Cool War — Warm War — Hot War

Embed Doc
Copy Link
Readcast
Collections

CommentGo Back

Download

Cool War — Warm War — Hot War

by Paul Weston

If there is one issue on which the liberal/left and I can agree, it is that neither partywishes to see another war in Europe. My personal feeling is that the suicidal belief systems of the Western elites will not only lead to war , but — as an added bonus — also serve as a virtual blueprint on how to subsequently lose it. Such a paranoid outlook, of course, is not shared with those of the spiritually enlightened left.They are more in tune with the European Union’s motto, “United In Diversity” which intruth is more a phrase of liberal wishful thinking than one grounded in reality. There areseveral groups of people who would testify to this, notably the Serbs, Croats andMuslims of ex-Yugoslavia, the non-Muslim Africans in the Sudan, the Jews of Israeland their dwindling remainder in the Middle East, the Tutsis and the Hutus, theCatholics and Protestants of Northern Ireland or even the Flemish and Walloon populations of Belgium itself — to name but a few.In fact, it would be hard to find a phrase exhibiting such an awe-inspiring example of utter historical ignorance coupled with sinister Orwellian doublethink, save perhaps for “Arbeit Macht Frei”, the “welcome” sign above the gates of Auschwitz concentrationcamp.It should never be forgotten that the Nazi party were the one-time allies of theCommunists, those moral-free “egalitarians” whose present day ideological progenynow run the European Union on unelected soft totalitarian fiat, unashamed that their motto harks back to the sloganeering of genocidal regimes, and unaware,

apparently,

that they are setting the wheels in motion for future genocidal conflict.What the liberal/left palpably fail to realise, is that not only must our present policy of “United In Diversity” — manifested as it is, in mass immigration and multiculturalrelativism — inevitably lead to war, but that we are

already

at war on many fronts, andwe are

losing

all of them.A full scale war between Islam and the West, should it materialise, will be the “HotWar” that must logically follow the “Cool” and “Warm” wars currently being waged inEurope specifically, and the West as a whole.The

cool

war is carried out on a number of fronts and is made up of theculture/civilisation war; the political/propaganda war; the demographic/immigrationwar; the territorial war; the faith war and the knowledge war. The

warm

war is made upof terrorism, jihad, and the end game of total war, described by James Burnham in his book

Suicide Of The West

as: “Political control over acreage.”

The Culture / Civilisation War

- - - - - - - - -The culture/civilisation war has been ongoing for several decades, but appears to bereaching its peak in the attitude demonstrated not only by the vitriolic hatred shown

toward the West by radical Islam, but also by the liberal elites of Western societies as well, who appear to perversely loathe their own people and their own culture.On Sep 8 2001, the UN held a conference in Durban, under theheading: “The United Nations Conference Against Racism,Racial Intolerance And Xenophobia.” America, aware of theimpending anti-Western hate mongering, declined to join them, but the best of the rest of the West were arrayed in force.America’s suspicion turned out to be remarkably prescient. The event turned into a hatefest.The Cuban dictator Fidel Castro was introduced to rapturous applause as: “The leader of the most democratic country in the world” whilst Robert Mugabe, the altogether barmyPresident of Zimbabwe, taking a well-earned rest from the persecution of his white and black countrymen, was similarly cheered to the rafters in his denunciation of the whiteimperialist oppressor; his ovation only surpassed by that offered up for the Syrian PrimeMinister’s denial of the Holocaust.Britain’s Tony Blair, France’s Lionel Jospin, Canada’s Jean Chretien, and anaesthetically displeasing assortment of Europe’s great and good, beat their collective breasts in time with the rhythmic thudding of the anti-racist bongo drums, offering nocounter-arguments such as the ethnic cleansing of whites from Zimbabwe, or theimprisoning of AIDS victims in the Cuban “socialist paradise,” choosing instead to raisetheir soft, bruised hands aloft and proclaim

“Yes, you are correct. We are white, we areWestern and we are

GUILTY!

