Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Smell Only Noticeable to Strangers of the Kennel

The Smell Only Noticeable to Strangers of the Kennel

Ratings: (0)|Views: 14|Likes:
Published by Frank Gallagher
De jure De facto
De jure De facto

More info:

Published by: Frank Gallagher on May 27, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





The smell only noticeable to strangers of the kennel
De jure De facto
Facts must have root 2 take root God Coherency "Catch 22" must have semblance 2 catch doG chase tail Would a Judiciary selected by the government  be considered INDEPENDENT so as to meet the purpose of the Charter to protect the people FROM the  policies and actions of all levels of government? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1982 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a  bill of rights.  The Charter is intended to  protect certain political and civil rights of people in Canada 
the policies and actions of all levels of government. It is also supposed to unify Canadians around a set of principles that embody those rights.[3][4]  The Charter was preceded by the Canadian Bill of Rights, which was introduced by the government of  John Diefenbaker  in 1960. However, the Bill of Rights was only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document. Therefore, it was limited in scope and was easily amendable. This motivated some within government to improve rights protections in Canada. The movement for  human rights and freedoms that emerged after  World War II also wanted to entrench the  principles enunciated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[5]  Hence, the government of  Prime Minister  Pierre Trudeau enacted the Charter in 1982.
Independent Judiciary
 Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c))
 A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the  province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the  judiciary.
Given the fundamental importance of 
the independence of the judiciary,
 the responsibility for courts administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue.
Great care and respect for the
  principles of judicial independence must be exercised in this area.
In 1959, an international gathering of over 185 judges, lawyers, and law professors from 53 countries, meeting in
and speaking as the 
, made a declaration as to the fundamental principle of the rule of law. This was the 
. They declared that the rule of law implies certain rights and freedoms,
that it implies an independent judiciary,
and that it implies social, economic and cultural conditions conducive to human dignity.
The Declaration of Delhi did not, however, suggest that the rule of law requires legislative power to be subject to  judicial review.[39]
? Stated or Implied eh?
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Pro Conduct 103) Interpretation (f) rules of professional conduct
cannot address every situation
, and a lawyer should observe
the rules in the spirit
 as well as in
the letter. Supremacy of God and the Rule Of Law!!
Rule of Law
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with,  publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process. The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy. According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include
a clear separation of powers,
legal certainty,
the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become
 thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use" GO POE General Over-use Proclamations Only Elusivity
 publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency,
of no force or effect
[edit] United Nations
 defines the rule of law as:[40]
a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private,
including the State itself,
are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated,
equally enforced and
independently adjudicated,
and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards.
It requires, as well, measures to ensure adherence to the principles of supremacy of law, equality before the law, accountability to the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers,
participation in decision-making,
legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural and legal transparency.
The ancient concept of
rule of law
 can be distinguished from
rule by law,
according to political science professor Li Shuguang: "The difference....is that, under the rule of law, the law is preeminent and
can serve as a check against
 the abuse of power. Under rule by law,
the law is a mere tool for a government,
 that suppresses in a legalistic fashion."[25] 
Renewed interests?
 The General Assembly has considered rule of law as an agenda item since 1992, with renewed interest since

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->