Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Joint Appellant Brief - Hollister v Soetoro

Joint Appellant Brief - Hollister v Soetoro

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,070|Likes:
Published by xx444

More info:

Published by: xx444 on Nov 21, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

11/17/2013

pdf

text

original

 
o 09-5080
Consolidating No. 09-5161
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER, et al. Case Below 08-2254 JR Appellants,v.Barry Soetoro, in his capacity as a natural person; de facto President in posse; and asde jure President in posse , also known asBarack Obama, et al.Appellees.
APPELLATS JOIT BRIEF
John D. HemenwayD.C. Bar No. 379663Attorney for Appellants4816 Rodman Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20016(202) 244-4819 johndhemenway@comcast.net 
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1216986 Filed: 11/20/2009 Page: 1
 
I
TABLE OF CONTENTSI. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT 1A. The Basis for the District Court’s Subject Matter Jurisdiction 1B. The Basis for Court of Appeals Jurisdiction 1C. Filing Dates 2D. Assertion 2II. Issues Presented for Review 2III. Statement of the Case 5IV. Statement of Facts 13V. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 14VI. ARGUMENT 15A. STANDARD OF REVIEW 15B.
DE FACTO
AND
DE JURE 
THE TIMELINESS OF THEPRESENT COMPLAINT: THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL ELECTIONPREVENTS RECOGNITION OF THE AUTHORITY TO COMMAND 17C.
 
THE CLEAR LANGUAGE OF THE WORD “OBLIGATION” INTHE STATUTE, WHICH IS IN THE DISJUNCTIVE 19D. THE RECOGNIZED AND WELL DEVELOPED LAW OF THE“INTANGIBLE RIGHT OF HONEST SERVICES” TO WHICH CITIZENSARE ENTITLED FROM ELECTED OFFICEHOLDERS AS PART OF THELATTER’S FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES 25E.
 
ERROR OF THE LOWER COURT CONCERNING THE LACK OFREALITY IN THE POSSIBILITY THAT PLAINTIFF HOLLISTER, AS AMEMBER OF THE INDIVIDUAL READY RESERVE, MIGHT BE RECALLEDTO SERVE; IT IS NOT “SPECULATIVE” 28
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1216986 Filed: 11/20/2009 Page: 1
 
I
F.
 
OF BIAS AND THE ISSUES PRESENTED CONCERNING IT 30G.
 
OF BIAS AND RULE 11 34H.
 
THE FAILURE TO EVEN CONSIDER THE AMENDED COMPLAINT 36I UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES A HEARING SHOULDHAVE BEEN HELD 38 j.
 
THE REFUSAL TO ACCEPT THE DEPOSIT INTO ESCROW 39K OF BLOGGING AND TWITTERING 39L.
 
FURTHER OF LACK OF IMMEDIACY AND “SPECULATION” 40VI. CONCLUSION: RELIEF SOUGHT 40CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 32(a) 41CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 41
Case: 09-5080 Document: 1216986 Filed: 11/20/2009 Page: 2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->