"False hopes and temporary devices ...": Organizing Food Supply in the Continental Army
1. "To subsist an Army well ...": An Organizational Overview
2. "Owing to this variety of waste ...": Producing, Storing, and Transporting Bread
3. "We now have 500 head of fat cattle ...": Procuring, Transporting, and Processing Livestock
Successful commanders have always recognized the importance of food supply; former bookseller and amateur military scholar Major General Henry Knox, then chief of Continental Army artillery, wrote on the matter after six years hard-won experience in the war with Great Britain:
"To subsist an Army well, requires the utmost attention and exertion. Unless an Army is properly fed, all calculations and schemes of enterprize are in vain. For the moment an expedition is to take place, the troops may be said to have wanted provisions for one, two, or more days, and that it will be impossible to begin a march until they shall be supplied. Experience has often convinced us of the truth of this assertion, and some times at too dear a rate."1
Soldiers often purchased, begged, or stole foodstuff, but it was the army-supplied ration that served as the mainstay of their daily sustenance. Before the advent of the general staff in the early 19th century (somewhat akin to a presidential cabinet) much of the routine that kept a military force in being necessarily devolved upon the commander and a small group of aides. To disperse this workload several posts were created to keep the army running, among them the Commissary and Quartermaster Generals. Under these two men, each with food-related responsibilities, was a network of assistants operating in various communities, and the butchers, coopers, wagoners, drovers, and other personnel needed to process and transport provisions.
Successful commanders have always recognized the importance of food supply; former bookseller and amateur military scholar Major General Henry Knox, then chief of Continental Army artillery, wrote on the matter after six years hard-won experience in the war with Great Britain:
"To subsist an Army well, requires the utmost attention and exertion. Unless an Army is properly fed, all calculations and schemes of enterprize are in vain. For the moment an expedition is to take place, the troops may be said to have wanted provisions for one, two, or more days, and that it will be impossible to begin a march until they shall be supplied. Experience has often convinced us of the truth of this assertion, and some times at too dear a rate."1
Soldiers often purchased, begged, or stole foodstuff, but it was the army-supplied ration that served as the mainstay of their daily sustenance. Before the advent of the general staff in the early 19th century (somewhat akin to a presidential cabinet) much of the routine that kept a military force in being necessarily devolved upon the commander and a small group of aides. To disperse this workload several posts were created to keep the army running, among them the Commissary and Quartermaster Generals. Under these two men, each with food-related responsibilities, was a network of assistants operating in various communities, and the butchers, coopers, wagoners, drovers, and other personnel needed to process and transport provisions.
"False hopes and temporary devices ...": Organizing Food Supply in the Continental Army
1. "To subsist an Army well ...": An Organizational Overview
2. "Owing to this variety of waste ...": Producing, Storing, and Transporting Bread
3. "We now have 500 head of fat cattle ...": Procuring, Transporting, and Processing Livestock
Successful commanders have always recognized the importance of food supply; former bookseller and amateur military scholar Major General Henry Knox, then chief of Continental Army artillery, wrote on the matter after six years hard-won experience in the war with Great Britain:
"To subsist an Army well, requires the utmost attention and exertion. Unless an Army is properly fed, all calculations and schemes of enterprize are in vain. For the moment an expedition is to take place, the troops may be said to have wanted provisions for one, two, or more days, and that it will be impossible to begin a march until they shall be supplied. Experience has often convinced us of the truth of this assertion, and some times at too dear a rate."1
Soldiers often purchased, begged, or stole foodstuff, but it was the army-supplied ration that served as the mainstay of their daily sustenance. Before the advent of the general staff in the early 19th century (somewhat akin to a presidential cabinet) much of the routine that kept a military force in being necessarily devolved upon the commander and a small group of aides. To disperse this workload several posts were created to keep the army running, among them the Commissary and Quartermaster Generals. Under these two men, each with food-related responsibilities, was a network of assistants operating in various communities, and the butchers, coopers, wagoners, drovers, and other personnel needed to process and transport provisions.
(Originally published in Food History News in vol. XII, nos. 3 and 4, and vol. XIII, no. 1)
Wagons used to transport provisions to the Continental Army were usually hired for the purpose from civilians near the source of supply. Large numbers of Conestoga wagons were used hauling in goods from Pennsylvania, while other vehicles conformed to types preferred in the area they came from. Most likely had some covering for their lading, either a bonnet cover (as pictured), or a close cover drawn directly over the cargo. Depending on the weight of the load, wagons were drawn by two or four horses. Illustration from William Tatham, Historical and Practical Essay of the Culitivation and Commerce of Tobacco (London, 1800). Tatham was present in the James River basin area of Virginia in the 1760s and 70s.
"To subsist an Army well ..." An Organizational Overview
Successful commanders have always recognized the importance of food supply; former bookseller and amateur military scholar Major General Henry Knox, then chief of Continental Army artillery, wrote on the matter after six years hard-won experience in the war with Great Britain:
To subsist an Army well, requires the utmost attention and exertion. Unless an Army is properly fed, all calculations and schemes of enterprize are in vain. For the moment an expedition is to take place, the troops may be said to have wanted provisions for one, two, or more days, and that it will be impossible to begin a march until they shall be supplied. Experience has often convinced us of the truth of this assertion, and some times at too dear a rate. 1
2 Soldiers often purchased, begged, or stole foodstuff, but it was the army-supplied ration that served as the mainstay of their daily sustenance. Before the advent of the general staff in the early 19th century (somewhat akin to a presidential cabinet) much of the routine that kept a military force in being necessarily devolved upon the commander and a small group of aides. To disperse this workload several posts were created to keep the army running, among them the Commissary and Quartermaster Generals. Under these two men, each with food-related responsibilities, was a network of assistants operating in various communities, and the butchers, coopers, wagoners, drovers, and other personnel needed to process and transport provisions. Varying amounts of beef, pork, fish, baked bread or flour, and rice, along with beverages and occasional vegetables, comprised the Continental soldier's daily ration. To actualize this allotment a system had to be instituted to purchase food from farmers and middlemen, collect it at designated magazines (i.e., storehouses), and transport it wherever the army and its detachments were situated. Once foodstuff reached the army it would be distributed to the divisional, brigade, and regimental* quartermasters responsible for issuing soldiers their rations. Keeping an army together required sound finances and the willingness of farmers and merchants to sell to the army; failing that, the high command needed the resolve to implement impressment (property seizure) at the risk of ill- feeling among local populations. Besides economic considerations a number of other factors influenced food supply, including the competence of the Quartermaster General, Commissary General, and their deputies, the weather's detrimental effects on harvests and/or road conditions, the proximity of the enemy, whether troops were mobile or located in static posts and the distance to the nearest magazine. At the war's beginning the Continental Army's infrastructure had to be manufactured from whole cloth and, like most of the fledgling army's components, the system of gathering and dispersing food found its basis in pre-war British practice. The new army's food chain was comprised of several departments and effected through various procedures that were periodically modified to cope with changing economic, political, or military conditions. At the outset, the Commissary General and his local deputies first purchased and collected comestibles, then procured wagons to carry food from outlying districts to the army or magazines. Until 1777 wagons were hired by the Quartermaster General or one of his assistants; eventually transport was arranged through the Wagonmaster General and his deputies, working under the auspices of the Quartermaster General's department. At a more elementary level, each infantry brigade and regiment was apportioned wagons to transport provisions and baggage; these wagons were furnished by the Wagon Department and driven by hired teamsters or soldiers selected for the task. When the time came for distributing rations within each regiment, each unit's quartermaster apportioned foodstuff to each company and then within a company to every six-man mess squad (a regiment contained eight to ten companies prior to 1779, each nominally comprised of seventy-six men; eight or nine companies of fifty-six men each beginning in 1779.
* * * * * * * * * * * * A division was comprised of two brigades and a brigade usually contained three or four regiments; regiments were always understrength, ranging from a high of roughly 500 men to a low of 150 or less.
3
Commissary assistant preparing food prior to issuing to company messes. (Captain David Browns Company of Concord Minutemen, 19-20 April 2014, Minuteman National Historic Park.)
