• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURTIN AND FOR BLACK HAWK COUNTY _______________________________________________________________________  _ COMES NOW PETITIONER, COLLEEN A. COLLINS, PRO SE, AND FOR HER RESISTANCE TO THE RESPONDENT’S APPLICATION FOR DEFERRED FILINGFEE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE STATES AS FOLLOWS :1. RESPONDENT HAS NOT BEEN FORTHCOMING IN HIS APPLICATIONREGARDING INCOME STATED IN THE AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFERRED FILING ASFOLLOWS:
3. “The only income I receive is a DHS food-stamp benefit of $113.00monthly.” 
2. RESPONDENT
FAILED TO REPORT INCOME FROM UNEMPLOYMENTBENEFITS
, POSSIBLE
GAMBLING WINNINGS
, AND INCOME ACCESSIBLETO HIM FROM HIS PRESENT WIFE COLLECTING THREE CHILD SUPPORTPAYMENTS MONTHLY.EQUITY#: CDDM046901MOTION TO STRIKEAPPLICATION FOR DEFERREDFILING FEE AND RESPONSE TOORDER TO SHOW CAUSEColleen A. Collins (Tasseff)Petitioner, pro sevs.Thomas G. Tasseff Respondent, pro se
 
3. RESPONDENT HAS BEEN SEEN GAMBLING AT MESKWAKI CASINO SINCEHIS REQUEST FOR DEFERRED FILING FEES. IF THE COURT WOULD SOCHOOSE TO SUBPOENA MESKWAKI CASINO, THE RESULTS WOULD VERIFYPETITIONER’S STATEMENT IS TRUTH, ALTHOUGH PETITIONER WASINFORMED BY HER FORMER ATTORNEY THAT ONE “CANNOT SUBPOENA ATRIBE”. IN RETROSPECT COUNSEL’S OBJECTIVES WERE TO CONTRIBUTEAS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE TOWARD HIS CLIENT’S INTERESTS AND NOTCREATE ANY MORE WORK DUE TO “PRO BONO” STATUS AND MAY HAVEGIVEN PETITIONER INACCURATE INFORMATION.
4.
IOWA CODE RULE 1.1017 SUPPORTS PETITIONER’S CLAIMS AS FOLLOWS:
 FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT; MOTION. THE COURT MAY, ON MOTION, INQUIRE INTO THE ASSIGNMENT OF A JUDGMENT, OR ITS ENTRY TO THEUSE OF ANY PARTY, AND CANCEL THE ASSIGNMENT OR STRIKE OUT SUCH USE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WHENEVER IT DETERMINES THE SAME TO BE INEQUITABLE, FRAUDULENT OR DONE IN BAD FAITH. [REPORT 1943; NOVEMBER 9, 2001, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 15, 2002] 
AND
 IOWA CODE RULE 702.9 DECEPTION.
“DECEPTION” CONSISTS OF KNOWINGLY DOING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:1. CREATING OR CONFIRMING ANOTHER’S BELIEF OR IMPRESSION AS TOTHE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF A FACT OR CONDITION WHICH IS FALSE AND WHICH THE ACTOR DOES NOT BELIEVE TO BE TRUE.2. FAILING TO CORRECT A FALSE BELIEF OR IMPRESSION AS TO THE  EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF A FACT OR CONDITION WHICH THE  ACTOR PREVIOUSLY HAS CREATED OR CONFIRMED.
3. PREVENTING ANOTHER FROM ACQUIRING INFORMATION  PERTINENT TO THE DISPOSITION OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN 
 ANY COMMERCIAL OR NONCOMMERCIAL TRANSACTION OR TRANSFER.4. SELLING OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRING OR ENCUMBERING PROPERTY  AND FAILING TO DISCLOSE A LIEN, ADVERSE CLAIM, OR OTHER LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO THE ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY, WHETHER SUCH 
 
 IMPEDIMENT IS OR IS NOT VALID, OR IS OR IS NOT A MATTER OF OFFICIAL RECORD.5. PROMISING PAYMENT, THE DELIVERY OF GOODS, OR OTHER PERFORMANCE WHICH THE ACTOR DOES NOT INTEND TO PERFORM OR KNOWS THE ACTOR WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PERFORM. FAILURE TO PERFORM, STANDING ALONE, IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT THE ACTOR DID NOT INTEND TO PERFORM.
5. PETITIONER HAS APPEALED FROM THE BLACK HAWK DISTRICT COURT’SRULING; FILED BY THE IOWA SUPREME COURT UNDER DOCKET #09-0265.6. PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY, ROBERT THOMPSON WAS GRANTED AWITHDRAWAL ON THE GROUNDS THAT “THE CASE HAS BEEN CONCLUDEDAND REPRESENTATION IS NO LONGER NEEDED”, ALTHOUGH HIS“MISREPRESENTATION” HAS CAUSED AN ESCALATION OF LEGAL TRAUMACAUSING IREPARABLE HARM AND PRESENTLY PETITIONER FACESCONTEMPT CHARGES.7. PETITIONER’S FIRST CONVERSATION WITH HER COURT APPOINTEDATTORNEY GRANTED BY THE COURT TO REPRESENT HER IN THE HEARINGTO “SHOW CAUSE” SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 24, 2008 HAS AFFIRMED THATHER DEFENSE ONCE AGAIN, WOULD NOT BE HEARD.8. APPOINTED COUNSEL, DEL WERNER’S REPLY TO PETITIONER’SEXPLANATION OF NOT BEING ABLE TO SPEAK IN COURT IN HER DEFENSE,STATES AS FOLLOWS:
“YOU AREN’T SUPPOSED TO SPEAK IN COURT.” 
MR. WERNER’S REPLY TO PETITIONER FILING A GRIEVANCE AGAINST HER ATTORNEY FOR MISREPRESENTATION STATES AS FOLLOWS:
“YOU CAN’T FILE A GRIEVANCE AGAINST AN ATTORNEY THAT WORKS FOR FREE!” 
THUS, IN ORDER TO ASSURE THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO DEFENDHERSELF, PETITIONER MUST PROCEED PRO SE.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...