Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Anti Terrorist on Dealing With the Police

The Anti Terrorist on Dealing With the Police

Ratings: (0)|Views: 57|Likes:
Published by innocentbystander
Downloaded from http://www.theantiterrorist.co.uk/transcripts.php
Downloaded from http://www.theantiterrorist.co.uk/transcripts.php

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: innocentbystander on Nov 17, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





heAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press would like to take this opportunity to point out that in theselitigious times it's easy to lose sight of the fact that we—as a community of kindred souls—oncevalued common sense. So cast back in your memory to that long-forgotten concept and embrace theact that the TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press stand above all for freedom and personalresponsibility. Simply stated, how you apply this information in your own life has nothing to do withus. These transcripts are for education and entertainment purposes only.
TheAntiTerrorist on Dealing With The Police
Broadcast on 22 November 2007Hello friends, I am TheAntiTerrorist. Thank you once again for all your messages of support,your emails and for being part of the conversation.Now, I do have a number of concerns about how the information I give you in this broadcastis going to be used. I don’t want to enable criminals in our society to thwart justice, but I amcommitted to protecting the innocent from what appears to be an explosion of police abuse,and in a case like this I choose to protect the people. I want to make it perfectly clear I amnot giving legal advice—I’m not a lawyer—so saying “TheAntiTerrorist told me to do it,” isnot going to cut you any slack with the police, but I can give you my personal opinion, and Icould say what I would do or what other people have done in the past. If more people wereto understand and exercise their rights at the appropriate times, we would be a whole lotmore successful at reining in the tyranny that we are all complaining about right now.Knowing your rights. Knowing what to say and who to say it to, and what not to say andwho not to say it to.You see, the police use tactics—they capitalise on the fact that very few of us know ourrights because we were never taught them in the public-indoctrination school system.Anything you know about your rights you either read in the papers, or you heard from yourfriends or your uncle or your parents, but you certainly weren’t told about your rights inschool.Generally speaking, the average person in this country and in the United States is aconstitutional illiterate who has no idea what his or her rights are, but they are constantlycomplaining about ‘losing their rights.’ Your rights are lost not because someone took themfrom you, but because you are unable to claim them—you don’t know what the right is andyou don’t know how to claim it.The police now are trained to get the evidence from you—not by force, although thathappens from time to time—but rather to do it subtly, to trick you. They cunningly coerceyou into waiving your rights because of your ignorance,Don’t blame the policeman for violating your rights. At some point in time you’ve got to say,
“Hey, Mr Policeman, you’re violating my rights.” It’s up to you to tell him. It’s an adversarialposition—the policeman against you. He’s not your friend. If you think he’s your friend youhave your head up your backside.Now let’s be clear—’adversary’ does not necessarily mean ‘enemy.’ I’m talking about‘adversary’ in the sense of playing chess with someone, someone who wants to win in asituation. They need to win to get their detection rate up, especially in the British police—it’sall based on detection, it’s how many detections they get in a day. They are not your enemy,they are your adversary.It’s not supposed to be that way, and it wasn’t always that way. Back in the day, thepoliceman was our friend in a judicial system, a justice system. Today, we have a monetarysystem, not a judicial system, it’s money. It’s an adversarial system and the policeman’s job isto get the goods on you and convict you so that they can fine you and make money. He’s arevenue agent, nothing more, nothing less. He’s there to protect the claims window of theinsurance industry, that’s why he insists you wear your seatbelt and you have it fastened.Whether or not you wear a seatbelt doesn’t make a rat’s backside difference to me or you oranyone else, but it does to the insurance industry, and the policeman is out there to protectthe insurance industry, he’s not there to protect you. He doesn’t care whether you wear yourseatbelt or not.Now if you’re a policeman, you know you are a revenue agent. That’s your job. To generaterevenue. And you also know that if you don’t generate revenue your boss is going to beasking you about that. “The average number of tickets we write in this department is two ashift and you’re only writing 1.7. John. Now what the hell’s going on here? Tom over there,he’s averaging three tickets per shift...”Now the police, they vehemently deny it but they’ve got a quota system.‘Scuse me Mr Officer, let’s be intelligent people over here. Mr Policeman, try writing notickets whatsoever for thirty days and see what happens to your job. For the next thirty days,every time you catch someone speeding, try giving them a warning. Instead of giving a guya ticket for drunk driving, give him a ride home—try that for thirty days and find out whathappens to your job and tell me there’s no quota system, officer.The biggest complaint that we should have and the biggest complaint that the police actuallydo make themselves because they do understand what’s going on is that they are being usedas revenue collection agents instead of doing their job and protecting us from the bad guys of this world. They’re out there to collect money. They know it and they don’t particularly likeit very much.As I said in my last police video, they are mostly good people, and they do understandwhat’s going on. We all pay our taxes and the taxes are used to support the policedepartment, and we should not be depending on 5 million in fines here and there to balance
out the city or county budget. And if we stopped doing that we would find the police would be more helpful and less adversarial. With this adversarial monetary system the policehaven’t got time to deal with murderers, thieves and rapists, because they’re too busydealing with seatbelts and traffic signs and drivers licenses, registration, proof of insurance—the victimless crimes that don’t amount to anything whatsoever, that don’t have anything todo with protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public.This is big business and parking tickets and speeding tickets and police on the roadsenforcing the traffic laws—in some communities it’s the difference between bankruptcy andsolvency. What we have here is a public that’s irresponsible and a police force that’s almostequally irresponsible—dedicated, sincere, but definitely irresponsible.So how much does your government know about you and how much do you want yourgovernment to know about you? The government doesn’t have some agent following youaround with a clipboard taking down all the information about you—they don’t do that. Noone knows anything about you that you have not revealed by your own mouth or your ownhand. All of the evidence that’s ever going to be used against you will be furnished by you.The government seems to know just about everything about you—they want to know more.They want to go through your luggage, they want to go through your pockets, they wantyou to take your shoes off at the airport—these are called security steps to make you safe andif you want to exercise your rights then you have to keep your mouth shut. That’s it.There’s a golden rule when dealing with the police: keep your mouth shut, don’t sayanything, shut up. If you say nothing, nothing will be used against you. If you saysomething, something will be used against you. If you say a lot, a lot will be used againstyou.The more you talk, the more that have to use against you.And they tell you that very plainly. I mean, you have to be seriously mentally retarded to sitthere and talk to a guy who says to you, he looks you right in the eyeballs and says, “ youhave the right to remain silent and anything you say can and will be taken down and usedagainst you. Now, where were you going? where were you coming from? What’s yourname, address, telephone number, social security number? Are you married? How manykids have you got? Where do you have sex with your wife?”You’ve got to be absolutely crazy [to talk to] a guy who tells you, ‘Anything you say can andwill be used against you in a court of law.’ But we just go right ahead and try and talk ourway out of it, and all we are doing is digging a hole for ourselves that we can never get outof.Now, do you have to talk? Do you have to answer questions? For anyone, whether they are agovernment official or just an ordinary guy in the street? It may very well be that the policeare required by law to ask you certain questions and the reverse question is, are you required

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->