Joseph Trumbull was appointed Commissary General for the Continental Army on 19 July 1775, the first of several men to fill that office. For the war's first two years the Commissary General was responsible for both procurement and disbursement of provisions. In 1777 the first major departmental reorganization occurred and those duties were split between the Commissary General of Purchases and the Commissary General of Issues. Trumbull headed the purchasing department while the other department was given Charles Stewart; beginning in 1779 changes were made in methods of food procurement, but the issuing office, headed by Stewart, operated relatively unchanged until late in 1781. The Commissary of Issues department "also included assistant commissaries of issue assigned to supervise provision magazines ... By the end of January 1778 Thomas Jones ... deputy commissary general of issues in the Middle Department, reported 13
4
Rations being issued to Massachusetts militia investing Boston in 1775. (Captain David Browns Company of Concord Minutemen, 19-20 April 2014, Minuteman National Historic Park.)
magazines in New Jersey, 10 in Pennsylvania, and 3 in Maryland, each under the care of an assistant commissary of issues, who appointed his own clerks and scalemen. At some magazines coopers as well as bakers were employed." 2 Historian Robert Wright described the impact of the 1777 changes: the Commissary General of Purchases "primarily procured items, while the [Commissary General of Issues] stored them and handled some distribution functions. The Quartermaster General's Department reorganized on 14 May. The department formed specialized groups to handle transportation, quarters, forage, and baking; upgrading the Army's transportation had the most immediate impact. The Quartermaster General remained directly responsible for the support of General Washington's Main Army; he had several assistants and a deputy for each division. Parallel structures were provided in each territorial
5 department." Another important innovation was the assignment to each brigade of an assistant commissary responsible for overseeing and expediting the ration issue. 3
The 1777 reorganization also covered some practical matters:
... the commissary general of purchases shall contract ... with one or more persons in each district, to make or supply a sufficient quantity of vinegar for the use of the army ... the deputy commissaries general of purchases take special care to procure full supplies of vegetables, as being essentially necessary to the health of the army; and they are ... directed, with the advice of the commander in chief, or commander of the respective district, to hire land therein, and raise such quantities of vegetables as are wanted, and cannot be otherwise procured for the army ... And whereas Experience has evinced that potatoes can be preserved in such a Manner as that the Crops of one Year will keep until that of the succeeding Year is fit for Use; the Com: General or the D.Com. Generals ... shall therefore fix upon one or more proper places in each Department on which to raise such Quantities of potatoes Turnips and other Vegetables as the Commander in Chief or Commander of a Department may Direct, to rent Land therefore and employ persons to superintend and carry on the Works with a sufficient Number of Labourers. 4
It is doubtful that this plan was ever put in effect. When considering food supply the Quartermaster General was just as important as the two Commissary Generals. While the latter handled purchase, storage, and disbursement of food, the former controlled the boats, vehicles, and draft animals (horses and oxen) used to transport provisions; if rations could not travel to the army, soldiers suffered. The Quartermaster General had other duties affecting food supply and planning; functioning as would a modern chief of staff the Quartermaster General helped plan troop movements, distributed the commanding general's orders, built and repaired roads and bridges, and surveyed fords and ferry sites. Army historian Erna Risch
6
Sheet-iron camp kettle and hatchet with issued foods, including beef, peas, rice and chocolate. (Photograph by the author.)
noted that considering all his responsibilities "the Quartermaster General had to be not only a competent military officer but also an able administrator and a versatile businessman, familiar with the resources of the country and capable of drawing them out." 5 Prominent Philadelphian Thomas Mifflin was the first man to fill that post in the Continental Army. He served until autumn 1777, with a brief hiatus in the summer of 1776. Mifflin's resignation in October 1777 contributed to the late-year food shortages which plagued Washington's army before and during the Valley Forge camp. In March 1778 General Nathanael Greene assumed the Quartermaster General position, serving in that capacity until his 1780 appointment as commander of the Southern Department. Greene's tenure set a tone of efficiency and competence ably mirrored by Colonel Timothy Pickering who filled the role from 1780 till the war's end. There were three stages of provisioning implemented during the war: purchase of foodstuffs directly from suppliers by the Commissary Department (the commissariat system), a system of
7 specific supplies provided by individual states, and, finally, a network of contractors hired to supply foodstuff to various districts or armies; to complicate matters further there were many variations within each method to deal with economic factors, transportation problems, and food shortages. A constant theme in extraordinary circumstances was impressment, the forceable seizure of commodities desperately needed to keep the army in being. To simplify matters we have dwelt on the first system; purchase, storage, and issuance of provisions by the Commissary Department, via the Commissary General's deputies and agents, and the important role of the Quartermaster General throughout, but a brief overview of the other methods is in order. The commissariat's successor, a system of state specific supplies, was instituted because of the army's chronic difficulties in obtaining sufficient foodstuff during the winter of 1779-80, brought on by a severe monetary crisis and exacerbated by bad weather. This ad hoc solution resulted in what amounted to a barter system, similar to that used by the country's businessmen and farmers in times of tight money supply. It was accomplished via direct supply of needed goods by individual states, thus obviating the reliance on currency susceptible to rampant inflation; in return the states were relieved of two-thirds of the taxes owed Congress. Beginning in December 1779 six states were required to supply corn and flour to fulfill the army's immediate needs. A more comprehensive state quota was enumerated in a "Demand of Committee of Congress for Supplies" dated 1 August 1780. The total quantity levied on twelve states was "30,000 barrels of Flour Monthly," "166,835 [pounds] beef or pork," "30,000 [pounds] Bacon," "225 Hogsheads of Rum per month," and "9,142 bushels of grain, for forage"; allotments of salt, corn, and tobacco were also called for. To transport these goods the states were to provide "250 Waggons, with harness compleat, four horses to each" and "1500 Horses, without Harness." 6
The result was hardly satisfactory and later that autumn General Washington noted the need for a change in food procurement. He described the situation up till then as one of "false hopes and temporary devices, instead of system and oeconomy ... the Army, if it is to depend upon State supplies, must disband or starve; and ... taxation alone ... cannot furnish the means to carry on the War." 7 A system of businessmen who contracted to purchase food and transport it to the army, was put in place, but only gradually. The year 1781 was a transitional period during which the contract method for supplying provisions was partially implemented; by 1782 the system was fully operational. Contracts were awarded for each stationary garrison, mobile army, or military district; unfortunately, when small detachments assigned to a post were absent they often still relied on that post for rations, with the result that some men were intermittently unprovided for. Additionally, while some contractors were relatively honest, others were less so and soldiers still suffered from poor quality food, even that sometimes in insufficient quantities. In May 1782 officers railed against the system, complaining, among other things, that
When the beef issued has any reasonable quantity of suet on the kidney it is always taken away by which the meat becomes unmerchantable and if the Contractor is authorized to take away any part of the carcass he may when it suits his convenience or interest deprive us of all the good parts and supply us only with the coarsest. 8
Contractors were also taken to task for "not issuing any vinegar since the first day of Jany: [1782] but once or twice in a small quantity" and "For deducting one fifth from the flour issued when there is not bread in store." Similar problems were experienced in the war's final year. Colonel Elias
8 Dayton wrote General William Heath in May 1783, "Complaint has been made to me by a number of the officers of the Jersey line, that the beef which has been issued to the soldiers for a week past was exceedingly bad in quality and in some instances so much spoiled as to be really unfit for use." The following day Heath reported the problem to General Washington: "There has been no provisions received by my Brigade for this day ... if some measures are not taken to remedy this evil it will be attended with dangerous consequences. Frequent complaints have been made to me by every grade of officers of this deficiency in the Contractors, as well as the extreme bad provisions which the troops have drawn for several weeks past." Thus, the contract system also resulted in "false hopes." 9
In retrospect the commissariat proved most effective in keeping the moving army and various garrisons supplied with food; unfortunately, this was only true given a stable economy, a strong and able quartermaster general at the helm, seconded by a competent commissary general, and diligent deputy quartermasters and commissaries. Under the auspices of Quartermaster General Nathanael Greene the commissariat was at its best. Early in the war the Quartermaster and Commissary Departments were crippled by a lack of organization or led by weak men; indeed, at different times one or the other of the leadership roles was left vacant for brief but crucial periods, most notably during the summer, autumn and winter of 1777. With the downfall of government credit and currency beginning in 1779 the commissariat had its foundations shattered. Thus, by the war's end the contract system of food supply was born, and, with all its faults, was retained by the army into the post-war years and through much of the 19th century.
