Summarized policy positions and "asks" of legislators for grassroots advocacy fly-in trip.
This document was made available to Congressional staff prior to advocate visits.
Summarized policy positions and "asks" of legislators for grassroots advocacy fly-in trip.
This document was made available to Congressional staff prior to advocate visits.
Summarized policy positions and "asks" of legislators for grassroots advocacy fly-in trip.
This document was made available to Congressional staff prior to advocate visits.
2014 Priority Issues Food Labels Consumers are paying closer attention to their food. They deserve consistent, clear labeling based on sound science. Labels should be based on fact, not fear. Of the eight approved bioengineered (GMO) products, all have been proven safe by hundreds of independent studies. The Federal Government should be the sole policy-setting body regarding food labels because the FDA and USDA have the resources and expertise to evaluate bioengineered foods and define terms. A patchwork of 50 different state laws regarding labels is confusing for consumers, manufacturers and farmers. Currently, all mandatory labels are warnings. GMO labeling should only be mandatory when a bioengineered food is scientifically proven to be unsafe or materially different than its traditional counterpart. Without definition by the Federal Government, common terms like natural and non GMO mislead consumers and result in confusion. Please support H.R. 4432, the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act. Waters of the United States The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have proposed a new rule that would expand the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction beyond Congressional intent. The recent Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) Federal Court decision established that Floridas Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the five Water Management Districts are using sound science to manage water quality. The EPAs proposed rule would usurp the authority of Florida DEP and the Water Management Districts and limit their authority to improve water quality. An April Congressional Research Service (CRS) report strongly indicates this proposed rule WILL broaden the reach of the EPAs authority under the CWA. The regulation of farm ditches or canals, could require burdensome new discharge permitting to carry out critical farm activities, such as applying fertilizer and crop protection tools. The Interpretive Rule issued in conjunction with this rulemaking significantly narrows what has been considered as a normal farming practice, requiring Florida farmers to meet stringent Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) technical standards in order to qualify for long-held exemptions from permits. Please support language in appropriations limiting funding to finalize this rule.
FLORIDA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
THE VOICE OF AGRICULTURE
Labor Issues in Agriculture EPA - Worker Protection Standard (WPS) The proposed WPS rule allows a third party representative with no legal standing to intervene in an employer/employee relationship. The WPS proposed rule creates a new definition of authorized employee representative which requires employers to provide these representatives with all information the employee is entitled to receive under the rule. This is an unnecessary intrusion into the employer/employee relationship. The proposed rule allows employees to orally designate their representative, which may have legal liability consequences if confidential employee information is unintentionally disclosed to an unauthorized representative. An authorized employee representative, as defined in the proposed rule, is fundamentally different than legally-codified relationships such as attorney/client, power of attorney or collective bargaining entities. Please support elimination of the authorized employee representative provision from the proposed rule. Guest Worker Reform The US foreign worker visa system needs to be reformed to ensure that Florida agriculture has a legal, stable supply of workers. Floridas agricultural industry relies heavily on manual labor and employers are facing a shortage of workers who are willing and able to work in the fields. The current H-2A program is untenable and potentially beyond reform. Cumbersome bureaucracy, increased scrutiny, flawed wage calculations and a failure to include dairies and nurseries all prevent widespread participation. We support an effective, flexible guest worker program which: o recognizes agriculture under a separate program; o encompasses all specialties of agriculture, including dairies and nurseries; o provides flexibility for the worker and employer; o streamlines processes; o reduces mandatory worker home-country return periods to maintain work flow; and o contains an adequate transition provision to adjust to legal status after meeting certain stipulations (e.g., fines, criminal and work history check, etc.). Please support reform that provides an agricultural guest worker program which encourages full participation of all employers and current workers. Questions? Contact Florida Farm Bureau National Affairs Coordinator Janell Hendren at 352-359-5268 or Janell.Hendren@ffbf.org