High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:09-cv-07943-JFW-CW
Richard I. Fine et al v. U.S. District Court for the CentralDistrict of California et alAssigned to: Judge John F. Walter Referred to: Magistrate Judge Carla WoehrleRelated Case:2:08-cv-02906-JFW-CWCause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)Date Filed: 10/30/2009Date Terminated: 11/05/2009Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus(General)Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
PetitionerRichard I. Fine
represented by
Richard I. Fine
# 1824367Men's Central Jail441 Bauchet StreetLos Angeles, CA 90012PRO SEV.
RespondentU.S. District Court for the CentralDistrict of California
represented by
Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
AUSA - Office of US AttorneyCivil Division300 North Los Angeles Street Suite 7516Los Angeles , CA 90012213-894-2879Email: USACAC.Civil@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
RespondentSheriff of Los Angeles County
RespondentDavid P. Yaffe
Los Angeles County Superior Court
RespondentSuperior Court of the State of California
County of Los Angeles
Date Filed#Docket Text
10/30/20091 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241)
Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge CarlaWoehrle.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE PAID.), filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine.(ghap)(Entered: 11/02/2009)10/30/20092 NOTICE OF REFERENCE TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Pursuant to the
provisions of the Local Rules, the within action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further matters as appropriate. The Court must benotified within 15 days of any change of address. (ghap) (Entered: 11/02/2009)11/05/2009 Proposed Order Dismissing Petition signed by the District Judge. (pcl) (Entered:11/06/2009)11/05/20093 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Judge
John F. Walter: It is ORDERED that judgment be entered summarily dismissing the petition as successive. (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 11/06/2009)11/05/20094 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is
dismissed as successive. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pcl) (Entered: 11/06/2009)11/06/20095 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY by Courtroom Deputy Clerk for Judge John F. Walter,
ORDERING Petitioner to Recuse Magistrate Judge Carla M. Woehrle, Ex ParteApplication for Immediate Release and for Immediate Grant of Writ of HabeasCorpus, and Notice of Non-Consent to Magistrate Judge submitted by Petitioner Richard I. Fine received on 11/6/2009 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Case Terminated. (jp) (Entered: 11/10/2009)11/09/20096 NOTICE Of Non-Consent To Magistrate Judge As Consenting In A Previous Writ
Petition Resulted In A Denial Of Due Process And The Filing Of This Petiiton filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine. (pcl) (Entered: 11/10/2009)11/09/20097 (STRICKEN per Order filed 11/10/200910) EX PARTE APPLICATION For
Immediate Release And For Immediate Grant Of Writ Of Habeas Corpus filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine.(pcl) Modified on 11/16/2009 (pcl). Modified on11/16/2009 (pcl). (Entered: 11/10/2009)11/09/20098 MOTION to Recuse Judge John F. Walter filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine. (jp)
(Entered: 11/13/2009)11/10/200910 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle: The documents listed below were
improperly filed for the following reasons: Judgment has been entered denying the petition and closing this case. The application is duplicative and moot; therefore, thefollowing document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: EX PARTE APPLICATION For Immediate Release7. (pcl) (Entered:11/16/2009)11/10/200911 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle:
ORDERING Notice of non-consent submitted by Petitioner Richard I. Fine receivedon 11/6/2009 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Case termed -Document moot. (pcl) (Entered: 11/16/2009)
Add a Comment
joey-bananaleft a comment