Soldiers of Capt. Andrew Fitchs company, 4th Connecticut Regiment, in their mess groups preparing an evening meal. (Model Company event, Putnam Park, Redding, Ct., 25 to 27 September 2009. Photograph courtesy of the Model Company.)
9 "Owing to this variety of waste ..." Producing, Storing, and Transporting Bread
To better understand the sheer magnitude of the effort, let us look at food gathered for the army in summer 1777. After the resignation of Joseph Trumbull as commissary general, and just prior to the British landing at the Head of the Chesapeake Bay in late August, an "Estimate of Provisions" on hand or ready for purchase was compiled. In the Middle Department alone (comprising eastern Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and part of New York) there was listed 214,762 pounds of bacon, 40,000 pounds of hard bread, 46,370 barrels of flour, 2,000 barrels of herring, 1,380 barrels of pork, 193 barrels of beef (at roughly 200 pounds of meat per barrel), 20,379 1/2 bushels of Indian corn, 4,000 bushels of salt, 964 1/2 bushels peas, 1,983 head of cattle, plus unspecified lesser quantities of peas, flour, "Salted Provisions," and "Spirits." "Lying East of Hudsons River" (in New York and New England) were 17,100 barrels of "Beef & Pork," 20,000 barrels of flour, 50,000 bushels of salt, and "the Cattle in New England engaged to" Commissary Henry Champion, along with smaller stores of bacon, rum, sugar, wine and rice. Appended was the statement that "Immense Quantities is likewise in Connecticut, Eno[ugh] for one Year if the whole Army got that way." 10
Preparing rations for boiling a stew. The pictured foodstuff includes turnips, beef, salt pork, onions, potatoes, butter, and bread. Also shown are eggs and cheese, foods not on the list of army-supplied comestibles. (Captain David Browns Company of Concord Minutemen, 19- 20 April 2014, Minuteman National Historic Park.)
10 Of course, having large quantities of food in storage or on paper did not mean the troops received a sufficient diet. In July 1777, just before the aforementioned provision return was issued, General Washington complained,
With respect to Food, considering we are in such an extensive and abundant Country, No Army was ever worse supplied than ours with many essential Articles of it. Our Soldiers, the greatest part of last Campaign [in 1776], and the whole of this, have scarcely tasted any kind of Vegitables, had but little Salt, and Vinegar, which would have been a tolerable Substitute for Vegitables ... Neither have they been provided with proper drink. Beer or Cyder seldom comes within the verge of the Camp, and Rum in much too small quantities ... If these evils can be remedied the expence and trouble ought not to be obstacles. 11
While the above-listed commodities comprised the Continental ration it is those mainstays of military food, bread and beef, that will serve to illuminate the intricacies of food procurement, storage, and distribution. We will begin with flour and bread. Once sufficient provision stores were secured a myriad of practical matters still needed attending, and no one knew this better than Baker General Christopher Ludwick. In summer 1777 he described the many obstacles to be overcome in getting bread to the troops. He commented in August the "chief difficulty ... is that when the bread is baked he is at a loss to know in what manner he shall
An interesting representation of a masonry ovens used by Continental Army bakers. This example was built and operated by Yannig Tanguy, Crown Point Bread Co., at the 225 th
Battle of Saratoga event, October 2002. (Authors photograph)
11 dispose [of it] ... so that it may not be wasted"; to rectify this Ludwick recommended that "every Regiment Division or Post [appoint] a certain Officer ... who shall issue his Order to the nearest Station where bread is baked for the Quantity [wanted] from time to time ... receive the same on covered Waggons large and strong enough to carry a Ton And that the same Officer be charged to take Care of the Bread that it comes under a good Roof and not remain in the open fields." That same month, with the summer's campaign well under way and the "Grand Army very often ... so divided as to extend over a large Tract of Country," Ludwick noted, "as there is no Corps of Masons & Workmen following the Grand Army it is often impossible for one Man who is otherwise sufficiently occupied to go out seeking Masons, buying lime, seeing that the Ovens may be done right &c." He then questioned "Whether in such Cases the Superintendant [of Bakers] may not hire & charge for the Service of Men thus employed not strictly in the baking but in a business ... very necessary for the Oeconomy of Baking?" 12
Conditions at Fort Montgomery on the Hudson River proved the need for storage concerns. General George Clinton to the commander in chief, July 1777,
I this moment received your ... Order of this Day for sending 30,000 Wt: of Hard-Bread from this Post to King's Ferry to be transported from thence to Head Quarters. The Hard Bread was sent here in Bulk [probably in bags] and by the Time it was stored so much broken [as] to render it almost unfit to be used as I have no empty Casks at this Place I fear it would be impossible to convey it Head Quarters ... In the mean Time I have sent a Copy of the Order to Mr. Schenck at Fish Kill and directed him to send to this Post 30,000 Wt: properly put up in Casks to be forwarded to King's Ferry ... I have directed Mr. Schenck to send no more Bread in the Condition he sent the last as it cannot be removed, if requisite, without great Trouble and Loss.
Clinton noted in a postscript, "Since Writing the above I have myself viewed the Bread and find it to be even worse than the Commissary represented it - Nor have we a single ... Cask to put it in and should this also be the Case at Kings Ferry it will be impossible to get it to Head Quarters." 13
Other problems arose as the war progressed. Often flour was issued the men instead of baked bread. General Henry Knox wrote in March 1781 that "In the field, all the troops receive flour of the Commissary. Some regiments have soldiers who are bakers and are permitted by the commanding officer to go to some neighbouring house with other soldiers as their assistants, to bake for the regiment." 14 Knox expounded on the difficulty:
12
"Round ship's biscuit ... [with] Pencil inscription inked in." The inscription on the other side reads, "This biscuit was given Miss Blacket at Berwick on Tuesday 13 April 1784." Dimensions of the item are 95mm (3 inches) diameter by 10mm (9/16") thick. In this view the pattern of holes can clearly be seen, with no broad arrow or other Crown markings. (Museum negative number D40011), National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London. ________________________
flour ... if well baked, will not produce more than one hundred weight of hard bread for the same quantity of flour ... These bakers receive the flour from the soldiers and return them a ound of [soft] bread for a pound of flour, by which means the bakers make a neat profit to themselves of 30 percent in flour; and often times more, as they put as great a proportion of water as they please, there being no person whose duty it is to superintend them. This flour the bakers sell to the country people in the vicinity of the camp, to the infinite damage of the public or occupy public waggons, when the camp happens to move, to carry it away to a better market. Last year at Tappan, one or two soldiers who baked for part of one of the regiments of artillery, consisting of not more than 250 or 300 men, saved such a stock on hand of the profits of baking for a short time, as to be able, on an emergency, to lend the Commissary of the Park a sufficiency to issue one thousand rations for eight days ... Owing to this variety of waste and bad management the same quantity of flour does not serve the troops so long a time by nearly one third, as it would were it under a proper oeconomical regularity. 15
13 By the conflict's sixth year the system of providing soldiers bread was still inefficient and in much need of improvement. Knox set out some practical recommendations:
I propose, That there shall be a baker and two assistants to each brigade ... They should be furnished with a travelling oven, troughs and the necessary implements for baking, to transport which a waggon and four oxen should be allotted. One of the three persons, besides getting wood &ca, would be able to take care of and on a march drive these oxen. However, if three persons should be found insufficient, a fourth might be added, to serve as a wood cutter, &ca, which would render the assistance ample. The baker ought to be an honest faithful man. The Commissary to have the immediate direction of this matter - that is, to see that the quantity of bread which he receives from the baker answers properly to the quantity of flour delivered him ... There should also be a superintendent baker to the Army, whose business it should be to examine into the goodness of the bread made by the respective bakers. 16
According to General Knox there were several benefits to his plan: "... the Army would, under almost all circumstances, be certain of good bread, regularly issued, and the public would make the same quantity of flour serve nearly one third longer, than it does in the loose manner in which this business is at present conducted. They will save 30 per cent in value on all the flour consumed. They will also save the expence, risque and trouble of nearly one third of all the flour transportation, to replace that quantity which is now disipated in the manner related." The general ended by estimating that "Probably there will be issued to each brigade daily 1500 rations of bread - multiplied by the days of the year it will produce 547500 pounds, which must be supposed pounds of flour." Given the large quantities involved the exponential increase in wastage or savings is remarkable. 17
