that the concept of marriage was a declaration of mutual love and desire between people, not a social or religious contract. In
For Us, The Living
, the governmenthas embraced the concept of private sphere so thoroughly that there is nogovernmental contract decreeing that a couple is married. There are privatefinancial agreements and the like for people who want to enter into them, but most people don’t bother. And yes, all of this is told under the disguise of the future.One of the most popular sets of Heinlein novels revolve around a future historytimeline, with such differences as the space program’s being a private enterpriseand, in some versions, a religious dictatorship taking hold of the United States for atime as a display against fanatical, evangelical, intolerant religions. Now, you might be thinking “Ok, so does that mean she’s a polygamistwho’s given up organized religion?” This is not the case. I haven’t beencompletely won over to Heinlein’s point of view. For all his good ideas, he had afew ideas that are just too way out there. But for the most part, he has influencedme greatly. Heinlein placed great importance on governmental non-interference,and he demonstrated and defended this idea well. He showed the ineffectivenessof trying to legislate private lives and argued that trying to do so was immoral initself, creating a nice counterpoint to the people who attempt to outlaw “immoral”acts. He was also very much against most forms of organized religion. He was of the opinion that religion was the opiate of the masses and seemed to be a nervous
3
Leave a Comment