determine
 findings of
 fact
 and a final
 order.
 See
 Exhibit A : April
 2,
2012 Family Court Decision and Order, p. 6.
Present
 Action5. By Third-Party Complaint, dated January 27, 2014, Third Party Plaintiff
 Michael
Krichevsky, acting pro se, brings
 this
 third-party action against the third-party defendants,including John Fasone, a support magistrate of the Family Court of the State of New York,
 Kings
'
 County
 ( Family
 Court ) claiming
 that
 the
 Third-Party Defendants
 are
 liable
 to him for the
 sums
due in the
 original
 debt
 collection action brought against
 him by
 Plaintiff
 New
 Century Financial
 2
 
Services,
 Inc.
 for charges he
 incurred using
 a
 credit
 card.
 See
 Third-Party
 Complaint.
 The
 Third-Party Complaint
 further
 states various contract
 and
 tort
 claims against
 the
 Third-PartyDefendants, including
 tortious
 interference with Citibank contract
 (Count
 1);
 tortious
interference with contract (Leon Constraction [sic])(Count
 II) ;
 aid
 .and
 abet tortiousinterference with contracts (Count
 III) ;
 aid and abet
 fiduciary
 duty (Count IV); and extortion,
harassment,
 and
 concerted actions (Count VI).
 See
 Third-Party Complaint,
 fflf
 27-181'.
 Third-
Party Plaintiff Krichevsky seeks
 a
 monetary judgment
 for
 compensatory, punitive
 and
 treble
damages
 for an
 unspecified amount,
 and a
 declaratory judgment
 by the
 Civil Court that
 he was
denied
 his
 constitutional rights
 in
 custody proceedings before
 the
 Family Court.
 See
 Third-Party
Complaint, Wherefore Clause annexed hereto
 as
 Exhibit
 B .
6. Third-Party Defendants (NYC) Kings County Collection Unit and Yonatan
 Levoritz
and Victor
 Katkalov
 separately
 filed
 motions
 to
 dismiss
 the
 Third-Party Complaint on
 several
grounds, including that
 the
 pleading
 was not
 proper under CPLR
 §
 1007. Third-Party Plaintiff
opposed the
 motions.
7. On
 April
 23,
 2014, all parties appeared before
 the
 Civil Court (Dear,
 J.) for a
 trial
 and
motion conference.
 On the
 record, Plaintiff
 New
 Century Financial Services Inc. agreed
 to
discontinue
 the
 original action without prejudice. Third-Party Plaintiff Krichevsky
 withdrew
 his
counterclaims against
 New
 Century
 but
 refused
 to
 withdraw
 his
 third-party complaint
 against
 the
third-party defendants.
 The
 Civil Court provided Third-Party Defendants Support
 Magistrate
Fasone
 and
 Elena
 Svenson
 until Monday, April
 28,
 2014
 to
 serve
 a
 motion
 to
 dismiss;
Krichevsky must serve opposition papers
 on or
 before
 May 12,
 2014;
 and any
 reply papers
 are
due to be served on or
 before
 May 19th, 2014.
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->