A mid-18 th century Conestoga wagon, reconstructed for Fort Ligonier, Ligonier, Pennsylvania. Wagons of this design were more often used to transport goods, including food, to the army, rather than for carrying military baggage. (http://fortligonier.org/ )
14 Whatever the commodity, transportation was always a crucial factor. For much of the war all Continental army wagons were procured by the Quartermaster's Department; these included vehicles carrying supplies to the army as well as those accompanying the troops. A Wagon Department, subordinate to the Quartermaster General, was created in 1777 to deal with the army's increasingly complex needs. The Wagonmaster General headed the department, with deputies assigned to the main army and each regional military department. In the Northern Department alone the deputy wagonmaster general had five wagonmasters under his direction; they, in turn, each had charge of one or more wagon brigades (with 10 to 12 vehicles) and their drivers. In 1780 the Wagon Department was reorganized; at that time the department had eleven deputy wagonmaster generals, one hundred and eight men specifically enlisted as wagonmasters, three soldiers serving as wagonmasters, two hundred fifty-six enlisted wagoners, one hundred and four wagoners taken from among the soldiery, and two hundred seventy-two hired wagoners. 18
The men who drove army supply wagons were occasionally negligent or dishonest, trading or dumping cargo in mid-course or draining brine from barreled salt meats to lighten the load and speed their way. Deputy Quartermaster Moore Furman described an instance of fraud in August 1779:
Having some conversation among the people at this Post about the Flour Coming forward from Trenton I stept in to see it ... there appears to be an unfair Trade Carrying on by somebody / several barrels were examined one of the lightest was weighed and proved to Contain 1:0:11 Flour. - the Head appeared to have been taken out the Center Scooped out and sides standing by which it appears that the Flour has been properly packed at first and plundered Since - Should not all the Provisions be inspected at Trenton as the Cartage is a very Expensive article and paying as much for transport ... for a Barrel half full as if it were full is worthy of attention besides the loss of Flour ...
In this case the driver may have been imposed upon; Furman continued, "One of the Waggoners here ... being asked how it happened that he took loading in so bad order Said that he Objected to it when it was delivered to him but was told he would be paid for Carting a Barrel and had nothing to do with what was in it -" 19
More often wagoners were trustworthy, overworked, and underpaid; Quartermaster General Nathanael Greene described driving wagons as a "Duty ... disagreeable in itself." Eighteen-year-old Joseph Joslin hauled flour, beef, pork, rum and hay from magazines in Connecticut to Washington's army in 1777 and 1778. Sleeping in barns, stables, or under open skies, he worked 13 or 14 hour days; on one occasion at 9 PM, the end of his workday, Joslin wrote, "It begun to Rain and then there was no fire and nothing to Eat but Dry Bisket and So it goes." In addition to being responsible for his lading, a wagoner had to maintain his vehicle and see to the draft animals' feeding and comfort throughout the day. Besides a hard life on the road, army officers entertained "a mistaken opinion ... [that] evry body has a right to correct a Waggoner." After 13 months Joslin, conscientious and hardworking, resigned, noting in his journal "I Don't Intend to Drive a team for my Continent anymore ... good-bye." 20
__________________________
15 For more on army bread, see: "Give us day by day our daily bread." Continental Army Bread, Ovens, and Bakers http://www.scribd.com/doc/125174710/Give-us-day-by-day-our-daily-bread-Continental-Army- Bread-Ovens-and-Bakers Contents Waste and bad management : Regulating Baking "Hard enough to break the teeth of a rat.": Biscuit in the Armies of the Revolution A bakehouse was built in eleven days Contemporary Baking Operations and Army Masonry Ovens Seeing that the Ovens may be done right : Bake Oven Designs The mask is being raised!!: EarlyWar Iron Ovens, and a Yorktown Campaign Bakery Hands are most wanted to bake bread for the Soldiers ": The Superintendent's Bakers "The essential service he rendered to the army ...": Christopher Ludwick, Superintendent of Bakers Addendum: Hard Biscuit Recipes
Linen haversacks were the preferred receptacle for carrying food. (One surviving British example measures 13 inches high by 16 inches wide, with a twoinch linen strap; the haversacks flap is closed with two buttons.) Here we see a typical Continental soldiers haversack, with boiled beef and hard biscuit in a wooden bowl. Linen bags inside the haversack were used for storing meat, flour, biscuits, bread, and other rations. Also shown are a tin cup, horn spoon, and tin canteen with a wool cover. (Photograph by the author.)
16 "We now have 500 head of fat cattle ...": 21
Procuring, Transporting, and Processing Livestock
Beef was but one element in the Revolutionary army's food chain, albeit an important one. Largely descended from British or German immigrants, or newly arrived from those countries, most American soldiers looked upon meat as the truly sustaining portion of their diet, more so than they did fish, bread, vegetables, or other items. Beef could be served up in one of two ways, each of which had their own inherent transportation and storage problems; live cattle could be sent to the army for immediate slaughter and distribution or to serve as a travelling food source following in the train of campaigning troops, or butchered meat could be barreled and preserved in salt brine. One man, Eaphroditus Champion, left an informative account of his services in the Commissary Department. His father Colonel Henry Champion was chief purchasing "commissary of fresh provisions" for the Continental army from "the year 1776 to ... 1780 ... and furnished the army with the greater part of the beef during these years." Historian John C. Dann described Eaphroditus as having "the mind of a merchant, a head for figures, and a decidedly mercenary outlook." These characteristics would have been a recommendation for the job, but in some individuals could have caused problems; Frederick the Great noted that commissaries should be carefully chosen for "If they are dishonest men, the sovereign can lose prodigiously from theft; under any circumstances they should be watched carefully." 22
Champion first served in 1776 as Deputy Commissary of Fresh Provisions. He related that "The appropriate duties of my office were to receive, provide for, and safely keep all the beef cattle, sheep, and livestock which were purchased for the army, cause the same to be butchered as daily necessities ... required, deliver the meat into the issuing stores, sell the hides and tallow, and keep and render all accounts of the weight of the meats and of all issues of meat and fresh provisions which I made to the issuing commissaries or stores. In short, I had the sole charge of the magazine of fresh provisions for the use of the main army. ... I was also required ... to keep [the commissary general] ... constantly informed of the state of supplies of fresh provisions and the number and condition of the beef cattle on hand ..." 23 A deputy commissary's responsibilities were spelled out in the department's 1777 reorganization:
the Commissary General of purchases [will] specially appoint Deputy Commissaries in each Department to purchase Live Stock, giving power to the [deputies] ... to employ persons ... to receive and kill the Cattle and to deliver the Meat, Hide, Tallow, Head and Tongues to the Commissary of Issues at such post ... And the commissary general of issues shall direct the respective deputy commissaries general to employ a suitable number of coopers |and packers,| who shall salt and pack provisions at the several magazines and stores, and take the proper precautions with respect to all provisions therein deposited. 24
Given the record keeping necessary to support the commissariat the younger Champion was likely very meticulous; he also seems to have had scruples. In October 1776 he "went to headquarters ... and received orders directly from [General Washington] relative to the beef cattle and their disposition"; a New York captain brought in nine locally-taken cattle for Champion "to receive and receipt. I declined to receive them, knowing them not to have been bought for the army, upon which he obtained an order from Adjutant General Reed ordering me [to do so] ... which I did." 25
17 After leaving the main army late in 1777 Champion went to Ulster County, New York, "to collect and deliver over to ... the deputy commissary general of purchases, five hundred head of beef cattle which had been placed there for fattening ..." During the winter of 1778 Eaphroditus Champion was appointed "deputy commissary general for supplying the army with beef cattle ... He immediately visited those parts of the country most capable of fattening cattle in the winter season, particularly the towns bordering on the Connecticut River in Massachusetts, a district of the country at that time far more capable of fattening cattle than any other in the United States. His object was to induce the people to fill their stalls and fatten cattle, assuring them that they should not be losers by it ... On the fifteenth of May, 1778, I commenced my services as purchasing commissary under [Colonel] Henry Champion ... From this time, my compensation as commissary was not a per diem compensation, as formerly, but a commission of 2 percent under the resolutions of Congress of April 14, 1778 ... I gave ... the bond required of ten thousand dollars, with two good and sufficient sureties ..." His last service was "In January 1780 [when] I purchased a drove of 142 head of fat cattle in ... Hampshire, Massachusetts. The last of this drove were purchased on the twenty-second of January ... When I made this purchase ... I had to remain, collect, and deliver the cattle to the drovers and then return home to Colchester and settle my accounts." 26
