Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
University Of DyalaCollege of Physical Education
Changes In The Electromyography Of SomeWorking Muscle Groups In WeightliftersDuring The Performance of Snatch
 A Thesis Submitted to the council of the College of Physical Education / University of Dyala as partial requirements for the Master degree in Physical Education
 By Safaa A. Ismail  Advisors Asst. Prof. Dr. Ali Sheboot Dr.Maher A. Arif 
 
2009
INTRUDECTION:The main goal of the weightlifting game is to lift heaviest weight include the rules of thegame. Beforehand many of researches and studies are compile in deferent scientificdomain to serve the level of the W.L. sport. While the Electromyography of the skeletalmuscles during the performance of the Olympic lift we have not get any database in thatfield , and for that reason we put this study .Many of local researchers go into summarizedside of the skeletal muscle Electromyography (EMG) and it considered as an assistanceindicator with many other physiologic indicators to reach the results . All of these studiesdepend on the electrical cable connecting (direct connection), Therefore of them depend onthe isometric contraction and limited movement with out doing the lift.METHODS:Four weightlifter of the national team for senior (Two categories -56,105kg.- include twolifters in each one).Depended the first and the second class in each category thereforecasting higher level of the performance . The study was restricted on the Snatch pull only.The best doing of three attempted it will adipoted for measurement. The instrument thatdepending to measure the (EMG) signal by the skin (sEMG) (myoprate 400 from noraxoncompany) ACS (American collage sportmedicine), It work by record the (EMG) signal byBluetooth technology (sending part-receiving part) connect to the laptop. Surfaceelectrodes that sticking on the middle-center of the muscle. Five group muscles arechosen ;Gastrogenimus,Rectus femorsi, lumbar dosal,Trapezus and Deltoid. The pull (lift)divided to seven phases ; start position (SP),first pull(FP),knee movement(KM),second pull(SP),fall with out lean(FWL),fall with lean(FL) and hold and stability(HS).After recording the results it treating with suitable statistical ways ;Parametric (mean,standereddivision and mode) , Nonparametric (Man witny steps for mini samples) at (p=0.05).(EMG) signal recorded from release the bar from the ground till hold it above of head by both hands.
 
RESULTS:There is clear differences in the activity of (EMG) signal level during the stages of thelift. Gast.m. activate in primary stages (SP,FP), Rectus femorsi for the heavy weight (HW)it activate in (SP) and for the light weight (LW) in the finale stage (HS) . Lumbardosalwhole activation was in the middle stages. Trapezius maximum activity in the final stage because of the nature of its work. Deltoid total activate in the (FWL),(FL) stage of the lift.The second axon of the study was compared between (HW) and (LW) in (EMG) signalactivity level, in (SP) is to (HW) , in (FP) is to (LW) , Rectus femorsi in all stages for (LW) unless in (SP) , Trapezius for (LW) , in (KM) and (SP)stage , Deltoid its significantfor (HW) in (SP).
Rectus femorsi M. during stages Gastrgenemus M. during stages
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • Notes
    Load more