Rivernider - 22 - Plaintiffs Response to 3rd Order to Show Cause (11/16/2009)

Case 9:09-cv-81255-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2009 Page 1 of 30

Marsha

G.RiverniderRobertH.Rivernider9426Delmar

Court

Wellington,Florida33414AndCharles

Edward

Lincoln,

III

c/oPeytonYatesFreiman603ElmwoodPlace,Suite#6Austin,Texas78705

Or

c/oKathyAnnGarcia-Lawson2620Nature'sWayPalmBeachGardens,Florida33410Telephone:512-968-2500/512-923-1889Facsimile:561-691-1423

Plaintiffs

inpropiapersona,

pro

se

FILED

b y ~ ~ _ D . C .

NOV

16

2009

STEVENM.

LARIMORE

CLERK

U.S.

DIST.

CT.

S.D.

OF

FLA.

-W.RB.

UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURTSOUTHERNDISTRICT

OF

FLORIDA---PALMBEACH

v.

MARSHAG.RIVERNIDER,ROBERTH.RIVERNIDER,CHARLESEDWARDLINCOLN,III,Plaintiffs,U.S.BANKNATIONALASSOCIATION,AS

TRUSTEE

FOR

THE

C-BASSMORTGAGELOANASSET-BACKEDCERTIFICATES,SERIES2006-CBS,Andall

JOHN

&

JANE

DOESI-50Defendants.

§

§§§

§§

§§§

§§

§

§§

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

CaseNo.09-91255-CIVHON.W.P.DIMITROULEAS

PLAINTIFFS'NOTICE

OF

FILINGAFFIDAVITSINRESPONSE

TO

JUDGEDIMITROULEAS'THIRDORDER

TOSHOW

CAUSEFILEDNOVEMBER13,2009PLAINTIFFS'NOTICE

OF

FILINGAFFIDAVITSINRESPONSE

TO

3

rd

OSC

PlaintiffsbelievethattheirNovember

13,2009,

Responsetothis

Court's

SecondOrdertoShowCausesufficientlysupportstheirComplaintthatthisCourtshouldnotdismissit.Plaintiffshadalsoresponded

in

brieftothescurrilousaccusations

of

Dr.OrlyTaitz,Esquire,submittedbyletterinformallytotheCourt.PlaintiffshadindeedservedtheirNovember12,2009,responseonDr.OrlyTaitz,Esquire,

in

anyevent(bothdirectlyandbyandthroughher

Marsha

G.

Rivernider,RobertH.Rivernider,CharlesEdwardLincoln,

III

v.

U.S.

Bank,

N

A.,

CombinedResponse

to

SecondOrdertoShowCauseFiled]]-02-09

and

Motionto

1

Dismissedjiled9-24-09,withreservation

of

Plaintiffs'RightstoFileMotion

to

Convert12(b)(6)toRule

56MSJ

Case 9:09-cv-81255-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2009 Page 2 of 30

attorneyJonathanH.Levy,withwhomCharlesEdwardLincolnhadattemptedtoconsultandreachsomesort

of

resolutionpriortofilinganything).Basically,Plaintiffsdenyunequivocallythattheyhavesubmittedanyfraudulentdocuments

or

submittedanydocumentswhichtheyhadanyreasontobelieve

might

havebeenfraudulentnor

in

anywayfalsifiedtothisCourt,includingthedocumentsreferredtobyDr.Taitz.

If

thisCourtisinclinedtobelievethatthe

"water

hasbeensullied"byDr.

Taitz'

accusationstothepointthatthisCourtcannolongerlookdispassionatelyandobjectively

at

thePlaintiffs'challengetoUS

Bank's

mortgagefraudinthiscasebecause

of

thetawdrystate

of

affairsbetweenone

of

thePlaintiffsandthePlaintiffs'"attemptedattorney",thenPlaintiffsmoveandrequestthatthisCourtrecuseitselfratherthanenteranyfurtherordersrulingsinthiscase

at

all.Plaintiffs

do

notwishtoendorse

or

condonetheinterjection

of

factsconcerningmaritalinfidelity

or

romanticvengeanceasrelevantfactorsintheevaluation

of

mortgagefraud

or

thevalidity

of

commercialpaperassignments

or

of

theassignment

of

civilcauses

of

action,buttheyknow

of

noothermeans

of

effectivelyexplainingDr.

Taitz'

bizarrebehavior.

WHEREFORE,

Plaintiffsincorporatebyreference,andrestateas

if

fullyattachedandrecopiedhereinbelow,all

of

theallegationscontainedintheirComplaint,Application

for

TemporaryRestraining

Order,

andtheirNovember12,

2009,

Responsetothe

Defendants'

MotiontoDismissandthe

Court's

Second

Order

toShowCause,butinaddition,Plaintiffs'attachtheFollowingAffidavitsinResponsetothis

Court's

Third

Order

toShowCauseenteredwithinasinglemonth:

(I)

Affidavit

of

PlaintiffCharlesEdwardLincoln,III.(2)Affidavit

of

PsychologistDr.KathyAnnGarcia-Lawson,Ph.D.(3)Affidavit

of

PlaintiffMarshaG.Rivernider.(4)Affidavit

of

PlaintiffRobertH.Rivernider.

PRAYERFORRELIEF

Marsha

G.

Rivernider,RobertH.Rivernider,CharlesEdwardLincoln,

III

v.

u.s.

Bank,NA.,

CombinedResponse

to

SecondOrdertoShowCauseFiled

11-02-09

and

Motiont0

2

Dismissedjiled

9-24-09,

withreservation

of

Plaintiffs'Rights

to

FileMotiontoConvert12(b)(6)

to

Rule

56MSJ

Case 9:09-cv-81255-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2009 Page 3 of 30

PlaintiffsMARSHA

G.

RIVERNIDER,ROBERTH.RIVERNIDER,andCHARLESEDWARDLINCOLN,III,praythattheCourtaccepttheseaffidavitsasafullandsufficientResponsetoitsThirdOrdertoShowCauseenteredonFriday,November

13,2009,

andthattheCourtwilldenyDefendant'sMotiontoDismisspursuanttoRuleI2(b)(6),OrdertheDefendantU.S.Banktofileananswerwithin

10

days,initiatediscovery,andtosetaschedulingorderandfinaldatefortrial.PlaintiffsalsopraythattheCourtwillallowthemtofiletheirFirstAmendedComplaintonorbeforeDecember

15,2009,

andthatDefendantsalsobecompelledtoanswersaidamendedcomplaintalso.Plaintiffsfurtherpraythatuponfinaltrial-by-jury,thatCourtwillenter

judgment

forPlaintiffsagainstalldefendantsforthereliefrequestedabove,includingbutnotlimitedtodeclaratoryjudgmentregardingtherightsandstatus

of

eachpartyinrelationtothepropertyat9246DelemarCourt,Wellington,Florida33414,andtheinterestsassignedtoPlaintiffinsuchpropertyandthenotes,transactions,andoccurrencesrelatingtothesame.PlaintiffspledgethattheywillnevermentionDr.OrlyTaitz

in

thislitigationagain

if