During his 542 days as deputy commissary of fresh provisions in 1776 and 1777 Eaphroditus compiled an imposing service record; he "received alive and delivered slaughtered or dressed for the use of the army 3,019,554 pounds of beef, 40,275 pounds of mutton, 18,639 pounds of pork, [and] 19,913 pounds of fat. Also, I received and delivered alive 3,257 beef cattle, 657 fat sheep, and 35 fat hogs." In his role as purchasing commissary he "purchased and delivered for the use of the army 3,710 fat cattle and 758 fat sheep ..." 27
While livestock could be herded where it was needed, difficulties were often encountered, especially when confronted with a substantial waterway. Beef cattle in large numbers are not easily carried on shipboard and even river crossings posed problems. In 1780 Oliver Phelps, "Superintend[ant of] Continental Purchases," wrote the Quartermaster General,
In forwarding public Cattle to Head Quarters the Drovers meet with the greatest difficulty in crossing Hudsons River, Some times have to tarry by the river two or three days before the Ferry men can be prevailed with to carry them a cross and no forrage to be got near the River, so the Cattle are in a starving condition while they are detained there - not less than Thirty has been drowned lately by bad conduct in the Ferrymen - I am repeatedly informed by the drovers, that they are treated with the greatest [ill-nature?] and ill-language by the Ferrymen - They express much joy at drowning Cattle. 28
Where ferries were unavailable or considered impractical there was another option for crossing livestock. During the march to Yorktown, Virginia, in August 1781 the commander in chief told Major General Benjamin Lincoln, "I do not hesitate in giving it as my opinion that every horse and Oxen should be Swam over the Delaware. A few Boats above and below the place they are made to enter the River, to give them a proper direction, will remove all difficulty and greatly facilitate the passage across." 29
Deputy Commissary Champion would have been quite familiar with the woes of caring for animals on the move and in difficult circumstances. During the growing season cattle could be fed by grazing, but the winter months posed a problem. From camp at New Windsor, New York, in
18 December 1781, Quartermaster General Timothy Pickering informed Deputy Quartermaster Hughes,
I found on my arrival here ... a letter from Mr. Thomas D[eputy]C[ommissary] Genll of Issues informing that about 200 head of cattle destined for the army were suffering for want of forage about eight miles from Fishkill. From the tenor of his letter I should suppose many of them were too lean for beef; these I hope will be spared from the knife. I wish the whole may be inspected immediately, & a return made to me of their condition. Such as are fit for beef, I shall readily supply with forage so long as it is necessary to keep them for a daily supply of fresh beef to the troops: but the rest ought to be disposed of for it is impossible for us to fat them; & to slaughter them would be clearly improper.
Pickering enclosed "ten guineas" to purchase forage "to be delivered where the cattle are kept, or rather, I suppose, you will have the cattle placed at one or two farmers who have forage to spare, & that the persons charged with the cattle will see daily delivered to them the quantity of forage necessary for them." 30
In February 1781 General Washington reiterated the difficulties of depending "on a daily supply of live Cattle" as opposed to preserved beef. To Governor Jonathan Trumbull of Connecticut he wrote,
The negligence of the Purchaser, or the Driver, the badness of the roads, or interruption of water, inevitably bring on a scarcity, which threatens the Army with dissolution. While on the contrary, a large stock [of cattle] in hand, produced by whatever contingency, is attended with waste, as neither the Commissary or Quarter Mastr. have the Means of disposing of the Cattle immediately, or supporting them alive in Camp. I have not the least doubt, but that the Army might be fed at half the present expence, by having proper Magazines [of salt provisions] laid in ... 31
Sometimes plans to lay in long-term stores were at odds with the immediate need to feed the army. In December 1780 Washington had been notified by Samuel Osgood and Oliver Phelps, "Contractors for supplying Beef, of "the Plan this Commonwealth [Massachusetts] has laid for filling the Magazines with salt Provisions ... for 1781 ... amounting to about sixteen thousand Barrels of Beef; with Directions to have the whole Quantity salted." They added the caveat that "if we should proceed to Barrel the whole of it, we shall not be able to forward any more live Cattle; If your Excellency should Judge that it will be of more Importance to have part of the Cattle forwarded alive than to have the whole barreled, your Directions in this Matter will be sufficient Justification of our Conduct ..." In any case the two contractors were apprehensive "that there is any Probability of procuring so large a Quantity of Beef in this State at this late Season of the Year ... we hope that what we have already delivered for salting & what we shall now procure will form a Magazine of some Consequence." 32 In addition to precluding the need for animal forage, barreled salt beef simplified water carriage. During the 1781 Yorktown Campaign General Washington notified the Maryland Governor, "Colo. Blaine has gone himself over to the Eastern shore to see that the Cattle from thence are brought down to the proper landings where they will be slaughtered, and the Meat sufficiently salted to be transported by Water ..." This obviated the need to carry live animals across the Chesapeake Bay; on the other hand the commander in chief wrote that "proper measures have been taken by the Commissaries to receive the Cattle of the Western Shore, and to have them driven [south] by Land." 33
19 Whether meat was salted or served up fresh, the army's butchers were an integral part of the process. Though their job was often performed under crude campaign conditions, Fifer Samuel Dewees described butchers working in a facility supporting the fortifications and barracks at West Point, New York:
... I have been down at our slaughter-house at times for the purpose of assisting in carrying the provision to camp, and have seen a great many cattle drove into it at one time. I recollect that, once we had to wait until the butchers would kill. They drove upwards of a hundred sheep into the slaughter-house, and as soon as the doors were closed, someof the butchers went to work and knocked the sheep down in every direction with axes, whilst others followed and stuckor bled them, others followed them, skinned them, hung them up and dressed them. A very short time elapsed from the time they commenced butchering them until our meat was ready for us. I recollect having been there at another time when they were killing bullocks ... I have known very great numbers of very fine and fat cattle slaughtered there, but if I have, I have seen many very poor and indifferent ones killed there also ... But with these we had to be content in the absence of better ..." 34
Just how many men would one animal feed? Records for the Revolutionary War have not been found, but we can get some idea from C.L. Kilburn's 1863 work Preparing Stores for the United States Army. He stipulated "Contracts for fresh beef should require steers, (not bulls, stags, heifers, or cows,) over four years of age, and weighing ordinarily 500 pounds each, net" ("net" meaning profit, or useable meat); "Prime mess pork is made of small hogs, fine boned, well fattened on corn only, and weighing from 130 to 170 pounds net, each." Kilburn also listed parts excluded from mess pork: "The head; the fore leg up to the breast or brisket and close to the body of the hog; the hind leg, including the hock or gambrel joint; and the rump, if the hams are not cut up with the side." For hogs we may deduct roughly one fifth to one quarter of the net weight if these undesirable cuts are included in Kilburn's estimate of "130 to 170 pounds net, each." Assuming the hogs supplied to Revolutionary armies were similar in size, 100 pounds of pork would supply a day's salt pork ration for 173 soldiers, at 3/4 pound per man. Considering that 18th century beef cattle were likely smaller than their later counterparts, an animal yielding 350 pounds of meat would feed 350 men for one day. 35
(For further discussion of barreled salt meats see Rees, "'Our pie-loving ... stomachs ... ache to even look.': Durable Foods for Armies, 1775-1865," Food History News, vol. IX, no. 4, Spring 1998)
20
"A Country Waggon from Long Island & New York" (drawn circa 1778), also known as a "Dutch" wagon. Francis Rush Clark, "Inspector and Superintendent of His Majesty's Provision Train of Wagons and Horses," wrote: "These were taken promiscuously from the Farmers on Long & Island Staten Island, & some from the Jerseys. Many of them in a wretch'd Condition, & none having any Cover, to protect their Loading." "Narrative of Occurences, relative to His Majesty's Provision Train in North America," (circa 1778), Francis Rush Clark Papers (no. 2338), Sol Feinstone Collection, David Library of the American Revolution. Drawing courtesy of the David Library, Washington Crossing, Pa.) ________________________________
Selected works by John U. Rees related to food in the armies of the American Revolution: "'The foundation of an army is the belly.' North American Soldiers' Food, 1756-1945," ALHFAM: Proceedings of the 1998 Conference and Annual Meeting, vol. XXI (The Assoc. for Living History, Farm and Agricultural Museums, Bloomfield, Ohio, 1999), 49-64. Part I. "'I live on raw salt pork ... hard bread and sugar.': The Evolution of Soldiers' Rations," and, Part II. "Salt Beef to C Rations: A Compendium of North American Soldiers' Rations, 1756-1945" (For Verger, see endnote #34) (World Wide Web, http://revwar75.com/library/rees/belly.htm).
