I. Prefatory Statement – Overview of Case for 9th Circuit Appeal - Dkt 37 - Consolidated Reply Brief

Embed Doc
Copy Link
Readcast
Collections

CommentGo Back

Download

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APPELLANT\u2019S CONSOLIDATED REPLY BRIEF
IN RESPONSE TO APPELLEES\u2019 TWO ANSWERING BRIEFS
AND SUPPLEMENTAL EXCERPT OF RECORD

RICHARD I. FINE
Prisoner ID # 1824367
c/o Men\u2019s Central Jail
441 Bauchet Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Pro Se

RICHARD I. FINE,

Appellant and Petitioner,

vs.

SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY, et al,

Appellees and Respondents

Case No. 09-56073

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01914 JFW (CW)

-ii-

123456789

10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.

Prefatory Statement \u2013 Overview of Case.......................................................................... 1 A. \u201cDue Process v. Corruption\u201d.......................................................................................1 B. The Criminal LA County Payments and Their Effect................................................5 C. The Corrupt Judges Will Stop At Nothing to Destroy Fine......................................10 D. Action Requested......................................................................................................14

II.

Neither Respondent Sheriff Nor the LA Superior Court and Judge Yaffe are Parties to

this Appeal........................................................................................................................17

III. Respondent Sheriff\u2019s Answering Brief is Frivolous and Filed to Harass and Oppress

Appellant..........................................................................................................................19

IV. The Answering Brief of the LA Superior Court and Judge Yaffe is Frivolous, Makes
False Statements, Deliberately Misleads the Court and is Filed to Harass and Oppress
Appellant..........................................................................................................................14

V.

Fraudulent Statements in Answering Briefs...................................................................21

VI. Incontrovertible and Uncontested Facts.........................................................................34

VII. Argument........................................................................................................................43 A. Judge Yaffe\u2019s Criminal Activities Mandate Recusal...............................................43 B. The 27% of State Salary Payment by LA County Mandates Recusal......................44 C. Judge Yaffe Must Recuse Himself Because He Is Judging His Own Act of

Charging Fine With a Crime and His Own Act of Ordering Fine to Pay Money to

LA County While He was Taking Payments From LA County...............................47 D. Judge Yaffe Was Embroiled.....................................................................................49 E. The LA Superior Court Brief\u2019s Disqualification Argument Is A Sham...................50

VIII. Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 52

IX. Certificate of Compliance............................................................................................. End

-iii-

123456789

10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27

28

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Precedent Erreur ! Aucune entr\u00e9e de table de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences trouv\u00e9e.

Underlying Erreur ! Aucune entr\u00e9e de table de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences trouv\u00e9e.Erreur !

Aucune entr\u00e9e de table de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences trouv\u00e9e.Erreur ! Aucune entr\u00e9e de
table de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences trouv\u00e9e.Erreur ! Aucune entr\u00e9e de table de
r\u00e9f\u00e9rences trouv\u00e9e.

Erreur ! Aucune entr\u00e9e de table de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences trouv\u00e9e.

of 00

Leave a Comment