/  69
 
 
GAO
United States Government Accountability Office
Report to Congressional Addressees
CREDIT CARDSRising InterchangeFees Have IncreasedCosts for Merchants,but Options forReducing Fees PoseChallenges
November 2009GAO-10-45
 
What GAO Found
United States Government Accountability Office
Why GAO Did This Study
H
ighlights
Accountability Integrity Reliability
November 2009
 
CREDIT CARDS
Ri
s
in
g
Interchan
g
e Fee
s
Have Increa
s
ed Co
s
t
s
forMerchant
s
, but Option
s
for Reducin
g
Fee
s
Po
s
eChallen
g
e
s
 
Highlights ofGAO1045--, a report to congressional addressees
When a consumer uses a creditcard to make a purchase, themerchant does not receive the full purchase amount because a certain portion of the sale is deducted tocompensate the merchant’s bank,the bank that issued the card, andthe card network that processesthe transaction. The level andgrowth of these rates have becomeincreasingly controversial. The2009 Credit Card Accountability,Responsibility, and Disclosure Actdirected GAO to review (1) how thefees merchants pay have changedover time and the factors affectingthe competitiveness of the creditcard market, (2) how credit cardcompetition has affectedconsumers, (3) the benefits andcosts to merchants of acceptingcards and their ability to negotiatethose costs, and (4) the potentialimpact of various options intendedto lower merchant costs.To address these objectives, GAOreviewed and analyzed relevantstudies, literature, and data on thecard payment market andinterviewed industry participants,including large and small cardissuers (including communitybanks and credit unions), card processors, card networks, largemerchants representing asignificant proportion of retailsales, and small merchants from a variety of industries, and academicexperts.GAO provided a draft of this reportto the Department of Justice, theFederal Trade Commission, andfederal banking regulators, and weincorporated their technicalcomments where appropriate.
 According to Federal Reserve analysis, total costs of accepting credit cardsfor merchants have risen over time as consumers use cards more. Part of these increased costs also may be the result of how Visa and MasterCardcompeted to attract and retain issuers to offer cards by increasing the numberof interchange fee categories and the level of these rates. Concerns remainover whether the level of these rates reflects market power—the ability of some card networks to raise prices without suffering competitive effects—orwhether these fees reflect the costs that issuers incur to maintain credit card programs. Issuers, particularly smaller issuers such as community banks andcredit unions, report relying on interchange fees as a significant source of revenue for their credit card operations, and analyses by banking regulatorsindicate such operations traditionally have been among the most profitabletypes of activities for large banks.Some consumers have benefited from competition in the credit card market,as cards often have no annual fees, lower interest rates than they did yearsago, and greater rewards. However, consumers who do not use credit cardsmay be paying higher prices for goods and services, as merchants pass ontheir increasing card acceptance costs to all of their customers.For merchants, the benefits of accepting credit cards include increased salesand reduced labor costs. However, representatives from some of the largemerchants with whom we spoke said their increased payment costsoutstripped any increased sales. These merchants also reported that theirinability to refuse popular cards and network rules (which prevent chargingmore for credit card than for cash payments or rejecting higher-cost cards)limited their ability to negotiate payment costs. Interchange fees are notfederally regulated in the United States, but concerns about card costs have prompted federal investigations and private lawsuits, and authorities in morethan 30 countries have taken or are considering taking actions to address suchfees and other card network practices.Proposals for reducing interchange fees in the United States or othercountries have included (1) setting or limiting interchange fees, (2) requiringtheir disclosure to consumers, (3) prohibiting card networks from imposingrules on merchants that limit their ability to steer customers away fromhigher-cost cards, and (4) granting antitrust waivers to allow merchants andissuers to voluntarily negotiate rates. If these measures were adopted here,merchants would benefit from lower interchange fees. Consumers would alsobenefit if merchants reduced prices for goods and services, but identifyingsuch savings would be difficult. Consumers also might face higher card usecosts if issuers raised other fees or interest rates to compensate for lostinterchange fee income. Each of these options also presents challenges forimplementation, such as determining at which rate to set, providing moreinformation to consumers, or addressing the interests of both large and smallissuers and merchants in bargaining efforts.
View GAO1045 or key components. --For more information, contact Alicia PuenteCackley at (202) 512-8678 orcackleya@gao.gov.

Share & Embed

More from this user

Add a Comment

Characters: ...