“

The UN’s Mary Robinson declared the event a great success. The oppressors and theoppressed packed their bags, paused briefly at the airport to exchange a little more brown hatred for white guilt, and went home. Forty-eight hours later, Muslim terroristsflew three hijacked aircraft into the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, thus ensuringcelebrations all over the non-Western world, indeed even within the West itself, whereMuslims danced in the streets and liberal Western intellectuals crowed that America hadfinally been given the bloody nose she so manifestly deserved. No doubt those noted anti-racists, Mugabe and Castro, danced until dawn, such vitrioland hatred for the first world from the third being nothing new. But even with 9/11 ontop of the obscene appeasement in Durban, our liberal elites still refused to admit tothemselves that their culture was any better than that of Islam’s. Nothing personifiesthis more than the controversy caused by the remarks made by (the then) Italian PrimeMinister, Silvio Berlusconi, who, in the wake of the 9/11 Islamic terrorist outrages,stated:

“We must be aware of the superiority of our civilisation, a system that has guaranteed well-being, respect for human rights, and — in contrast with Islamic countries — respect for religious and political rights.”

Such a statement, at such a time, should not have been controversial. After all, howcould Western Civilisation possibly be held as the moral and cultural equivalent of Islam — a religious and

political

ideology that orchestrated and celebrated theindiscriminate slaughter of innocent men, women and children in the name of Allah?

But controversial it turned out to be. No sooner had thewords left his lips than a bevy of European politiciansrushed to denounce his heresy. Belgian Prime Minister,Guy Verhofstadt, said:

“I can hardly believe that the Italian Prime Minister made such statements!”

whilst JeanChristophe-Filori, the spokesman for the EuropeanCommission, added: “

We certainly don’t share the viewexpressed by Mr. Berlusconi,”

and to round off a positively surreal day of reality denial and anti-Westernloathing, Italy’s centre left opposition spokesman, Giovanni Berlinguer, called thestatement

“eccentric and dangerous.”

Faced with such an onslaught, Berlusconi wasforced to retract his factually correct statement within a matter of days.Such anti-Western sentiment is no longer merely confined to the mindset of our rulingelites. By successfully infiltrating the educational establishments, the liberal/left havecaptured the most important section of society that any wannabe totalitarian regimecould wish for; the unformed minds of unquestioning small children, upon whom theycould indoctrinate and brainwash to their hearts content.The liberal/left culture war in our schools and universities has been carried out over atleast four decades, and has been extraordinarily successful. Targeting children as youngas three in order to“unlearn” racism, young Westerners have been persuaded that their history is one of national imperialism, Christian imperialism, white privilege,oppression, genocide and racial brutality. They have been brainwashed into believingthat their country, race, religion, culture and history — or more succinctly,

the veryessence of their being

— is not something to be proud of, but something to be ashamedof.This is a powerful and potentially lethal form of disarmament. Wars have always beenfought over four basic impulses: the acquisition of territory, the subjugation of a race or tribe, the subjugation of a religion and the subjugation of a culture. If young Westernersare as ashamed — as they say they are — of their country, race, religion, culture andhistory, then they will not be particularly keen to even verbally defend them, as is thecase today, let alone to fight and die for them. As, no doubt, was the intention.Some may say the removal of reasons to fight can only be a good thing, that it will leadto peace and prosperity for all men, for all time. But multiculturalism does not work thatway. Whilst we are shamed into perpetual appeasement, the non-European and non-Christian groups within the West are taught the exact opposite. Their cultures and their religions are held up as paragons of virtue, they are taught to think and act as distinctracial or religious groups, whilst being encouraged to believe that any difference incivilisational success between their culture and Western culture is due solely to their historical and present day oppression by the prejudiced West.As wars are traditionally fought by males, so another vital part of the culture war is toremove the natural aggression prevalent amongst boys and adolescents. To this end,young Western males are encouraged — nee forced — to lay down their toy guns, endtheir games of cowboys and Indians, cease taking part in competitive sport with itsinevitable winners and losers, and instead to play with dolls, get in touch with their “inner selves,” develop their “self esteem” through the “medium of dance” and toexpress their “emotions” in “empathy workshops.”

of 00

Leave a Comment