Lowers costs of producing content (data, facts, opinions)Journalists compete with academics, non-profits, citizensNewspapers compete with TV, radio, blogsOpens the market for supply of contentTechnology and transformationReduces the advantage to large marketsMore content satisfying minority tastesTechnology and welfareGeographic rather than viewpoint differentiationInternational comparisonsDistribution cost limits geographic range of newspapersZero distribution cost enlarges marketsLess geographic more viewpoint differentiation"Superstar" market for journalismTechnology and transformationMore people reading better stuff Fewer writers making more moneyTechnology and welfareDistribution costs and market integrationLow pay, lots of journalists, low risk of failureFew and costly links between writers and readers meant writers worked for newspapersEnables direct connections between writer sand readersMarket for "superstars" with high risk, high rewardReaders not papers make the superstars (Bruni/Pogue)Content type determines vertical integrationTechnology and transformationHigher returns to return to content producersTechnology and welfareVertical integration and the freelance modelNewspapers long earned monopoly rents from adsIncentives to produce content preferred by elitesAdvertisers value access to targeted consumersConsumer value of "bundled" content grows as sources proliferate, so does advertiser value for targeted readersNew entrants (Huffington, Drudge) are good at bundling and targeting, drive down priceDistinguishing bundling value from content value central to new business modelsTechnology and transformationTargeting with news is costly--cheaper ways to sell a watchDemocratization of advertiser financeTechnology and welfareAdvertising and two sided marketsConsumers, producers, votersPotential for exposure disciplines politiciansWhat you read affects what you doShift from local to national media = shift from local to national externalities (Localism vs Globalism)Shift to integrated markets reduces probability but raises consequences of corruption (NJ Rabbis)Technology and transformationCosts and benefits of attention shiftsTechnology and welfareInformation externalitiesFox newspaper?Declining readership for local content, even when freeFewer papers, more viewpoint differentiationEspecially for analysis, commentary, and expertiseMarket for superstarsExpanding freelance market for journalismSummary of trends and predictionsIf there is a breakdown between geography and media, then democracy suffers as a consequencesGeography matters -democracy organized geographicallyPeople need access to
information
, not just newsLocal media needs to make information available to populace for them to make own decisionsAccess -to broadband, skills, tools to be effective prodcures/consumers/interpreters of news/informationCivic engagementThree conversations that need to uniteReport: "Informing Communities, Sustaining Democracy in the Digital Age"Only 1400+ papers for 3000+ counties in countryDon't need saving, need creatingToo many externalitiesThere will never be enough revenues to support the quantity of local news organizations that are socially optimumQuestions "preserving" of local journalismAntagonistic cultural against intellectual authority, which was foundation of 20th century journalism modelCultural problemPeter Shane (Executive Director, Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities)Possible Solutions
Yale Law Journalism Conference Page 2
Add a Comment