Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
26764 State v Berget Briefs

26764 State v Berget Briefs

Ratings: (0)|Views: 9|Likes:
Published by ArgusJHult
Briefs for the May 27, 2014 South Dakota Supreme Court hearing in the matter of State vs. Rodney Berget.
Briefs for the May 27, 2014 South Dakota Supreme Court hearing in the matter of State vs. Rodney Berget.

More info:

Published by: ArgusJHult on May 27, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/27/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
APPELLANT’S BRIEF  ____________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA  ____________ No. 26764  ____________ STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RODNEY SCOTT BERGET, Defendant and Appellant.  ___________ APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MINNEHAHA COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA  ____________ HONORABLE BRADLEY G. ZELL CIRCUIT JUDGE  ____________ JEFF LARSON 400 North Main Avenue, #207 Sioux Falls, SD 57104 Telephone: (605) 275-4529 CHERI SCHARFFENBERG Olson, Waltner, & Scharffenberg 801 East Ryan Drive, #B Tea, SD 57064 Telephone: (605) 498-0120 Attorneys for Appellant
 
 
 ____________ MARTY JACKLEY Attorney General PAUL SWEDLUND Assistant Attorney General 1302 East Hwy 14, Suite 1 Pierre, SD 57501-5070 Attorneys for Appellee Notice of Appeal Filed July 18, 2013.
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 PAGE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES i PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT 2 STATEMENT OF ISSUES 4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE 5 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS 6 ARGUMENT 7
I.
 
 WHETHER APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRESENT NEW  MITIGATION EVIDENCE UPON RE-SENTENCING.
7
 II.
 
 WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING APPELLANT WITHOUT APPELLANT’S PRESENCE IN THE COURTROOM AND WITHOUT  AFFORDING APPELLANT HIS RIGHT OF  ALLOCUTION.
14
 III.
 
 WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT RECUSING ITSELF PRIOR TO RE-SENTENCING.
19
 
CONCLUSION 21 REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT 22 APPENDIX

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->