High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
Nationwide Class Action Allegation
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
- 1
Lybeck
Murphy
LLP
7525 SE 24
th
Street, Ste. 500Mercer Island, WA 98040-2334206-230-4255 Fax 206-230-7791
Lory R. Lybeck
Lybeck Murphy, LLP7525 SE 24
th
Street, Ste. 500Mercer Island, WA 98040-2334206-230-4255 /phone206-230-7791 /faxLybeck
–
Lybeck
–
OSB #83276
Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF OREGON AT PORTLANDTANYA ANDERSEN, Individually and asRepresentative of Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff v.ATLANTIC RECORDINGCORPORATION, a Delaware corporation;PRIORITY RECORDS, LLC, a Californialimited liability company; CAPITOLRECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation;UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delawarecorporation; and BMG MUSIC, a NewYork general partnership; RECORDINGINDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OFAMERICA; SAFENET, INC., f/k/aMEDIA SENTRY, INC., a Delawarecorporation; SETTLEMENT SUPPORTCENTER, LLC, a Washington limitedliability companyDefendants.)))))))))))))))))))))))))))No. CV 07-934 BR
NATIONWIDE CLASS ACTIONALLEGATION
PLAINTIFF’S
SECONDAMENDED COMPLAINTDEMANDFOR JURY TRIALRELATED CASE NOTICE
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
Nationwide Class Action Allegation
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
- 2
Lybeck
Murphy
LLP
7525 SE 24
th
Street, Ste. 500Mercer Island, WA 98040-2334206-230-4255 Fax 206-230-7791
TABLE OF CONTENTSI.
INTRODUCTION
.........................................................................................................5A. Sham on the Courts
……………………………………………………………...
51. Pre-Lawsuit Abuse
……………………………………………………...
52. Sham Lawsuits Against Innocent Individuals
…………………………
.6
II.
RELATED ACTION
…………………………………………………………………
8A.
LR 42 Related Case Notice ……………………………………………………
.81.
Identity of Related Case ………………………………………………..
82.
Nature of Related Case …………………………………………………9
III.
NATURE OF THE CASE
…………………………………………………………….9
IV.
PARTIES
……………………………………………………………………………..10
A. Tanya Andersen
………………………………………………………………
..10B. Defendants
……………………………………………………………………..
101. Defendant Record Companies
…………………………………………
102. Defendant RIAA
………………………………………………………
.103. Defendant MediaSentry
………………………………………………
..114. Defendant Settlement Support Center
…………………………………
11
V.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
……………………………………………………
..11
VI.
CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
…………………………………………………12
VII.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
………………………………………………………..14
A. The National Threat and Sham Litigation Enterprise
…………………………
.14B. Criminal Investigations
………………………………………………………...
16C. Flawed Investigation
…………………………………………………………
..17D.
Secret Lawsuits ………………………………………………………………...
18E. Intimidation and Coercion/Extortion
…………………………………………
..19F. Intimidation and Coercion/Extortion
Sham Lawsuits…………………………
.21
VII.
THE CAMPAIGN OF INTIMIDATION AGAINST TANYA ANDERSEN
……
.22A. Enterprise Engaged in
Mail Fraud …………………………………………….
.22B. Enterprise Engaged in
Wire Fraud …………………………………………….
22C. Enterprise Identified
“
Gotenkito
” ……………………………………………..23
D.
Enterprise Defamed Ms. Andersen ……………………………………………
.24E. Enterprise Knew About Ms.
Andersen’s Health Problems ……………………2
5F. Enterprise Stepped Up Harassment
……………………………………………
.26G. Enterprise Was Caught - Cuts and Runs
………………………………………
28H.
Enterprise of “
Litigation
” is Total Sham ……………………………………...
.29
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526
Nationwide Class Action Allegation
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
- 3
Lybeck
Murphy
LLP
7525 SE 24
th
Street, Ste. 500Mercer Island, WA 98040-2334206-230-4255 Fax 206-230-7791
IX.
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
…………………………………………………………….29
F
IRST
C
LAIM FOR
R
ELIEF
:
N
EGLIGENCE
/
N
EGLIGENCE
P
ER
S
E
(Oregon Law) -
All Defendants
……………………………………………………….
.29A. Negligence
Per Se
……………………………………………………………..30
B. RIAA Negligence / Negligence
Per Se
………………………………………
..30C. MediaSentry Negligence / Negligence
Per Se
…..……………………………..32
D. Record Companies Negligence / Negligence
Per Se
…………………………
..34E. Settlement Support Center Negligence
………………………………………...
