Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Progressivism: the Destruction of America

Progressivism: the Destruction of America

Ratings: (0)|Views: 11|Likes:
Published by Acharne Dokument
America, as a nation, established in the 1700’s, through the blood of patriots, liberated her bondage from socialist authoritarian governments. A limited government based on a democratic Republic, right of ownership, and a free market economy. Her presidents hired as termed administrators who, by oath of office, upheld her constituted liberties and limited managerial constructs so power remains with the individual.
America, as a nation, established in the 1700’s, through the blood of patriots, liberated her bondage from socialist authoritarian governments. A limited government based on a democratic Republic, right of ownership, and a free market economy. Her presidents hired as termed administrators who, by oath of office, upheld her constituted liberties and limited managerial constructs so power remains with the individual.

More info:

Published by: Acharne Dokument on Jun 06, 2014
Copyright:Traditional Copyright: All rights reserved

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/22/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Acharnedokument@Acharnedokument Page 1
Progressivism: the Destruction of  America
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of “Progressivism” they
will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened." 
 Norman Thomas.
Six-time president of the
Socialist Party of America
 America, as a nation, established in the 1700‘s
, through the blood of patriots, liberated her bondage from socialist authoritarian governments. A limited government based on a democratic Republic, right of ownership, and a free market economy. Her presidents hired as termed administrators who, by oath of office, upheld her constituted liberties and limited managerial constructs so power remains with the individual. Progressivism, starting in the late 1800
‘s,
 was a massive assault on the problems that plagued  American life at the turn of the century. Their targets included working conditions such as hours, safety, wages and job security. They attacked abuses of the capitalist system in order to preserve it, rather than replace it with socialist alternatives. They addressed moral issues such as prostitution and alcohol abuse, which they saw as contributing to domestic violence. The progressives wanted better management of businesses and political entities such as cities and counties. They wanted fairness in all things, although the progressives were less than aggressive in
addressing civil rights for minorities, including Indians. The ―New Progressive‖ of today
share common ideology with the CPUSA (Communist Party USA) and DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) the very opposite to constituted Liberty. Unlike known communist
 
Acharnedokument@Acharnedokument Page 2
groups, the
―New‖
 Progressives know not to use key words that associate negativity in a
free economy, ―socialism‖ and ―communism‖
 (the failed and corrupt communist/socialist Soviet Union). CPC (Congressional Progressive Caucus)
, ―New Progressive Coalition‖,
 
and ―New Democrat Coalition‖
 are growing in power and influence in congress especially in the original Democratic Party but not limited to Liberalism. CPC and others are now involved with writing congressional budgets, Stimulus spending, healthcare reform, and now has direct ties to Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton and the office of the presidency. Elizabeth Warren, Obama
‘s f 
ormer appointed advisor of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and now serving in the US Senate; praising Communist China as a Model for America and proposes communism in US government. (1)(CC) Communist Party USA PAC leader Joelle Fishman reported CPUSA uses the
Congressional Progressive Caucus as ―an important lever‖ to ―move the debate to the left.‖ And ―We have the opportunity to build something big, a large, influential and
effective Communist Party USA. After the incredible movement to elect Barack Obama, more far-reaching solutions and socialism in particular are back at the dinner table for
discussion.‖ A February 2, 2010 Communist Party USA article ―Convention Discussion:  A Time to Grow‖
 
explained they plan to meet their goals by running for office ―within the auspices of the Democratic Party‖ because ―conditions rarely if ever allow us to run open Communists for office.‖
 President Barack Obama
signed a ―contract‖ pr 
omising to publicly support the Socialist/Progressive organization,
New Party
. (AA)
 
“   
The Progressives Left greatest assets are to suppress information and indoctrinate authoritarian ideologies under the guise of traditional American values 
”     
 
A Basic Freedom; Individual Rights.
One of the basic freedoms of Liberty is the right to property; ownership.
Capitalism
, first used to define rights to property date back to the lat
e 1800‘s, well after the
signing of the US constitution, was a modern expression defining ownership; by assets, revenues and savings
 –
opposite to communist ideology. Also, ownership means the control of personal assets. If an American owns a house, they control that asset. If an American owns a business, they control that investment and how to fund expansion by profits. If an American buys a policy of a private sector healthcare plan, they control what procedures and doctors they use by the policy they choose. Individualisms rules in a democratic Republic; opportunity for anyone
.(2)
 If government
Progressivism:
 (1) An ideology characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members. (2) A political and economic philosophy in which the concept of class struggle plays a central role in understanding society's allegedly inevitable development from oppression under capitalism to a classless society. **
 
Acharnedokument@Acharnedokument Page 3
owns a house, the government elites who write regulations, control that asset and what you can and cannot do. If government owns your business, government elites who write regulations control that asset and what you can and cannot do in operations and profits. If government owns your healthcare it is the government elites who write regulation to what doctors you can use, what procedures are offered, what pharmaceutical drugs you can take.
 A dollar is a promissory note indicating a system of work. If the U.S. dollar‘s worth
represented the value of entitlement payments, the whole monetary system would crash for the dollar would represent no value of work. The more you work (contributing to society) the more assets (dollar, liquid) you have if you save. The opposite is true; the less you participate in societal contributions, by the lack of motivation, ambition, wasteful spending, or dependent on government assistance, the lower the economic
class ―assets‖ (no liquidity). The stimulus to achieve upper class status is why capitalist
economies are so successful; that if you work hard, earn a higher education, sober, (non-addict), increases your contributions to societal constructs thus improves the quality of living for everyone. Even Lincoln knew the power of free enterprise 100 years ago;
“That some should be rich shows that others may become rich and hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise” 
 Abraham Lincon.
Example 1:
 
Two men, ―John‖ and ―Jack‖, come from equal income families. After High
school, both land a job in a mill for $17 hr. John wants an upper class lifestyle for his future family and lives a frugal life saving as much as he can for college courses at night. Jack lives for the moment. His spending habits include drug use, entertainment and wasteful purchases. Living with less, compared to Jack, John saves as much as he can when he can. Working over 40 hours a week, John attends school at night. Jack would never want to lose his evenings if there were a good party to attend. John completes his education, earns 4 times as much as Jack, and lives in an upper middle class neighborhood. Jack, who blew every penny he ever earned, spent his free time relaxing, lives in a housing project, on assisted living, and will not hold a steady job as long as his government benefits do not run out. Under socialism ("income equality" ideology), John's success is seen as greed and insensitive to poverty since John has more than Jack. John has a boat, Jack does not. John has a nice house, Jack lives in a rundown apartment. John can afford cruises to the Bahamas, Jack only lives by the
bottle. Like a cancer in socialist economies, all of the ―Johns‖ of society who lose
economic merits also lose the ambition for a better life, to better themselves in education, and to dream and hope of a successful future. In the end, income equality
turns all the ―Johns‖ in society to ―Jacks‖ to where the society spirals down to a poverty
standard of living and slave to their empowered government who hordes the tax
revenue of the ―Jacks‘… because all the rich ―Johns‖ are bankrupt and so too is the
innovation in products and manufacturing that they strived to achieve. The reward system escalates exponentially spurring innovation, risk taking entrepreneurship, and ambition. The opposite is true for socialist economies and is why  American is hated by her wealth and successes compared to socialist economies. The mechanics of socialism always fall into corruption because you have to take from the ambitious population and give to the unproductive thus increasing society degradation.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->