Rations and cooking, Mark M. Boatner, Encyclopedia of the American Revolution: Library of Military History, Harold E. Selesky, ed. (2 nd Edition, Charles Scribners Sons, May 2006), 622-624.
Historical Overview: The Revolutionary War, Andrew F. Smith, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink in America, 2 vols. (New York and London: Oxford University Press, 2004), vol. 1, 622-624.
21 `A capital dish : Revolutionary Soldiers and Chocolate, Brigade Dispatch, vol. XXXVIII, no. 3 (Autumn 2008), 2-17. http://www.scribd.com/doc/131353233/%E2%80%9CA-capital-dish-%E2%80%A6-Revolutionary-Soldiers- and-Chocolate
`General Wayne's detachment is almost starving.: Provisioning Washingtons Army on the March, June 1778, Appendix N of "What is this you have been about to day?: The New Jersey Brigade at the Battle of Monmouth, http://revwar75.com/library/rees/monmouth/MonmouthToc.htm
"'To subsist an Army well ...': Soldiers' Cooking Equipment, Provisions, and Food Preparation During the American War for Independence: "All the tin Camp-kettles they can procure ...: Iron Pots, Pans, and Light- Weight Military Kettles, 1759-1782 Subheadings: Tin Kettles, 1759-1771 British Kettles in the American War, 1776-1781 Continental Army and States Militia, 1775-1780 American Sheet Iron Kettles, 1781-1782 Officers Cooking Equipment Kettle Covers The extreme suffering of the army for want of kettles : Continental Soldiers and Kettle Shortages in 1782 A disgusting incumbrance to the troops : Linen Bags and Carts for Carrying Kettles The Kettles to be made as formerly Kettle Capacity and Weight, and Archaeological Finds Subheadings: Kettle Capacity and Sizes, 1759-1782 Louisbourg Kettle, Cape Breton Island Fort Ligonier (Buckets or Kettles?) Rogers Island (Bucket or Kettle?) 1812 Kettles, Fort Meigs, Ohio Overview of Cooking Equipment, 1775-1783 Military Collector & Historian, vol. 53, no. 1 (Spring 2001), 7-23. http://www.scribd.com/doc/180835470/To-subsist-an-Army-well-Soldiers-Cooking-Equipment-Provisions- and-Food-Preparation-During-the-American-War-for-Independence
The common necessaries of life A Revolutionary Soldiers Wooden Bowl, including, Left sick on the Road: An Attempt to Identify the Soldier Left at the Paxson Home, Rolling Green, June 1778.) http://www.scribd.com/doc/123562525/%E2%80%9CThe-common-necessaries-of-life- %E2%80%A6%E2%80%9D-A-Revolutionary-Soldier%E2%80%99s-Wooden-Bowl or http://tinyurl.com/at3dj3e
`Six of our regt lived together : Mess Groups, Carrying Food (and a Little Bit of Tongue) in the Armies of the Revolution Mess Groups Food Distribution Carrying Food The Burden of Rations And Tongue http://revwar75.com/library/rees/pdfs/tongue.pdf
22 "`As many fireplaces as you have tents ...': Earthen Camp Kitchens: Part I. "`Kitchens sunk ... for the soldiers to Cook in.': The History of Cooking Excavations and Their Use in North America" Part II. Complete 1762 Kitchen Description and Winter Covering for Field Kitchens Part III. "`Ordered to begin work ...': Digging a Field Kitchen" http://revwar75.com/library/rees/kitchen.htm
"`To the hungry soul every bitter thing is sweet.: Soldiers' Food and Cooking in the War for Independence "The manner of messing and living together": Continental Army Mess Groups Who shall have this?: Food Distribution "A hard game ...": Continental Army Cooks On with Kittle, to make some hasty Pudding : How a "Continental Devil" Broke His Fast 1. The Army Ration and Cooking Methods. 2. Eating Utensils. 3. The Morning Meal. 4. Other Likely Breakfast Fare. Addenda The men were very industrious, in baking, all the forepart of the evening.: Soldiers Ingenuity, Regimental Bakers, and the Issue of Raw Flour The Commissary [is] desired to furnish biscuit and salt provisions : Hard Bread in the War for Independence. "The victuals became putrid by sweat & heat ...": Some Peripheral Aspects of Feeding an Army 1. The Ways Soldiers Carried Food 2. The Burden of Rations, 1762-1783 3. Carrying Drink and Procuring Water 4. Equipment Shortages 5. Spoilage of Issued Meats "We had our cooking utensils ... to carry in our hands.": Continental Army Cooking and Eating Gear, and Camp Kitchens, 1775-1782 Endnotes: #50. Compendium of Ration Allotments, 1754-1782 Continental Army rations (summary) British Army rations (summary) Caloric Requirements and Intake #73. Miscellaneous returns of cooking gear and eating utensils, 1778-1781 (Appended) List of authors articles on food in the armies of the American Revolution http://www.scribd.com/doc/129368664/To-the-hungry-soul-every-bitter-thing-is-sweet-Soldiers-Food-and- Cooking-in-the-War-for-Independence
Food History News series (http://foodhistorynews.com/index.html): "It was my turn to cook for the Mess: Provisions of the Common Soldier in the Continental Army, 1775 1783, Food History News, vol. VII, no. 1 (Fall 1995), 2, 8. "Sometimes we drew two days rations at a time.: The Soldiers' Daily Issue, FHN, vol. VII, no. 3 (Winter 1995), 23. "Drew 2 pound of Shugar and 1 pound of Coffee: Extraordinary Foodstuffs Issued the Troops, FHN, vol. VIII, no. 1 (Summer 1996), 23. "The unreasonable prices extorted ... by the market People: Camp Markets and the Impact of the Economy, FHN, vol. VII, no. 4 (Spring 1996), 23. "Complaint has been made by many of the Inhabitants: Soldiers' Efforts to Supplement the Ration Issue, FHN, vol. VIII, no. 2 (Fall 1996), 12, 7.