35
S
ECOND
C
LAIM FOR
R
ELIEF
:
I
NTENTIONAL
I
NFLICTION OF
E
MOTIONAL
D
ISTRESS
(Oregon law) -
Defendants RIAA, the Record Companies and Settlement Support Center
…………...
...........................................................................................................36
A. Joint Conduct of the RIAA and the
Record Companies …………………….
..36B. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress by Settlement Support Center
…..41
T
HIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
:
F
EDERAL
R
ACKETEERING
I
NFLUENCED
C
LAIMS AND
C
ORRUPT
O
RGANIZATION
A
CT
(18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)) -
All Defendants
………………
.43A.
Enterprise ………………………………………………………………………
43B. Predicate Acts
…………………………………………………………………
.46C. Pattern of Related Racketeering
Acts …………………………………………
.48D.
Injury …………………………………………………………………………...
50
F
OURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
:
F
EDERAL
R
ACKETEERING
I
NFLUENCED
C
LAIMS AND
C
ORRUPT
O
RGANIZATION
A
CT
C
ONSPIRACY TO
E
NGAGE IN
R
ACKETEERING
A
CTIVITY
(18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)) -
All Defendants
………………………………………………
..50
A.
Enterprise ………………………………………………………………………51
B. Predicate A
cts ………………………………………………………………….53
C.
Pattern of Related Racketeering Acts ………………………………………….56
D.
Injury …………………………………………………………………………...57
F
IFTH
C
LAIM FOR
R
ELIEF
:
O
REGON
R
ACKETEER
I
NFLUENCED AND
C
ORRUPT
O
RGANIZATIONS
A
CT
R
ACKETEERING
A
CTIVITY
(ORS 166.720(3)) -
All Defendants
…
57A. Enterpri
se ………………………………………………………………………58
B. Predicate A
cts ………………………………………………………………….60
C. Pattern of Related Racketeering Acts
………………………………………….63
D.
Injury …………………………………………………………………………...64
S
IXTH
C
LAIM FOR
R
ELIEF
:
O
REGON
R
ACKETEER
I
NFLUENCED AND
C
ORRUPT
O
RGANIZATIONS
A
CT
C
ONSPIRACY TO
E
NGAGE IN
R
ACKETEERING
A
CTIVITY
(ORS 166.720(4)) -
All Defendants
……………………………………………………
65A. Enterpri
se ………………………………………………………………………65
B.
Predicate Acts ………………………………………………………………….68
C. Pattern of Related Racke
teering Acts ………………………………………….70
D.
Injury …………………………………………………………………………...72
Sections
« prev | next »- I. INTRODUCTION
- A. Sham on the Courts
- 1. Pre-Lawsuit Abuse
- 2. Sham Lawsuits Against Innocent Individuals
- II. RELATED ACTION
- A. LR 42 Related Case Notice
- 1. Identity of Related Case
- 2. Nature of Related Case
- III. NATURE OF THE CASE
- IV. PARTIES
- A. Tanya Andersen
- B. Defendants
- 1. Defendant Record Companies
- 2. Defendant RIAA
- 3. Defendant MediaSentry
- 4. Defendant Settlement Support Center
- V. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
- VI. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
- VII. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- A. The National Threat and Sham Litigation Enterprise
- B. Criminal Investigations
- C. Flawed Investigation
- D. Secret Lawsuits
- E. Intimidation and Coercion/Extortion
- VIII. The Campaign of Intimidation Against Tanya Andersen
- A. Enterprise Engaged in Mail Fraud
- B. Enterprise Engaged in Wire Fraud
- C. Enterprise Identified ―Gotenkito‖
- D. Enterprise Defamed Ms. Andersen
- E. Enterprise Knew About Ms. Andersen’s Health Problems
- F. Enterprise Stepped Up Harassment
- G. Enterprise Was Caught -- Cuts and Runs
- H. Enterprise of ―Litigation‖ Is Total Sham
- IX. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
- A. Negligence Per Se
- B. RIAA Negligence / Negligence Per Se
- C. MediaSentry Negligence / Negligence Per Se
- D. Record Companies Negligence / Negligence Per Se
- E. Settlement Support Center Negligence
- A. Joint Conduct of the RIAA and the Record Companies
- B. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress by Settlement Support Center
- A. Enterprise
- B. Predicate Acts
- C. Pattern of Related Racketeering Acts
- D. Injury
- B. Pattern of Related Racketeering Acts
- A. RIAA and Record Companies
- B. Settlement Support Center
- Defendants RIAA, Record Companies and Settlement Support Center
- A. RIAA and the Record Companies
- All Defendants
- X. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Add a Comment