23 "Whilst in this country: Sullivan's Expedition and the Carolina Campaigns, FHN, vol. VIII, no. 3 (Winter 1996), 2, 67. http://www.scribd.com/doc/172542103/Whilst-in-this-country-Supplementing-Soldiers%E2%80%99- Rations-with-Regional-Foods-Sullivan-s-Expedition-1779-and-the-Carolina-Campaigns-1781-1782 "Hard enough to break the teeth of a rat.: Biscuit and Hard Bread in the Armies of the Revolution, (Also in the same issue, information on cooking with biscuit and hardtack during the American Civil War and the War for Independence in "Joy of Historical Cooking: Using Hardtack & Crackers."), FHN, vol. VIII, no. 4 (Spring 1997), 2, 35, 67. "The essential service he rendered to the army: Christopher Ludwick, Superintendent of Bakers, FHN, vol. IX, no. 1 (Summer 1997), 2, 6. The Gingerbread Man: More on Washingtons Baking Superintendent, Then and Now, FHN, vol. XVII, no. 1 (Summer 2005), 2. "As many fireplaces as you have tents: Earthen Camp Kitchens, FHN, vol. IX, no. 2 (Fall 1997), 2, 89, plus Matt and I Dig a Kitchen: Recreating an 18thCentury Cooking Excavation, FHN, vol. IX, no. 3 (Winter 1998), 2. Also published as "Earthen Camp Kitchens, Muzzleloader, vol. XXX, no. 4 (September/October 2003), 5964. For online version see (World Wide Web), http://revwar75.com/library/rees/kitchen.htm "Our pieloving ... stomachs ... ache to even look.: Durable Foods for Armies, 17751865, FHN, vol. IX, no. 4 (Spring 1998), 2, 78. "Tell them never to throw away their ... haversacks or canteens: Finding Water and Carrying Food During the War for Independence and the American Civil War, FHN, vol. X, no. 1 (37), 2, 89. "The victuals became putrid by sweat & heat: Equipment Shortages, the Burden of Rations and Spoilage During the War for Independence and the War Between the States, FHN, vol. X, no. 2 (38), 2, 67. "False hopes and temporary devices: Organizing Food Supply in the Continental Army: part I. To subsist an Army well: An Organizational Overview, FHN, vol. XII, no. 3 (47), 2, 910. part II. Owing to this variety of waste : Producing, Storing, and Transporting Bread, FHN, vol. XII, no. 4 (48), 2, 910. part III. We now have 500 head of fat cattle: Procuring, Transporting, and Processing Livestock, FHN, vol. XII, no. 4 (48), 2, 89. A perfect nutriment for heroes!: Apples and North American Soldiers, 17571918, FHN, vol. XIV, no. 1 (53), 2, 6. The oficers are Drunk and Dancing on the table : U.S Soldiers and Alcoholic Beverages, FHN, vol. XIV, no. 2 (54), 2. The repast was in the English fashion : Washingtons Campaign for Refined Dining in the War for Independence, FHN, vol. XIV, no. 3 (55), 2. "Give us Our Bread Day by Day.: Continental Army Bread, Bakers, and Ovens: part I. Waste and bad management : Regulating Baking, FHN, vol. XV, no. 4 (60), 2, 9. part II.A bakehouse was built in eleven days : Contemporary Baking Operations and Army Masonry Ovens, FHN, vol. XVI, no. 1 (61), 2, 8. part III. Seeing that the Ovens may be done right : Bake Oven Designs, FHN, vol. XVI, no. 3 (63), 2, 8. part IV. The mask is being raised!!: Denouement: EarlyWar Iron Ovens, and a Yorktown Campaign Bakery, FHN, vol. XVI, no. 4 (64), 2. Invited to dine with Genl Wayne; an excellent dinner : Revolutionary Commanders Culinary Equipage in Camp and on Campaign: part 1 Plates, once tin but now Iron : General Washingtons Mess Equipment, FHN, vol. XVII, no. 2 (66), 2, 8. part 2 40 Dozens Lemons, in a Box: British Generals Provisions and Mess Equipage, FHN, vol. XVII, no. 3 (67), 2, 8. part 3 A Major General & family: Nathanael Greenes Food Ware, FHN, vol. XVII, no. 4 (68), 2. part 4 My poor cook is almost always sick : General Riedesel Goes to America, FHN, vol. XVIII, no. 1 (69), 23.
24 Sufficient for the army for fifteen days : Continental Army Frozen Rations, FHN, vol. XVIII, no. 2 (70), 2. "The manner of messing and living together: Continental Army Mess Groups, FHN, vol. XVIV, no. 2 (74), 2, 5. "A hard game: Cooks in the Continental Army (not yet published) On with Kittle, to make some hasty Pudding : How a Continental Devil Broke His Fast (not yet published) "We had our cooking utensils ... to carry in our hands.: Light-Weight Military Kettles, 1775-1782 (not yet published). (Included in the endnotes: Tin Kettles, 1759-1771; British and German Kettles; Kettle Capacity and Weight, and Excavated Artifacts, Circa 1750-1815.) "They were made of cast iron and consequently heavy.: Eating Utensils and Less Commonly Used Cooking Implements, 1775-1783 (not yet published) "A better repast: Continental Army Field and Company Officers Fare (series closing column, not yet published)
A detachment on the march. All carry food in knapsacks or haversacks, and several carry camp kettles in their hands or slung in linen bags. The lone female follower carries a blanket roll and a market wallet. (Dunlaps Partisan Corps as portrayed by the Augusta County Militia and friends. Picquet post at Brandywine event, 24-26 September 2010.)
25 Endnotes
The following works are indispensable to any study of Continental Army organization and supply systems:
Robert K. Wright, Jr., The Continental Army (Washington, D.C., 1983), 114-115.
Erna Risch, Supplying Washington's Army (Washington, D.C., 1981), 177.
1. Henry Knox to Washington, 24 March 1781, George Washington Papers, Presidential Papers Microfilm (Washington, 1961), series 4, reel 76. 2. Robert K. Wright, Jr., The Continental Army (Washington, D.C., 1983), 36, 114-115. Erna Risch, Supplying Washington's Army (Washington: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1981), 171, 176, 177. Ms. Risch's work gives the most detailed treatment of Continental Army logistical support. Another excellent work, focusing more on the political aspects of supply, is E. Wayne Carp, To Starve an Army at Pleasure: Continental Army Administrators and Political Culture, 1775-1783 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1984). 3. Robert K. Wright, Jr., The Continental Army (Washington, D.C., 1983), 114-115. Erna Risch, Supplying Washington's Army (Washington, D.C., 1981), 177. 4. Worthington Chauncey Ford, Journals of the Continental Congress 1774-1789, vol. VIII (Washington, D.C., 1907), 439. For a broadside text of the 1777 commissary department reorganization see, Congressional Resolution, "Extracts from the Minutes. Published by Order of Congress," 10 June 1777, Washington Papers, series 4, reel 42. 5. Erna Risch, Supplying Washington's Army, 29. 6. Samuel Hazard, ed., Pennsylvania Archives. Selected and Arranged from Original Documents ..., vol. VIII (Philadelphia, Joseph Severns & Co., 1853), 472-473. 7. Washington to John Cadwalader, 5 October 1780, Fitzpatrick, WGW, vol 17 (1937), 121-122. 8. Complaints against the Contractors, May 1782, Washington Papers, series 4, reel 85. 9. Ibid. Elias Dayton to William Heath; 28 May 1783, Heath to Washington, 29 May 1783, Washington Papers, series 4, reel 91. 10. "An Estimate of Provisions in the Hands of Joseph Trumbull Esqr. late Commissary General and ready to be delivered over to the Commissary General of Issue ...", 8 August 1777, Washington Papers, George Washington Papers, Presidential Papers Microfilm (Washington, D.C., 1961), series 4, reel 43. 11. Washington to Philip Livingston, Elbridge Gerry, and George Clymer (Committee of Congress), 19 July 1777, John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources 1745-1799, vol. 8, (Washington, DC, 1933), 441. 12. Christopher Ludwick to the Continental Congress, 4 August 1777, The Papers of the Continental Congress 1774-1789, National Archives Microfilm Publications M247 (Washington, DC, 1958), reel 50, 193-194. Washington to Christopher Ludwick, 25 July 1777, Fitzpatrick, WGW, vol. 8 (1933), 475. 13. George Clinton to George Washington, 24 July 1777, Washington Papers, series 4, reel 43. 14. Henry Knox to Washington, 24 March 1781, ibid., series 4, reel 76. 15. Ibid.
26 16. Ibid. 17. Ibid. 18. Erna Risch, Supplying Washington's Army (Washington, D.C., 1981), 66-71, 75. For an excellent overview of wagons, transporting supplies to the army, and all the difficulties encountered see, ibid., 64-90. See also, John U. Rees, "`Employed in carrying cloathing & provisions': Wagons and Watercraft During the War for Independence," Part I. "`Country Waggons,' `Tumbrils,' and `Philadelphia Carts': Wheeled Transport in the Armies of the Revolution," ALHFAM Bulletin (Association for Living History, Farm and Agricultural Museums), vol. XXIX, no. 3 (Fall 1999), 4- 9, and The Continental Soldier (Journal of the Continental Line), vol. XII, no. 2 (Winter 1999), 18- 25. 19. Moore Furman to Daniel Marsh, 29 August 1779, The Letters of Moore Furman, Deputy Quarter-Master General of New Jersey in the Revolution (New York, N.Y., 1912), 15. 20. E. Wayne Carp, To Starve the Army at Pleasure (Chapel Hill and London, Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1984), 61-63. 21. In 1776 troops under American General Horatio Gates were marching south to reinforce General George Washington. Chaplain David Avery, 15th Massachusetts Regiment, noted "We now have 500 head of fat cattle in the rear, this side Bethlehem, which have followed Sullivan's division." Avery wrote that at least some of the cattle had come all the way from Connecticut. William M. Dwyer, The Day is Ours! (New York, N.Y., 1983), 206. (Original source, David Avery's diary, Connecticut Historical Society. The diary can be found in "The Papers of David Avery, 1746-1818"; microfilmed documents and diary transcript held by the Speer Library of the Princeton Theological Seminary.) 22. Eaphroditus Champion served as "deputy commissary of fresh provisions from April 1776 to October 1777 with the main army; purchasing commissary from October 1777 to February 1778, also with the main army; deputy to his father, supplying fresh beef from the Connecticut Valley to Valley Forge from February to May 1778; and again as a regularly appointed commissary from May 1778 until January 1780, stationed in the Connecticut Valley, buying and sending on cattle to the army." John C. Dann, ed., The Revolution Remembered: Eyewitness Accounts of the War for Independence (Chicago and London, 1980), 366-371. "The Instruction of Frederick the Great for His Generals," first printed in English in 1762 under the title "Military Instructions by the King of Prussia." Thomas R. Phillips, Brig. Gen., ed., Roots of Strategy (Harrisburg, Pa., 1985), 324. 23. Champion deposition, The Revolution Remembered, 367. 24. Worthington Chauncey Ford, Journals of the Continental Congress 1774-1789, vol. VIII (Washington, D.C., 1907), 439, 446. For a broadside text of the 1777 commissary department reorganization see, Congressional Resolution, "Extracts from the Minutes. Published by Order of Congress," 10 June 1777, George Washington Papers, Presidential Papers Microfilm (Washington, D.C., GPO, 1961), series 4, reel 42. 25. Champion deposition, The Revolution Remembered, 368. 26. Ibid., 368-371. 27. Ibid., 371. 28. Oliver Phelps to Timothy Pickering, 27 November 1780, Miscellaneous Numbered Records (The Manuscript File) in the War Department Collection of Revolutionary War Records, 1775- 1790's, Record Group 93, National Archives Microfilm Publication M859, reel 82, no. 23736.
27 29. Washington to Benjamin Lincoln, 24 August 1781, John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., The Writings of George Washington, 23 (Washington, GPO, 1937), 43. 30. Timothy Pickering to Hugh Hughes (DQM) or Major Keese (ADQM), from New Windsor, 16 December 1781, Numbered Record Books Concerning Military Operations and Service, Pay and Settlement Accounts, and Supplies in the War Department Collection of Revolutionary War Records, Record Group 93, National Archives Microfilm Publication M853 (Washington, D.C., 1973), vol. 82, target 2, reel 26, 250-251. 31. George Washington to Jonathan Trumbull, 4 February 1781, Fitzpatrick, WGW, vol. 21 (Washington, DC, 1937), 181. 32. Samuel Osgood and Oliver Phelps to Washington, 15 December 1780, Washington Papers, series 4, reel 73. 33. Washington to Thomas Sim Lee, Governor of Maryland, 12 October 1781, Fitzpatrick, WGW, vol. 23 (1937), 209-210. 34. Samuel Dewees, A History of the Life and Services of Captain Samuel Dewees ... The whole written (in part from a manuscript in the handwriting of Captain Dewees) and compiled by John Smith Hanna (Printed by R. Neilson, 1844), 163-165. 35. C.L. Kilburn, Preparing Stores for the United States Army; and on the Care of the Same, Etc. ... (Cincinnati, W.A. Webb, Printer, 1863), 9, 23 (Kilburn was a Lt. Colonel and assistant commissary general of subsistence). "A Return of Provisions &c. Purchased and Delivered, under the Direction of Udny Hay Agent for the State of New York, from August to 30 November 1780 ..." (enclosed in Udny Hay to Washington, 29 December 1780), Washington Papers, series 4, reel 73.
28
A private of the 4 th Connecticut Regiment. The author at the March 2014 Model Company event at Valley Forge.
29
Soldiers of the 4th Connecticut Regiment, 1778. Model Company event, Valley Forge. 29-30 March 2014.
30 World of the Common Soldier
John U. Rees 136 North Sugan Road, New Hope, Pa. 18938 Phone: (215) 862-2348 Email: ju_rees@msn.com
John Rees has written almost 200 articles and monographs since 1986 on various aspects of the common soldiers' experience, focusing primarily on the War for Independence. Current works and interests include soldiers food (1755 to the present day), Continental Army conscription (1777-1782), the organization and service of the late-war Pennsylvania battalions, and the common soldiers burden. Johns work has appeared in the ALHFAM Bulletin (Association of Living History, Farm, and Agricultural Museums), American Revolution (Magazine of the American Revolution Association), The Brigade Dispatch (Journal of the Brigade of the American Revolution), The Continental Soldier (Journal of the Continental Line), Gastronomica: The Journal of Food and Culture, Journal of the Johannes Schwalm Historical Association, Military Collector & Historian, Minerva: Quarterly Report on Women and the Military, Muzzleloader Magazine, On Point: The Newsletter of the Army Historical Foundation, Percussive Notes (Journal of the Percussive Arts Society), and Repast (Quarterly Publication of the Culinary Historians of Ann Arbor). He was a regular columnist for the quarterly newsletter Food History News for 15 years writing on soldiers' food, wrote four entries for the Oxford Encyclopedia of American Food and Drink, thirteen entries for the revised Thomson Gale edition of Boatners Encyclopedia of the American Revolution, contributed a chapter to Carol Karels The Revolutionary War in Bergen County (2007), and two chapters to Barbara Z. Marchants Revolutionary Bergen County, The Road to Independence (2009). A partial article list plus many complete works are available online at http://www.revwar75.com/library/rees/ . Selected Civil War monographs posted online at http://www.libertyrifles.org/research/ Additional monographs posted at http://www.scribd.com/jrees_10
(Section A) "I Expect To Be Stationed in Jersey Sometime... ": A Narrative History of Second New Jersey Regiment, December 1777 To June 1779 (Section A.)
“A quantity of public leather … made up into shoes and accoutrements …” Soldiers, Prisoners, and Deserters at the Continental Manufactory in Philadelphia (Including the role of artificer companies and regiments.)